Suppr超能文献

实施预先护理计划的障碍与促进因素:一项国家和组织层面的定性研究

Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Advance Care Planning: A Qualitative Study at National and Organizational Levels.

作者信息

Brøderud Linn, Førde Reidun, Romøren Maria, Klopstad Wahl Astrid, Pedersen Reidar

机构信息

Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;31(4):e70131. doi: 10.1111/jep.70131.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aging population, enhanced medical opportunities, increased costs and emphasis on patient participation make advance care planning (ACP) important and it provides an evidence-based framework to ensure patient autonomy in future healthcare decisions. Despite the extensive international research literature supporting ACP, implementation seems challenging. Implementing complex interventions like ACP probably requires a system-wide approach. However, there is scarce research on the barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation as perceived at national and organizational levels.

AIM

To explore the barriers and facilitators affecting ACP implementation as perceived at national and organizational levels.

METHODS

Fifteen in-depth individual interviews were conducted with stakeholders at national and organizational levels. A semi-structured interview guide was used, targeting overarching conditions and framework factors that could have an impact. Data was analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Barriers to ACP implementation described by participants included: Lack of prioritization of ACP at all levels; paradigms and culture of healthcare delivery, personal barriers and attitudes, and lack of competence; lack of collaboration and documentation between levels of healthcare; and lack of systems, routines, time and resources within healthcare services. Facilitators included: Cultural change; support in priority setting; national guideline and incentives; management commitment and support; systems, routines and local implementation efforts; ACP capacity building, implementation competence, and ethical reflection; dissemination of the benefits of ACP, including public education; and better collaboration and communication between levels of healthcare.

CONCLUSION

There appear to be significant barriers and facilitators to ACP implementation as perceived at the national and organizational levels of healthcare. Although ACP implementation appears to require a combination of top-down and bottom-up initiatives, national and organizational barriers and facilitators seem important in setting priorities in clinical practice, with an emphasis on financial incentives. An overarching cultural change of healthcare delivery that supports interventions such as ACP appears to be critical for improved implementation.

摘要

背景

人口老龄化、医疗机会增加、成本上升以及对患者参与的重视使得预先护理计划(ACP)变得重要,它提供了一个循证框架,以确保患者在未来医疗决策中的自主权。尽管有大量国际研究文献支持ACP,但实施起来似乎具有挑战性。实施像ACP这样的复杂干预措施可能需要一种全系统的方法。然而,在国家和组织层面上,关于ACP实施的障碍和促进因素的研究却很少。

目的

探讨在国家和组织层面上,影响ACP实施的障碍和促进因素。

方法

对国家和组织层面的利益相关者进行了15次深入的个人访谈。使用了半结构化访谈指南,针对可能产生影响的总体条件和框架因素。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

参与者描述的ACP实施障碍包括:各级对ACP缺乏优先排序;医疗服务的模式和文化、个人障碍和态度以及缺乏能力;医疗服务各层级之间缺乏协作和记录;以及医疗服务机构内部缺乏系统、常规流程、时间和资源。促进因素包括:文化变革;在确定优先事项方面的支持;国家指南和激励措施;管理层的承诺和支持;系统、常规流程和地方实施工作;ACP能力建设、实施能力和伦理反思;传播ACP的益处,包括公众教育;以及医疗服务各层级之间更好的协作和沟通。

结论

在医疗保健的国家和组织层面上,ACP实施似乎存在重大障碍和促进因素。尽管ACP实施似乎需要自上而下和自下而上举措的结合,但国家和组织层面的障碍和促进因素在确定临床实践的优先事项方面似乎很重要,重点是财政激励措施。支持诸如ACP等干预措施的医疗服务总体文化变革似乎对改善实施至关重要。

相似文献

6
Qualitative evaluation of the SHARING Choices trial of primary care advance care planning for adults with and without dementia.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Nov;72(11):3413-3426. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19154. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
9
Implementing advance care planning in Swedish healthcare settings - a qualitative study of professionals' experiences.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023 Mar;41(1):23-32. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2155456. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
10
Implementing Advance Care Planning in Acute Hospitals: Leading the Transformation of Norms.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jun;67(6):1278-1285. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15857. Epub 2019 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

2
Advance care planning: It is time to rethink our goals.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Dec;71(12):3963-3966. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18511. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
Implementation of Advance Care Planning in Norway.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Aug;180:163-167. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.05.017. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
4
Advance Care Planning in the United States: A 2023 review.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Aug;180:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
6
Implementation Challenges for a Multisite Advance Care Planning Pragmatic Trial: Lessons Learned.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Aug;66(2):e265-e273. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.04.022. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
8
End-of-life treatment preferences and advanced care planning among older adults.
Death Stud. 2024 Feb;48(2):95-102. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2023.2189326. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
9
The care planning umbrella: The evolution of advance care planning.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2350-2356. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18287. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
10
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验