Jin Wenting, Wang Meixia, Wang Yang, Zhu Beidi, Wang Qingqing, Zhou Chunmei, Li Pei, Hu Chaohui, Liu Jun, Pan Jue, Chen Jiachang, Hu Bijie
Department of Infectious Diseases, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Infection Management, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0312724. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03127-24. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
Tuberculosis (TB) returns to be the leading infectious killer globally after coronavirus disease 2019. The World Health Organization (WHO) formally included targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) in its list of recommendations for (MTB) and drug resistance (DR). In this study, we explored the application of various clinical sample types for TB diagnosis and DR profiles. In comparison to the composite reference standard, the overall sensitivity values of culture, Xpert, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), and tNGS were 0.458, 0.614, 0.772, and 0.760, respectively. tNGS had sensitivity similar to mNGS, which had advantages over culture and Xpert, respectively, despite different classification of sample types. In comparison to the microbiological reference standard, the overall sensitivity values of culture, Xpert, mNGS, and tNGS were 0.606, 0.811, 0.856, and 0.884, respectively. Suprisingly, in extrapulmonary tissue and serous effusion, mNGS and tNGS had advantages over Xpert. DR-related mutations were detected in 15 cases (13.2%). There were 51 (44.7%) applicable for all DR genes, with 22 (19.3%) not applicable for DR genes. DR genes were partially applicable in 41 (36.0%) samples. However, in culture-negative TB cases, tNGS can additionally provide 52.7% first-line DR profiles. Sanger sequencing was performed on 14 samples to confirm gene mutation identified by tNGS, and the results were entirely consistent. It was concluded that the tNGS assay was a promising approach in the initial diagnostic test of MTB and DR-related genes in different clinical samples, even for the smear- and culture-negative paucibacillary samples.IMPORTANCEtNGS combines gene-specific amplification with next-generation sequencing to detect MTB and drug-resistant genes by amplifying numerous loci directly from clinical samples. The WHO implemented tNGS for the purpose of monitoring respiratory specimens for MTB detection and DR-TB due to its high sensitivity and specificity, culture independence, and ability to report heterogeneous/silent mutations. The sensitivity outperformed both culture and Xpert, and the turnaround time was significantly less than that of culture-based assays. The tNGS assay used in this study costs USD 96 and has a 12 hour turnaround time. Nonetheless, tNGS has a great deal of promise for enhancing TB detection while also addressing DR strains.
在2019冠状病毒病之后,结核病再度成为全球主要的感染性杀手。世界卫生组织(WHO)正式将靶向新一代测序(tNGS)纳入其针对结核分枝杆菌(MTB)和耐药性(DR)的推荐列表。在本研究中,我们探索了各种临床样本类型在结核病诊断和耐药谱分析中的应用。与综合参考标准相比,培养法、Xpert、宏基因组新一代测序(mNGS)和tNGS的总体灵敏度值分别为0.458、0.614、0.772和0.760。tNGS的灵敏度与mNGS相似,尽管样本类型分类不同,但分别优于培养法和Xpert。与微生物学参考标准相比,培养法、Xpert、mNGS和tNGS的总体灵敏度值分别为0.606、0.811、0.856和0.884。令人惊讶的是,在肺外组织和胸腔积液中,mNGS和tNGS优于Xpert。在15例(13.2%)中检测到与耐药相关的突变。有51例(44.7%)适用于所有耐药基因,22例(19.3%)不适用于耐药基因。耐药基因在41例(36.0%)样本中部分适用。然而,在培养阴性的结核病病例中,tNGS还可额外提供52.7%的一线耐药谱。对14个样本进行了桑格测序以确认tNGS鉴定的基因突变,结果完全一致。得出的结论是,tNGS检测在不同临床样本中对MTB和耐药相关基因的初始诊断测试中是一种有前景的方法,即使对于涂片和培养阴性的少菌型样本也是如此。重要性tNGS将基因特异性扩增与新一代测序相结合,通过直接从临床样本中扩增多个位点来检测MTB和耐药基因。由于其高灵敏度和特异性、无需培养以及能够报告异质性/沉默突变,WHO实施tNGS用于监测呼吸道标本中的MTB检测和耐多药结核病。其灵敏度优于培养法和Xpert,周转时间明显短于基于培养的检测方法。本研究中使用的tNGS检测成本为96美元,周转时间为12小时。尽管如此,tNGS在增强结核病检测同时应对耐药菌株方面有很大前景。