Terman Samuel W, Josephson Colin Bruce, Goyal Parag, Gonzalez-Izquierdo Arturo, Morrison Jean, Denaxas Spiros, Wiebe Samuel
Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Neurology. 2025 Jul 8;105(1):e213640. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213640. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
While lamotrigine is an effective, well-tolerated antiseizure medication (ASM), a recent warning raised the possibility of ventricular arrhythmias. We compared arrhythmia incidence between patients newly treated for seizures with lamotrigine and those with levetiracetam (presumed cardiac-inert control).
We included patients whose first ASM prescription fill was after the first seizure or epilepsy ICD code in the study period, with no ASM in the previous year. We conducted retrospective cohort studies to emulate a target trial using 2 datasets: (1) 2009-2018 Medicare claims (United States) and (2) Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a population-based cohort (United Kingdom). We examined cumulative incidence curves for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF) from Cox proportional hazard models.
We included 40,554 patients (lamotrigine: 3,038; levetiracetam: 37,516) from Medicare and 13,098 (lamotrigine: 8,694; levetiracetam: 4,404) from CPRD. In Medicare, the median (interquartile range) age was 61 (44-74) years and 60% were female in the lamotrigine group vs 74 (65-82) years and 57% female in the levetiracetam group. In CPRD, the median (interquartile range) age was 34 (23-53) years and 63% were female in the lamotrigine group vs 48 (29-66) years and 50% female in the levetiracetam group. After adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and medication use, the hazard ratio for VT/VF comparing patients whose first ASM was lamotrigine vs levetiracetam was 0.73 (95% CI 0.50-1.08) for Medicare and 0.75 (95% CI 0.35-1.59) for CPRD, with a 2-year cumulative incidence of 1.7% (95% CI 1.0%-2.3%) vs 2.3% (95% CI 2.1%-2.4%) for Medicare and 0.2% (95% CI 0.1%-0.4%) vs 0.3% (95% CI 0.2%-0.6%) for CPRD. In both datasets, lamotrigine showed a slightly but nonsignificantly lower 2-year absolute difference in cumulative incidence of VT/VF compared with levetiracetam (Medicare: -0.6%, 95% CI -1.2% to 0.0%; CPRD: -0.1%, 95% CI -0.3% to 0.1%). Numerous sensitivity analyses modifying the outcome (atrial arrhythmias or any arrhythmias), censorship procedure (further censoring patients on discontinuing their initial ASM akin to a "per-protocol" analysis), or population (patients with existing cardiovascular diagnoses) found similar results.
These data do not support concerns regarding lamotrigine increasing arrhythmias. Limitations include possible residual confounding and lack of generalizability to other populations.
This study provides Class III evidence that lamotrigine compared with levetiracetam did not significantly increase the 2-year cumulative incidence of VT/VF in adult patients with epilepsy.
虽然拉莫三嗪是一种有效且耐受性良好的抗癫痫药物(ASM),但最近的一项警告提出了室性心律失常的可能性。我们比较了新接受拉莫三嗪治疗癫痫的患者与接受左乙拉西坦治疗的患者(假定为心脏惰性对照)之间的心律失常发生率。
我们纳入了在研究期间首次癫痫发作或癫痫ICD编码后首次开具ASM处方的患者,且前一年未使用ASM。我们进行了回顾性队列研究,以使用两个数据集模拟一项目标试验:(1)2009 - 2018年医疗保险索赔数据(美国)和(2)临床实践研究数据链(CPRD),这是一个基于人群的队列(英国)。我们通过Cox比例风险模型检查室性心动过速或颤动(VT/VF)的累积发病率曲线。
我们纳入了来自医疗保险的40,554名患者(拉莫三嗪组:3,038名;左乙拉西坦组:37,516名)和来自CPRD的13,098名患者(拉莫三嗪组:8,694名;左乙拉西坦组:4,404名)。在医疗保险数据中,拉莫三嗪组的年龄中位数(四分位间距)为61岁(44 - 74岁),女性占60%;左乙拉西坦组的年龄中位数为74岁(65 - 82岁),女性占比57%。在CPRD数据中,拉莫三嗪组的年龄中位数(四分位间距)为34岁(23 - 53岁),女性占63%;左乙拉西坦组的年龄中位数为48岁(29 - 66岁),女性占比50%。在调整了人口统计学、合并症和药物使用情况后,医疗保险数据中,首次使用拉莫三嗪与左乙拉西坦的患者相比,VT/VF的风险比为0.73(95%CI 0.50 - 1.08);CPRD数据中为0.75(95%CI 0.35 - 1.59)。医疗保险数据中2年累积发病率分别为1.7%(95%CI 1.0% - 2.3%)和2.3%(95%CI 2.1% - 2.4%);CPRD数据中分别为0.2%(95%CI 0.1% - 0.4%)和0.3%(95%CI 0.2% - 0.6%)。在两个数据集中,与左乙拉西坦相比,拉莫三嗪在VT/VF累积发病率的2年绝对差异上均略低但无显著差异(医疗保险数据:-0.6%,95%CI -1.2%至0.0%;CPRD数据:-0.1%,95%CI -0.3%至0.1%)。许多敏感性分析对结局(房性心律失常或任何心律失常)、审查程序(进一步审查停止初始ASM治疗的患者,类似于“符合方案”分析)或人群(已有心血管诊断的患者)进行了调整,结果相似。
这些数据不支持关于拉莫三嗪增加心律失常的担忧。局限性包括可能存在残余混杂因素以及缺乏对其他人群的普遍性。
本研究提供了III类证据,表明与左乙拉西坦相比,拉莫三嗪在成年癫痫患者中并未显著增加VT/VF的2年累积发病率。