Hazan E, Fabiani J N, Amoudry C, Baillot F, Mathey J, Neveux J Y
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1977 Mar;70(3):235-41.
To be correctly done, closure of a ventricular septal defect must be sound, and must also avoid damage to the conducting tissue. These two essentials are somewhat contradictory, since in order to avoid the bundle of His in its position along the postero-inferior edge of the ventricular septal defect (VSD) in the membranous septum, the sutures inserted into this region must be superficial, and therefore weak. It is for this reason that the published series continue to show evidence of a significant number of post-operative shunts and atrio-ventricular blocks, as much in the closure of isolated VSDs as in the treatment of Fallot's tetralogy. This paper compares two techniques of suturing the prosthetic material which is used to close the VSD: the classical technique, in which it is intended to avoid the bundle of His by working below it, on the right side of the interventricular septum, and a different technique in which the sutures are applied directly to the free edge of the interventricular communication.
要正确完成室间隔缺损的闭合,封堵必须牢固,同时还必须避免损伤传导组织。这两个基本要求在一定程度上相互矛盾,因为为了避开位于膜周部室间隔缺损(VSD)后下缘的希氏束,在此区域插入的缝线必须表浅,因而不牢固。正是由于这个原因,已发表的系列研究仍显示,无论是在孤立性室间隔缺损的封堵中,还是在法洛四联症的治疗中,都有相当数量的术后分流和房室传导阻滞的证据。本文比较了两种用于闭合室间隔缺损的人工材料缝合技术:传统技术,即在室间隔右侧希氏束下方操作以避开希氏束;另一种不同的技术是将缝线直接应用于室间隔交通的游离缘。