Zhi Lihuan, Mireyi Jumanali, Maierhaba Abulizi, Xu Hua, He Lijuan, Lizha Jiangabieke
School of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 10;20(6):e0321877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321877. eCollection 2025.
Men with infertility are susceptible to fertility pressure, thus affecting their fertility quality of life. To develop fertility-pressure resilience interventions, we investigated whether mindfulness and social support could buffer the association between perceived fertility pressure and fertility quality of life in Chinese infertile men. In this cross-sectional study, Chinese men with infertility who visited the clinic for semen examination completed the Fertility Pressure Inventory, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, Social Support Scale, and Fertility Quality of Life Scale online. In total, 469 Chinese infertile men (mean age: 32 years) were recruited, of whom 414 (88.3%) reported no childbearing history or high fertility stress. Analysis using generalised linear models revealed that social support had a moderating effect on the association between reproductive stress and reproductive quality of life (F = 11.006, P = 0.001), and between the core (F = 9.063, P = 0.003) and treatment (F = 9.383, P = 0.002) subdimensions of reproductive quality of life and reproductive stress. Among men with high social support scores, the association between reproductive stress and reproductive quality of life (t = -3.146, P = 0.002) and the core subdimension (t = -3.333, P = 0.001) was significant, whereas among men with low social support scores, the association between reproductive stress and reproductive quality of life (t = 0.906, P = 0.365) and the core subdimension (t = 0.266, P = 0.790) was not significant. Mindfulness did not significantly regulate fertility stress and reproductive quality of life(F = 1.528, P = 0.217), its core (F = 1.406, P = 0.236) and treatment (F = 1.026, P = 0.312) subdimensions. Higher social support levels attenuated the negative association between fertility stress and reproductive quality of life (including core dimensions) in infertile men. Experimental studies are needed to determine whether social support is a protective factor.
患有不孕症的男性易受生育压力影响,进而影响其生育生活质量。为了开发增强生育压力恢复力的干预措施,我们调查了正念和社会支持是否能缓冲中国不孕男性感知到的生育压力与生育生活质量之间的关联。在这项横断面研究中,前来诊所进行精液检查的中国不孕男性在线完成了生育压力量表、正念注意觉知量表、社会支持量表和生育生活质量量表。总共招募了469名中国不孕男性(平均年龄:32岁),其中414名(88.3%)报告无生育史或生育压力大。使用广义线性模型进行的分析显示,社会支持对生殖压力与生殖生活质量之间的关联具有调节作用(F = 11.006,P = 0.001),以及对生殖生活质量的核心(F = 9.063,P = 0.003)和治疗(F = 9.383,P = 0.002)子维度与生殖压力之间的关联具有调节作用。在社会支持得分高的男性中,生殖压力与生殖生活质量(t = -3.146,P = 0.002)及核心子维度(t = -3.333,P = 0.001)之间的关联显著,而在社会支持得分低的男性中,生殖压力与生殖生活质量(t = 0.906,P = 0.365)及核心子维度(t = 0.266,P = 0.790)之间的关联不显著。正念对生育压力和生殖生活质量(F = 1.528,P = 0.217)、其核心(F = 1.406,P = 0.236)和治疗(F = 1.026,P = 0.312)子维度没有显著调节作用。较高的社会支持水平减弱了不孕男性生育压力与生殖生活质量(包括核心维度)之间的负相关。需要进行实验研究来确定社会支持是否为一个保护因素。