Suppr超能文献

分子肿瘤学专家委员会治疗建议的真实世界结果

Real-World Outcomes of Molecular Tumor Board Treatment Recommendations.

作者信息

Nichetti Federico, Brambilla Marta, Duca Matteo, Piccolo Alberta, Miliziano Daniela, Cavalli Chiara, Marra Francesca, Ambrosini Paolo, Zanella Caterina, Vernieri Claudio, Lorenzini Daniele, Colombo Elena, Damian Silvia, Baili Paolo, Proto Claudia, Busico Adele, Conca Elena, Capone Iolanda, Manoukian Siranoush, Tamborini Elena, Perrone Federica, Niger Monica, Vingiani Andrea, Agnelli Luca, de Braud Filippo, Pruneri Giancarlo

机构信息

Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Computational Oncology Group, Molecular Precision Oncology Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Jun;9:e2400387. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00387. Epub 2025 Jun 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) is an important tool for the selection of molecularly targeted agents (MTAs), but its clinical utility is unconfirmed in real-world practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We explored the clinical relevance of MTAs in patients discussed by the MTB of the National Cancer Institute of Milan. Patients were stratified into eligible (ie, at least one actionable molecular alteration identified) and treated with MTA (group A), eligible but not treated (group B), or not eligible (group C). Cases for whom a European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets IA tier target was identified were excluded from this analysis and managed as per clinical practice. The study end points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and PFSratio, defined as PFS on MTA/PFS on the last previous treatment in group A.

RESULTS

As of November 2022, 1,813 cases were discussed, of which 458 (25.2%) were potentially eligible to MTA and 117 (6.4%) started treatment. The median PFS on MTA was 12.0 months and the median PFSratio in patients receiving MTA as >1 line of treatment was 2.71, with a benefit rate of 64%. OS was significantly longer in group A than in B and C metastatic patients (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.21 and 1.71 in group B and C, respectively; < .001).

CONCLUSION

Efforts should be pursued to offer MTB-driven therapies, as eligible patients who did not receive MTA showed a significantly poorer prognosis.

摘要

目的

分子肿瘤委员会(MTB)是选择分子靶向药物(MTA)的重要工具,但其临床实用性在实际临床实践中尚未得到证实。

材料与方法

我们探讨了米兰国立癌症研究所MTB讨论的患者中MTA的临床相关性。患者被分为符合条件(即至少发现一种可操作的分子改变)并接受MTA治疗的患者(A组)、符合条件但未接受治疗的患者(B组)或不符合条件的患者(C组)。对于确定为欧洲医学肿瘤学会分子靶点临床可操作性量表IA级靶点的病例,排除在本分析之外,并按照临床实践进行管理。研究终点为总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和PFS比值,PFS比值定义为A组中MTA治疗的PFS/上次治疗的PFS。

结果

截至2022年11月,共讨论了1813例病例,其中458例(25.2%)可能符合MTA治疗条件,117例(6.4%)开始治疗。MTA治疗的中位PFS为12.0个月,接受MTA作为一线以上治疗的患者的中位PFS比值为2.71,获益率为64%。A组的OS明显长于B组和C组的转移性患者(B组和C组的调整后风险比分别为2.21和1.71;P<0.001)。

结论

应努力提供MTB驱动的治疗,因为未接受MTA治疗的符合条件患者的预后明显较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f873/12175791/587cc134b0cc/po-9-e2400387-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验