Ní Chathasaigh Caitríona M, Dunne Emma A, Geraghty Lucy E, O'Donnell Colm P F, Curley Anna E, Currain Eoin O
Department of Neonatology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Neonatology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Ireland.
Resuscitation. 2025 Sep;214:110674. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110674. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
Supervisors of intubation mostly rely on feedback from operators to guide intubation attempts using direct laryngoscopy (DL). In contrast, when using video laryngoscopy (VL), supervisors share the operators' view of the airway during intubation attempts which may allow for better guidance. We wished to analyse the instructions given by supervisors during neonatal VL intubation and assess whether they prompted operators to perform the desired actions.
We reviewed video recordings of neonatal intubations that combined the airway views captured with VL, synchronised with external video and audio recording of the procedure. We performed a thematic analysis of the supervisors' instructions and assessed whether they prompted the intended actions.
We analysed 59 intubation attempts and 158 instructions from 14 supervisors. We identified five main themes: adjusting the position of the laryngoscope blade, identifying anatomical landmarks, aligning the airway axes, introducing the endotracheal tube, and general guidance. Most instructions focused on the lift manoeuvre-aimed at aligning the oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal axes-but lacked clarity, and so were frequently misunderstood. Anatomical landmarks were seldom referenced. Two-step instructions often failed to elicit the desired actions. Overall, 47% of instructions prompted the intended actions. Based on our findings, we developed a proforma to support the supervision of neonatal intubation using VL.
Supervisor instructions during neonatal intubation with VL often lacked precision and clarity, with fewer than half resulting in the desired action. Improved communication is needed to optimise intubation attempts using VL.
气管插管的监督者大多依靠操作者的反馈来指导使用直接喉镜(DL)进行插管尝试。相比之下,在使用视频喉镜(VL)时,监督者在插管尝试过程中可以看到操作者所看到的气道视野,这可能有助于更好地指导。我们希望分析监督者在新生儿VL插管过程中给出的指示,并评估这些指示是否促使操作者采取了预期的行动。
我们回顾了新生儿插管的视频记录,这些记录结合了VL采集的气道视野,并与该操作的外部视频和音频记录同步。我们对监督者的指示进行了主题分析,并评估这些指示是否促使了预期的行动。
我们分析了14名监督者的59次插管尝试和158条指示。我们确定了五个主要主题:调整喉镜叶片的位置、识别解剖标志、对齐气道轴线、插入气管导管以及一般指导。大多数指示集中在旨在对齐口腔、咽和喉轴线的抬起动作上,但缺乏清晰度,因此经常被误解。很少提及解剖标志。两步指示往往未能引发预期的行动。总体而言,47%的指示促使了预期的行动。基于我们的发现,我们制定了一个模板来支持使用VL对新生儿插管进行监督。
在新生儿VL插管过程中,监督者的指示往往缺乏精确性和清晰度,不到一半的指示能产生预期的行动。需要改善沟通以优化使用VL的插管尝试。