• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入心脏装置患者的高频脊髓刺激

High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient with an Implanted Cardiac Device.

作者信息

Kissoon Narayan R, Hoelzer Bryan C, Martin David P, Lamer Tim J

机构信息

Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2017 Apr;17(4):558-563. doi: 10.1111/papr.12530. Epub 2016 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1111/papr.12530
PMID:27770599
Abstract

BACKGROUND

New advances in spinal cord stimulation have led to improved treatment of patients suffering from chronic pain. While the overall safety of newer stimulation devices has been established, no published reports exist regarding safety considerations when these devices are implanted in patients with a preexisting cardiac device.

CASE REPORT

An 83-year-old man with a history of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest secondary to an episode of ventricular fibrillation underwent automated implantable cardiac defibrillator placement. Concomitantly, he suffered from intractable chronic low axial back pain and was deemed a candidate for high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Cardiac monitoring during SCS trial and implantation was performed with no interference noted. Following high-frequency SCS implantation, the patient was observed to have significant pain relief with functional improvement.

DISCUSSION

While others have reported safety during traditional SCS in patients with implanted cardiac devices, this is the first case report to describe safe and effective use of high-frequency SCS in a patient with an implanted cardiac device.

摘要

背景

脊髓刺激技术的新进展已使慢性疼痛患者的治疗得到改善。虽然新型刺激设备的总体安全性已得到确立,但尚无关于将这些设备植入已有心脏设备的患者时的安全考量的公开报告。

病例报告

一名83岁男性,有因室颤发作导致院外心脏骤停的病史,接受了自动植入式心脏除颤器植入术。同时,他患有顽固性慢性下腰部轴向疼痛,被认为是高频(10kHz)脊髓刺激(SCS)的候选者。在SCS试验和植入过程中进行了心脏监测,未发现干扰。高频SCS植入后,观察到患者疼痛明显缓解,功能得到改善。

讨论

虽然其他人报告了植入心脏设备的患者在传统SCS期间的安全性,但这是第一例描述在植入心脏设备的患者中安全有效地使用高频SCS的病例报告。

相似文献

1
High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient with an Implanted Cardiac Device.植入心脏装置患者的高频脊髓刺激
Pain Pract. 2017 Apr;17(4):558-563. doi: 10.1111/papr.12530. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
2
Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT.脊髓刺激治疗慢性难治性腰背和下肢疼痛患者的长期生活质量改善:来自 SENZA-RCT 的 12 个月结果。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2035-2044. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1890-8. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
3
Spinal Cord Stimulation: Comparing Traditional Low-frequency Tonic Waveforms to Novel High Frequency and Burst Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain.脊髓刺激:比较传统的低频持续波形式与新型的高频和爆发刺激治疗慢性腰痛。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Mar 14;23(4):25. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0763-3.
4
Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial.10千赫高频与传统低频脊髓刺激治疗慢性腰腿痛的比较:一项多中心、随机、对照关键试验的24个月结果
Neurosurgery. 2016 Nov;79(5):667-677. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001418.
5
High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: 6-Month Australian Clinical Experience.10千赫兹高频脊髓刺激治疗慢性疼痛:澳大利亚6个月临床经验
Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):267-80.
6
Redefining Spinal Cord Stimulation "Trials": A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Single-Stage Wireless Permanent Implantable Devices.重新定义脊髓刺激“试验”:使用单阶段无线永久植入式装置的随机对照试验。
Neuromodulation. 2020 Jan;23(1):96-101. doi: 10.1111/ner.12970. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
7
Long-Term Improvements in Chronic Axial Low Back Pain Patients Without Previous Spinal Surgery: A Cohort Analysis of 10-kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation over 36 Months.慢性轴向腰痛患者在未经先前脊柱手术的情况下的长期改善:10kHz 高频脊髓刺激 36 个月的队列分析。
Pain Med. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):1219-1226. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx237.
8
10-kHz High-Frequency SCS Therapy: A Clinical Summary.10千赫兹高频脊髓刺激疗法:临床总结
Pain Med. 2015 May;16(5):934-42. doi: 10.1111/pme.12617. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
9
High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Case Series of Patients With or Without Previous Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation.10kHz高频脊髓刺激治疗复杂性区域疼痛综合征:有或无前脊髓刺激器植入患者的病例系列
Pain Pract. 2019 Mar;19(3):289-294. doi: 10.1111/papr.12739. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
10
Lack of electrical interference between spinal cord stimulators and other implanted electrical pulse devices.脊髓刺激器与其他植入式电脉冲装置之间不存在电干扰。
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:475-478. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A closed-loop spinal cord stimulation system in a patient with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.一名植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的闭环脊髓刺激系统。
Pain Rep. 2025 Jun 6;10(4):e1302. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001302. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Potential interference of spinal cord and sacral stimulators with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review.脊髓和骶神经刺激器对心脏植入式电子设备的潜在干扰:一项系统评价
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 May 21;48(1):428. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03578-y.
3
Spinal cord stimulation in a patient with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for managing chronic chest pain: a case report and literature review.
植入式心脏复律除颤器患者脊髓刺激治疗慢性胸痛:病例报告及文献综述
Pain Manag. 2024 Oct-Nov;14(10-11):535-540. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2426971. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
4
Research hotspots and trends on spinal cord stimulation for pain treatment: a two-decade bibliometric analysis.脊髓刺激治疗疼痛的研究热点与趋势:一项二十年的文献计量分析
Front Neurosci. 2023 May 25;17:1158712. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1158712. eCollection 2023.