VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, MI, 48105, Ann Arbor, USA.
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
Many implementation efforts fail, even with highly developed plans for execution, because contextual factors can be powerful forces working against implementation in the real world. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is one of the most commonly used determinant frameworks to assess these contextual factors; however, it has been over 10 years since publication and there is a need for updates. The purpose of this project was to elicit feedback from experienced CFIR users to inform updates to the framework.
User feedback was obtained from two sources: (1) a literature review with a systematic search; and (2) a survey of authors who used the CFIR in a published study. Data were combined across both sources and reviewed to identify themes; a consensus approach was used to finalize all CFIR updates. The VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System IRB declared this study exempt from the requirements of 38 CFR 16 based on category 2.
The systematic search yielded 376 articles that contained the CFIR in the title and/or abstract and 334 unique authors with contact information; 59 articles included feedback on the CFIR. Forty percent (n = 134/334) of authors completed the survey. The CFIR received positive ratings on most framework sensibility items (e.g., applicability, usability), but respondents also provided recommendations for changes. Overall, updates to the CFIR include revisions to existing domains and constructs as well as the addition, removal, or relocation of constructs. These changes address important critiques of the CFIR, including better centering innovation recipients and adding determinants to equity in implementation.
The updates in the CFIR reflect feedback from a growing community of CFIR users. Although there are many updates, constructs can be mapped back to the original CFIR to ensure longitudinal consistency. We encourage users to continue critiquing the CFIR, facilitating the evolution of the framework as implementation science advances.
即使有高度发达的执行计划,许多实施工作仍会失败,因为在现实世界中,背景因素可能是强大的实施阻力。《实施研究综合框架》(CFIR)是评估这些背景因素的最常用决定因素框架之一;然而,自发布以来已经过去了 10 多年,因此需要更新。本项目旨在征求经验丰富的 CFIR 用户的反馈意见,为框架更新提供信息。
用户反馈来自两个来源:(1)系统搜索的文献回顾;(2)在已发表研究中使用 CFIR 的作者的调查。对两个来源的数据进行了合并和审查,以确定主题;采用共识方法确定了所有 CFIR 更新的最终版本。VA 安纳堡医疗保健系统 IRB 根据第 38 CFR 16 条的第 2 类,宣布该研究豁免 38 CFR 16 的要求。
系统搜索产生了 376 篇包含 CFIR 标题和/或摘要的文章和 334 篇具有联系信息的独特作者;59 篇文章包含 CFIR 的反馈。334 名作者中有 40%(n=134/334)完成了调查。CFIR 在大多数框架敏感性项目上(如适用性、可用性)获得了积极评价,但受访者也提出了更改建议。总体而言,CFIR 的更新包括对现有领域和结构的修订,以及添加、删除或重新定位结构。这些更改解决了 CFIR 的重要批评,包括更好地关注创新接受者和在实施中加入公平性决定因素。
CFIR 的更新反映了不断壮大的 CFIR 用户社区的反馈意见。尽管有许多更新,但可以将结构映射回原始 CFIR,以确保纵向一致性。我们鼓励用户继续批评 CFIR,促进框架的发展,因为实施科学在不断进步。