• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A Single-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial Comparing Scalpel Versus Electrocautery for Skin Incision in Young Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy.

作者信息

Hawthorne Jacqueline, Sharma Lokesh, Carroll Rosemary, Freihaut Elizabeth, Miteff Kirstin, O'Neill Christine, Bendinelli Cino

机构信息

Department of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, Australia.

Department of Anaesthesia, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, Australia.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2025 Jun 10;49(7):1828-30. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12651.

DOI:10.1002/wjs.12651
PMID:40495336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12282559/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
A Single-Blind, Randomized, Clinical Trial Comparing Scalpel Versus Electrocautery for Skin Incision in Young Patients Undergoing Thyroidectomy.一项比较手术刀与电灼术用于年轻甲状腺切除术患者皮肤切口的单盲、随机临床试验。
World J Surg. 2025 Jun 10;49(7):1828-30. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12651.
2
Cutting electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术切口使用电刀切割与手术刀切割的比较：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Surg Res. 2017 Dec;220:147-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.093. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
3
Comparison of Colorado Needle Electrocautery and Traditional Scalpel for Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Systematic Review.科罗拉多针状电灼术与传统手术刀在上睑成形术切口中的比较：一项随机对照试验及系统评价
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jun 9;11(6):e5045. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005045. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Comparison of electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in midline abdominal surgery - A double blind randomized controlled trial.电切术与手术刀在中线腹部手术中的比较——一项双盲随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jul;19:78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.085. Epub 2015 May 26.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical skin incisions.电刀与手术刀用于外科切口的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2012 Aug;204(2):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.032. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
6
Comparison of Colorado Needle Electrocautery and Traditional Scalpel for Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial.科罗拉多针状电灼术与传统手术刀在下睑眼袋整形手术切口中的比较：一项随机对照试验
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Nov 22;12(11):e6325. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006325. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Needle-tip electrocautery versus steel scalpel incision in neurosurgery: study protocol for a prospective single-centre randomised controlled double-blind trial.电灼针尖端与钢手术刀切开在神经外科中的比较：一项前瞻性单中心随机对照双盲试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 14;13(11):e073444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073444.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision.系统评价和荟萃分析：比较电切与手术刀用于皮肤切口。
Br J Surg. 2012 May;99(5):613-20. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8708. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
9
Surgical site infection: an observer-blind, randomized trial comparing electrocautery and conventional scalpel.手术部位感染：电灼与传统手术刀盲法随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(7):681-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.064. Epub 2014 May 24.
10
Histologic Comparison of Upper Blepharoplasty Skin Excision Using Scalpel Incision Versus Microdissection Electrocautery Needle Tip Versus Continuous Wave CO2 Laser.使用手术刀切口、显微解剖电灼针尖与连续波二氧化碳激光进行上睑成形术皮肤切除的组织学比较
Dermatol Surg. 2021 Oct 1;47(10):1376-1378. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003178.

本文引用的文献

1
The short-term outcomes of surgical scars in head and neck surgery comparing between surgical blade and geometric electron modulation electrocautery.比较手术刀片和几何电子调制电灼在头颈部手术中对手术疤痕的短期效果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Oct;281(10):5429-5436. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08771-1. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
2
Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale When Used With Postsurgical Scar Photographs.患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表用于术后瘢痕照片时的可靠性
Dermatol Surg. 2018 Dec;44(12):1650-1652. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001479.
3
Diathermy versus Scalpel Incision in a Heterogeneous Cohort of General Surgery Patients in a Nigerian Teaching Hospital.尼日利亚一家教学医院普通外科患者异质性队列中透热疗法与手术刀切口的比较
Niger J Surg. 2015 Jan-Jun;21(1):43-7. doi: 10.4103/1117-6806.153193.
4
Impact of postthyroidectomy scar on the quality of life of thyroid cancer patients.甲状腺切除术后疤痕对甲状腺癌患者生活质量的影响。
Ann Dermatol. 2014 Dec;26(6):693-9. doi: 10.5021/ad.2014.26.6.693. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
5
Sharps injuries: the risks and relevance to plastic surgeons.锐器伤：风险与整形医生的相关性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Apr;131(4):784-791. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818bae.
6
Steel scalpel versus electrocautery blade: comparison of cosmetic and patient satisfaction outcomes of different incision methods.手术刀与电灼刀片：不同切口方法的美容效果及患者满意度比较
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Aug;38(4):427-33.
7
Diathermy vs. scalpel skin incisions in general surgery: double-blind, randomized, clinical trial.普通外科中透热疗法与手术刀皮肤切口的比较：双盲、随机临床试验
World J Surg. 2009 Aug;33(8):1594-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0064-9.