Lachnit Catherine, Esplandiu Emily, Patterson Joshua, Lirman Diego
Department of Marine Biology and Ecology, Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science, University of Miami, Key Biscayne, Florida, United States of America.
Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida/IFAS, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 10;20(6):e0325468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325468. eCollection 2025.
Amidst the decline of coral reef ecosystems, restoration practitioners are expanding their focus to incorporate key reef community components, such as grazers, to improve site conditions and the long-term survivorship of restored corals. We investigated the use of hatchery-propagated Diadema antillarum as well as two other locally abundant urchin species, Lytechinus variegatus and Echinometra viridis, for coral-urchin tandem reef restoration in Florida, USA. Urchins were deployed onto reef plots at various stages of Acropora cervicornis restoration and provided artificial cement refuges to evaluate retention and herbivory rates. Retention of urchins was low and variable among species. After 42 days, retention was 22% for E. viridis, 7% for D. antillarum, and 0% for L. variegatus. Retention was influenced by plot complexity (restoration state) and was significantly higher in high-complexity plots for D. antillarum and E. viridis. Within plots, refuge types did not have a significant influence on urchin retention. A reduction in macroalgal cover was only observed on plots with relocated E. viridis when densities were maintained > 0.4 urchins m-2. A second deployment of D. antillarum, with urchins caged for a month prior to release, resulted in significantly higher urchin retention. Within cages, grazing and the consumption of coral tissue were influenced by urchin density. At low urchin densities (4 urchins m-2) macroalgae cover remained high and corals were overgrown by algae. At intermediate densities (12 urchins m-2) algae were reduced and the growth of corals was maximized. At the highest densities (40 urchins m-2), algal cover was reduced but urchins caused tissue mortality as a result of over-grazing, highlighting the importance of maintaining relocated urchins at adequate densities to maximize the benefits of tandem restoration. Thus, if retention can be improved and urchins maintained at intermediate densities, the tandem restoration of corals and sea urchins could increase the efficacy of reef restoration.
在珊瑚礁生态系统衰退的背景下,修复从业者正扩大关注范围,将关键的珊瑚礁群落组成部分(如食草动物)纳入其中,以改善场地条件和恢复后的珊瑚的长期存活率。我们研究了利用孵化场繁殖的刺冠海胆以及另外两种当地数量丰富的海胆物种——多色刺海胆和绿海胆,在美国佛罗里达州进行珊瑚-海胆串联式珊瑚礁修复。海胆被部署到鹿角珊瑚修复的不同阶段的珊瑚礁地块上,并提供人工水泥庇护所,以评估留存率和食草率。海胆的留存率较低,且物种间存在差异。42天后,绿海胆的留存率为22%,刺冠海胆为7%,多色刺海胆为0%。留存率受地块复杂性(修复状态)影响,对于刺冠海胆和绿海胆,在高复杂性地块中的留存率显著更高。在地块内,庇护所类型对海胆留存率没有显著影响。仅当重新安置的绿海胆密度保持>0.4只海胆/平方米时,才观察到大型藻类覆盖度有所降低。第二次部署刺冠海胆时,在放生前将海胆关在笼中一个月,结果海胆留存率显著提高。在笼子里,放牧和珊瑚组织的消耗受海胆密度影响。在低海胆密度(4只海胆/平方米)时,大型藻类覆盖度仍然很高,珊瑚被藻类覆盖。在中等密度(12只海胆/平方米)时,藻类减少,珊瑚生长最大化。在最高密度(40只海胆/平方米)时,藻类覆盖度降低,但海胆因过度放牧导致组织死亡,这突出了将重新安置的海胆维持在适当密度以最大化串联修复效益的重要性。因此,如果能够提高留存率并将海胆维持在中等密度,珊瑚和海胆的串联修复可以提高珊瑚礁修复的效果。