Suppr超能文献

仿制药竞争、价格及使用趋势的国际比较:韩国与二十国集团国家

International comparison of generic competition, prices, and usage trends: South Korea and G20 countries.

作者信息

Lee Da Hye, Kim Jung-Ae, Lim Kyung Min, Jung Ji Won, Park Su Min, Jang Yoon-A, Lee Jong Hyuk

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Inje University, Gimhae-si, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 May 27;13:1559823. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1559823. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

While many countries have successfully promoted generic drug use, South Korea faces challenges with low utilization and high expenditure shares, despite various policy reforms. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of generic drug policies in South Korea, by comparing the prices, competition, and usage trends of generic drugs between South Korea and the Group of Twenty (G20) countries.

METHODS

We analyzed 26 off-patent active ingredients marketed in South Korea and G20 countries from 2014 to 2023. Generic drug prices were calculated by dividing total sales by total volume in 2023, with the average price for each country subsequently determined. Generic competition was measured by the number of generic drugs available in each country. The usage trends of generic drugs were assessed using the sales and volume ratios of off-patent original drugs to generic drugs in 2023.

RESULTS

South Korea had more generic drugs for 19 of the 26 analyzed ingredients (73.1%) compared to other G20 countries. However, for recently off-patent ingredients, the number of generic drugs was smaller in South Korea. The generic prices for 18 ingredients (69.2%) were lower in South Korea than in the G20 and Advanced Eight (A8) countries. Similar to the generic competition, generics with larger market sizes had higher prices in South Korea. Conversely, the prices of recently off-patent ingredients were higher in South Korea compared to the G20 countries. For 24 ingredients (92.3%), the sales and volume ratios of generic drugs in South Korea were considerably lower compared to the G20 countries.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that the pharmaceutical policies and regulatory frameworks for generic drug are fragmented and inefficient in South Korea. Consequently, these fragmented and inefficient policies disrupt the virtuous cycle mechanism of generic price and usage driven by effective competition. To address these challenges and promote the use of generic drugs, the findings of this study suggest the need to develop and implement policies in South Korea that focus on optimizing the pharmaceutical expenditure structure, enhancing post-listing price management system for generic drugs, supporting the accelerated development of generic drugs, and promoting the prescription and use of generic drugs.

摘要

引言

尽管许多国家已成功推动仿制药的使用,但韩国尽管进行了各种政策改革,仍面临着利用率低和支出份额高的挑战。本研究旨在通过比较韩国与二十国集团(G20)国家仿制药的价格、竞争和使用趋势,评估韩国仿制药政策的有效性。

方法

我们分析了2014年至2023年在韩国和G20国家销售的26种专利过期的活性成分。2023年的仿制药价格通过总销售额除以总销量来计算,随后确定每个国家的平均价格。仿制药竞争通过每个国家可用的仿制药数量来衡量。使用2023年专利过期的原研药与仿制药的销售和销量比率来评估仿制药的使用趋势。

结果

与其他G20国家相比,韩国在26种分析成分中的19种(73.1%)有更多的仿制药。然而,对于最近专利过期的成分,韩国的仿制药数量较少。18种成分(69.2%)的韩国仿制药价格低于G20和八国集团(A8)国家。与仿制药竞争情况类似,在韩国市场规模较大的仿制药价格更高。相反,与G20国家相比,韩国最近专利过期成分的价格更高。对于24种成分(92.3%),韩国仿制药的销售和销量比率与G20国家相比要低得多。

结论

本研究证实,韩国仿制药的药品政策和监管框架分散且效率低下。因此,这些分散且低效的政策扰乱了由有效竞争驱动的仿制药价格和使用的良性循环机制。为应对这些挑战并促进仿制药的使用,本研究结果表明韩国需要制定和实施侧重于优化药品支出结构、加强仿制药上市后价格管理体系、支持仿制药加速研发以及促进仿制药处方和使用的政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccc2/12150593/02f39c4b20da/fpubh-13-1559823-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验