Suppr超能文献

恶性肝门部胆管梗阻中同步与序贯内镜金属双侧支架置入术的直接比较

Direct comparison of simultaneous and sequential endoscopic metallic bilateral stenting in malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

作者信息

Guilmoteau Thomas, Rouquette Olivier, Buisson Anthony, Cambier Sébastien, Abergel Armand, Poincloux Laurent

机构信息

Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand 63000, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.

Department of Gastroenterology, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand 63000, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2025 May 21;31(19):101913. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i19.101913.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic bilateral biliary drainage is a first line palliative treatment for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) but remains technically challenging. The emergence of self-expandable metallic stents carried by an ultra-thin (6 Fr or smaller) delivery system now permits simultaneous bilateral stent placement. To date, only a few studies have compared this new method with conventional sequential bilateral stenting.

AIM

To evaluate a possible superiority of simultaneous "side by side" (SBS) biliary drainage in unresectable MHBO.

METHODS

We identified 135 patients who benefited from bilateral drainage using uncovered self-expandable metallic stents between 2010 and 2023. Among them, 62 benefited from simultaneous SBS bilateral drainage between 2017 and 2023, and 73 benefited from sequential bilateral drainage [38 using "stent in stent" (SIS) technique and 35 using SBS technique between 2010 and 2017].

RESULTS

Technical success was significantly increased in simultaneous drainage compared with sequential drainage (94% 75%, = 0.008). However, simultaneous SBS drainage and sequential SIS drainage had a similar technical success (94% 95%). We observed no differences regarding clinical success, procedure duration and recurrent biliary obstruction rate. Stent patency was shorter in the SIS group compared with the simultaneous group (103 days 144 days). Early adverse events were more frequent in the sequential group (31% 21%, = 0.205), with no differences regarding SIS or SBS technique. Technical failure was associated with a higher rate of infectious fatal adverse events (9.5% 1.7%, = 0.02). Reintervention after recurrent biliary obstruction seems to be more successful after using SBS rather than SIS techniques (83% 75%, = 0.53).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous SBS metallic stent placement using an ultra-thin delivery system was technically easier and as efficient as sequential bilateral stenting in unresectable MHBO to achieve bilateral drainage. The SIS procedure remains a good option in unresectable MHBO.

摘要

背景

内镜下双侧胆管引流是不可切除的恶性肝门部胆管梗阻(MHBO)的一线姑息治疗方法,但在技术上仍具有挑战性。由超薄(6F或更小)输送系统携带的自膨式金属支架的出现,现在允许同时进行双侧支架置入。迄今为止,只有少数研究将这种新方法与传统的序贯双侧支架置入术进行了比较。

目的

评估在不可切除的MHBO中同时“并排”(SBS)胆管引流的可能优势。

方法

我们确定了2010年至2023年间135例受益于使用裸金属自膨式支架进行双侧引流的患者。其中,62例在2017年至2023年间受益于同时进行的SBS双侧引流,73例受益于序贯双侧引流[2010年至2017年间38例使用“支架套支架”(SIS)技术,35例使用SBS技术]。

结果

与序贯引流相比,同时引流的技术成功率显著提高(94%对75%,P = 0.008)。然而,同时进行的SBS引流和序贯SIS引流的技术成功率相似(94%对95%)。我们在临床成功率、手术时间和复发性胆管梗阻率方面未观察到差异。SIS组的支架通畅时间比同时组短(103天对144天)。序贯组的早期不良事件更频繁(31%对21%,P = 0.205),SIS或SBS技术之间无差异。技术失败与感染性致命不良事件的发生率较高相关(9.5%对1.7%,P = 0.02)。复发性胆管梗阻后的再次干预在使用SBS技术后似乎比使用SIS技术更成功(83%对75%,P = 0.53)。

结论

在不可切除的MHBO中,使用超薄输送系统同时进行SBS金属支架置入在技术上更容易,并且与序贯双侧支架置入一样有效,可实现双侧引流。SIS手术在不可切除的MHBO中仍然是一个不错的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7527/12146914/f284e62ae3c5/101913-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验