Romero-Serrano Estefanía, Delgado Navarro Carlos, Quesada Ocete Blanca, De Andrés Jose
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hospital de Manises, Valencia, Spain.
Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Management, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Pain Rep. 2025 Jun 6;10(4):e1302. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001302. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are well-established therapies for chronic pain management and mortality prevention in cardiovascular pathologies, respectively. As both devices rely on electrical current, there are concerns regarding potential interference between them that could lead to severe consequences.
In this case report, we describe the case of a 50-year-old woman who had been implanted with an ICD for 5 years due to ischemic cardiopathy and class III heart failure symptoms, and who was referred to the Pain Unit after 4 years of persistent pain on the soles of her feet, which had not responded to opioids nor to percutaneous procedures. Thus, after being deemed suitable by anesthesiologists and obtaining psychological approval, she underwent implantation of an SCS closed-loop system.
Three months after the procedure, she reported an 80% relief of her pain. Both devices effectively functioned at all times, and no interference was observed.
Pain management using a closed-loop SCS in a patient with an ICD can be safely performed without interference between the devices.
脊髓刺激(SCS)装置和植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)分别是用于慢性疼痛管理和预防心血管疾病死亡率的成熟疗法。由于这两种装置都依赖电流,人们担心它们之间可能存在潜在干扰,从而导致严重后果。
在本病例报告中,我们描述了一名50岁女性的病例,她因缺血性心脏病和III级心力衰竭症状植入ICD已5年,在足底持续疼痛4年且对阿片类药物和经皮手术均无反应后,被转诊至疼痛科。因此,在麻醉医生认为合适并获得心理批准后,她接受了SCS闭环系统的植入。
术后三个月,她报告疼痛减轻了80%。两种装置始终有效运行,未观察到干扰。
在植入ICD的患者中使用闭环SCS进行疼痛管理可以安全进行,且装置之间不会产生干扰。