• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提升大型集会活动中的公共安全:2022年印度尼西亚坎朱鲁汉体育场灾难

Improving public safety in events of mass gathering: The 2022 Kanjuruhan Stadium Disaster in Indonesia.

作者信息

Wiyono Lowilius, Kresnadi Irfan, Munir Awliya Syamsul, Tannuardi Medhavini, Mirtha Listya Tresnanti

机构信息

Dr. Abdul Aziz General Hospital Singkawang Indonesia.

Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia Jakarta Indonesia.

出版信息

Public Health Chall. 2023 Nov 15;2(4):e139. doi: 10.1002/puh2.139. eCollection 2023 Dec.

DOI:10.1002/puh2.139
PMID:40496796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12039746/
Abstract

The Kanjuruhan tragedy has caused tremendous sorrow for Indonesia and its football history. The incident happened during the match between the Arema and Persebaya football teams that was followed by a chaotic stampede due to supporters' anarchy. The incident caused 135 deaths due to a stampede in the chaotic stadium. However, it has also brought into the limelight several violations and depravity of safety measures that have been neglected by the Indonesian officials and its football association. Despite being banned by FIFA's Safety and Security Regulations, the use of crowd-control gas is hypothesized as one of the key driving factors for the stampede. There were also violations of the evacuation plan with overloaded stadium capacity, lack of safety protocol, and no regard for the disaster management command chain needed in such a situation. Inappropriate security plans, lack of safety officers, lack of a contingency plan in the event of a stampede, and lack of appropriate safe infrastructure contributed to the severity of this incident. We discuss the incident with the possible causes and notable issues in the management of mass gatherings, as well as the might-be solution and precaution for all parties involved, from the evaluation of the use of crowd-control gas, reassessment of safety protocol, and infrastructure to the appropriate response for stampede or any similar situations. The Kanjuruhan tragedy is heart-wrenching, with various issues involved, showing the lack of regulations by the Indonesian government and its football association. However, it might also be an opportunity to learn and inspect all parties to achieve a peaceful and safe football in Indonesia.

摘要

坎朱鲁汉悲剧给印度尼西亚及其足球历史带来了巨大悲痛。该事件发生在阿雷马和佩尔塞巴亚足球队的比赛期间,由于支持者的混乱无序,随后发生了混乱的踩踏事件。这起事件在混乱的体育场内造成了135人因踩踏死亡。然而,它也让印尼官员及其足球协会忽视的几项安全措施违规和堕落行为暴露在聚光灯下。尽管被国际足联的安全与安保规定所禁止,但使用人群控制气体被推测为踩踏事件的关键驱动因素之一。还存在违反疏散计划的情况,包括体育场容量超载、缺乏安全协议,以及无视这种情况下所需的灾害管理指挥链。不恰当的安保计划、缺乏安全人员、在发生踩踏事件时缺乏应急预案,以及缺乏合适的安全基础设施,都加剧了这起事件的严重性。我们讨论了该事件以及大规模集会管理中可能的原因和显著问题,以及对所有相关方可能的解决方案和预防措施,包括对人群控制气体使用的评估、对安全协议的重新评估、基础设施,以及对踩踏事件或任何类似情况的适当应对。坎朱鲁汉悲剧令人心痛,涉及诸多问题,显示出印尼政府及其足球协会缺乏监管。然而,这也可能是一个让各方学习和审视的机会,以在印度尼西亚实现和平、安全的足球环境。

相似文献

1
Improving public safety in events of mass gathering: The 2022 Kanjuruhan Stadium Disaster in Indonesia.提升大型集会活动中的公共安全:2022年印度尼西亚坎朱鲁汉体育场灾难
Public Health Chall. 2023 Nov 15;2(4):e139. doi: 10.1002/puh2.139. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Traumatic asphyxia following stadium crowd surge: stadium factors affecting outcome.体育场人群激增后的创伤性窒息:影响预后的体育场因素
WMJ. 1998 Oct;97(9):42-5.
3
Resumption of professional football league with spectators during the COVID-19 pandemic: The implementation of Bio-secure bubble protocol.在新冠疫情期间恢复有观众的职业足球联赛:生物安全气泡协议的实施
Qatar Med J. 2022 Jul 26;2022(3):31. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2022.31. eCollection 2022.
4
"Is a game really a reason for people to die?" Sentiment and thematic analysis of Twitter-based discourse on Indonesia soccer stampede.“一场比赛真的是人们丧命的理由吗?” 基于推特的关于印尼足球踩踏事件的话语情感与主题分析
AIMS Public Health. 2023 Sep 5;10(4):739-754. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023050. eCollection 2023.
5
FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022 stadium patient evacuation: A system testing simulation-based exercise.2022年卡塔尔世界杯体育场患者疏散:基于系统测试模拟的演习。
Qatar Med J. 2022 Dec 30;2023(1):1. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2023.1. eCollection 2023.
6
The anatomy of stadium disasters: causes, consequences and safeguarding the future from a medical perspective.从医学角度看体育场馆灾难的解剖:原因、后果与未来保障。
Public Health. 2023 Nov;224:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.08.014. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
7
FIFA's approach to doping in football.国际足联对足球运动中使用兴奋剂问题的处理方式。
Br J Sports Med. 2006 Jul;40 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i3-i12. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.027383.
8
Assessment of hospital disaster preparedness for the 2010 FIFA World Cup using an internet-based, long-distance tabletop drill.利用基于互联网的远程桌面演练评估 2010 年国际足联世界杯医院的备灾能力。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011 Jun;26(3):192-5. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X11006443.
9
Optimizing stadium evacuation by integrating geocomputation and affordance theory.通过整合地理计算和可供性理论优化体育场疏散
J Emerg Manag. 2018 Mar/Apr;16(2):81-93. doi: 10.5055/jem.2018.0357.
10
Validation of a Belgian Prediction Model for Patient Encounters at Football Mass Gatherings.验证一个用于预测足球大型集会中患者就诊的比利时预测模型。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Dec;36(6):724-729. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000923. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Spectator medicine at an international mega sports event: Rugby World Cup 2019 in Japan.国际大型体育赛事中的观众医学:2019 年日本橄榄球世界杯。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2020 Nov 24;25(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12199-020-00914-0.
2
Incident Command in the Time of COVID-19.新冠疫情期间的 incident Command(此处“incident Command”可能有误,准确说法可能是“应急指挥”之类,按字面是“事件指挥” )
Lab Med. 2020 Nov 2;51(6):e78-e82. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmaa073.
3
Use of Incident Command System for Disaster Preparedness: A Model for an Emergency Department COVID-19 Response.
运用事故指挥系统进行灾难防备:急诊科应对 COVID-19 的模式。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021 Jun;15(3):e31-e36. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.210. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
4
Mass gathering medicine: event factors predicting patient presentation rates.群体聚集医学:预测患者就诊率的事件因素。
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;11(5):745-52. doi: 10.1007/s11739-015-1387-1. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Exposure to the riot control agent CS and potential health effects: a systematic review of the evidence.接触防暴剂CS及其潜在健康影响:证据的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jan 27;12(2):1397-411. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120201397.
6
Human stampedes: a systematic review of historical and peer-reviewed sources.人类踩踏事件:对历史资料和同行评审资料的系统综述
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3(4):191-5. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181c5b494.