Suppr超能文献

在临床环境中对血浆和以患者为中心的干血微量样本中的支链氨基酸(BCAA)和支链酮酸(BCKA)进行定量分析。

Quantitation of BCAA and BCKA in plasma and patient-centric dried blood microsamples in a clinical setting.

作者信息

Tierney Brendan, Tuttle Pirinka Georgiev, Karahanoglu F Isik, Reyes Christian Russel, Chen Yalei, Blatnik Matthew, Vigil Savon, Ziegenfelder Matthew, Santamaria Mar, Chou Denise E, Williams Bunmi, Gao Anna, Peterson Briana, Adhin Bhavna, Cai Xuemei

机构信息

Pfizer Research & Development, Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.

Pfizer Research & Development, Pfizer, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Bioanalysis. 2025 Jun;17(11):707-723. doi: 10.1080/17576180.2025.2515008. Epub 2025 Jun 10.

Abstract

AIM

This study assessed the agreement and bias of three dried blood patient-centric microsampling (PCS) devices (paper DBS, Mitra, and Tasso-M20) for the quantitation of branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) and ketoacids (BCKAs) compared to venous plasma samples.

MATERIALS & METHODS: Concentrations of BCAAs and BCKAs were measured in samples from generally healthy participants with a validated assay for venous plasma adapted for use with dried blood from the PCS devices. Participants were also asked to respond to a device usability questionnaire about their experience with the devices.

RESULTS

The correlations between BCAA/BCKA concentration values in PCS devices vs venipuncture samples were strong to excellent for all six analytes, across all three PCS devices. The surrogate analyte approach facilitated method transfer from plasma to dried blood microsampling devices. Overall, participants reported that they enjoyed using the devices compared to traditional venipuncture and would be willing to use them again, on their own at-home.

CONCLUSION

These study results demonstrate the feasibility of quantitating BCAAs and BCKAs reliably with PCS devices, with high acceptability from study participants.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了三种以患者为中心的干血微量采样(PCS)设备(纸质干血斑、Mitra和Tasso-M20)与静脉血浆样本相比,用于定量支链氨基酸(BCAAs)和酮酸(BCKAs)的一致性和偏差。

材料与方法

采用一种经过验证的适用于PCS设备干血的静脉血浆检测方法,对一般健康参与者的样本中BCAAs和BCKAs的浓度进行测量。参与者还被要求回答一份关于他们使用这些设备体验的设备可用性问卷。

结果

在所有三种PCS设备中,所有六种分析物的PCS设备与静脉穿刺样本中BCAA/BCKA浓度值之间的相关性都很强至极好。替代分析物方法促进了从血浆到干血微量采样设备的方法转移。总体而言,参与者报告称,与传统静脉穿刺相比,他们喜欢使用这些设备,并且愿意在家中自行再次使用。

结论

这些研究结果证明了使用PCS设备可靠定量BCAAs和BCKAs的可行性,且研究参与者对其接受度很高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31b6/12203846/2e171eda8ad1/IBIO_A_2515008_F0001_OC.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验