Suppr超能文献

欧美仿制药市场比较:价格、销量与支出

Comparing Generic Drug Markets in Europe and the United States: Prices, Volumes, and Spending.

作者信息

Wouters Olivier J, Kanavos Panos G, McKEE Martin

机构信息

London School of Economics and Political Science.

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):554-601. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12279.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Policy Points: Our study indicates that there are opportunities for cost savings in generic drug markets in Europe and the United States. Regulators should make it easier for generic drugs to reach the market. Regulators and payers should apply measures to stimulate price competition among generic drugmakers and to increase generic drug use. To meaningfully evaluate policy options, it is important to analyze historical context and understand why similar initiatives failed previously.

CONTEXT

Rising drug prices are putting pressure on health care budgets. Policymakers are assessing how they can save money through generic drugs.

METHODS

We compared generic drug prices and market shares in 13 European countries, using data from 2013, to assess the amount of variation that exists between countries. To place these results in context, we reviewed evidence from recent studies on the prices and use of generics in Europe and the United States. We also surveyed peer-reviewed studies, gray literature, and books published since 2000 to (1) outline existing generic drug policies in European countries and the United States; (2) identify ways to increase generic drug use and to promote price competition among generic drug companies; and (3) explore barriers to implementing reform of generic drug policies, using a historical example from the United States as a case study.

FINDINGS

The prices and market shares of generics vary widely across Europe. For example, prices charged by manufacturers in Switzerland are, on average, more than 2.5 times those in Germany and more than 6 times those in the United Kingdom, based on the results of a commonly used price index. The proportion of prescriptions filled with generics ranges from 17% in Switzerland to 83% in the United Kingdom. By comparison, the United States has historically had low generic drug prices and high rates of generic drug use (84% in 2013), but has in recent years experienced sharp price increases for some off-patent products. There are policy solutions to address issues in Europe and the United States, such as streamlining the generic drug approval process and requiring generic prescribing and substitution where such policies are not yet in place. The history of substitution laws in the United States provides insights into the economic, political, and cultural issues influencing the adoption of generic drug policies.

CONCLUSIONS

Governments should apply coherent supply- and demand-side policies in generic drug markets. An immediate priority is to convince more physicians, pharmacists, and patients that generic drugs are bioequivalent to branded products. Special-interest groups continue to obstruct reform in Europe and the United States.

摘要

未标注

政策要点:我们的研究表明,欧美仿制药市场存在节省成本的机会。监管机构应简化仿制药进入市场的流程。监管机构和支付方应采取措施,刺激仿制药制造商之间的价格竞争,并增加仿制药的使用。为了切实评估政策选项,分析历史背景并理解类似举措此前失败的原因很重要。

背景

药品价格不断上涨给医疗保健预算带来压力。政策制定者正在评估如何通过仿制药省钱。

方法

我们利用2013年的数据,比较了13个欧洲国家的仿制药价格和市场份额,以评估各国之间存在的差异程度。为了更好地理解这些结果,我们回顾了近期欧美关于仿制药价格和使用情况的研究证据。我们还调查了自2000年以来的同行评审研究、灰色文献和书籍,以(1)概述欧美国家现有的仿制药政策;(2)确定增加仿制药使用和促进仿制药公司之间价格竞争的方法;(3)以美国的一个历史案例为研究对象,探讨实施仿制药政策改革的障碍。

研究结果

仿制药的价格和市场份额在欧洲各国差异很大。例如,根据常用价格指数的结果,瑞士制造商收取的价格平均是德国的2.5倍多,是英国的6倍多。用仿制药配药的处方比例从瑞士的17%到英国的83%不等。相比之下,美国历史上仿制药价格较低,仿制药使用率较高(2013年为84%),但近年来一些非专利产品的价格大幅上涨。有一些政策解决方案可以解决欧美存在的问题,比如简化仿制药审批流程,并在尚未实施此类政策的地方要求开仿制药处方和进行替换。美国替代法的历史为影响仿制药政策采用的经济、政治和文化问题提供了见解。

结论

政府应在仿制药市场应用连贯的供需方政策。当务之急是让更多医生、药剂师和患者相信仿制药在生物等效性上与品牌产品相当。特殊利益集团继续在欧美阻碍改革。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0a3/5594322/176f5723af25/MILQ-95-554-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验