Ellis Jeremy R, Will Elizabeth, Ogurtsova Aleksandra, Engle Logan L, Taube Janis M, Sunshine Joel C
Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Bloomberg∼Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; The Mark Foundation Center for Advanced Genomics and Imaging, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lab Invest. 2025 Jun 9;105(10):104203. doi: 10.1016/j.labinv.2025.104203.
Sialic acids are overexpressed in many cancers, and binding of sialic acid via sialic acid binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (Siglecs) may contribute significantly to immune evasion and cancer progression. This important resistance mechanism in the tumor immune microenvironment has been understudied, partially due to the lack of useful reagents. Here, we developed and optimized an immunohistochemistry staining protocol for novel reagents that detect 3 types of Siglec-engaging sialoglycans (HYDRA-3, -7, and -9, which detect sialoglycans recognized by Siglec-3, -7, and -9, respectively) in the tumor immune microenvironment. We evaluated HYDRA staining across 10 different cancer types across whole slides, finding that HYDRA-9 exhibited the highest overall staining range, with HYDRA-3 and -7 showing lower to moderate staining across all tested tumor types. To correlate HYDRA staining patterns and immune infiltration in melanoma, we stained melanoma tissue microarrays with the 3 HYDRA reagents and compared HYDRA staining profiles with a 6-plex multiplex immunofluorescence panel targeting CD8, CD163, FoxP3, PD1, PDL1, and Sox10/S100. Siglec-3 and -9 sialoglycan ligand expression negatively correlated with CD8 T cell infiltration (r = -0.28/P = .002 and r = -0.29/P = .001, respectively), particularly at the tumor-stromal interface (r = -0.37/P < .001 and r = -0.44/P < .001, respectively). Additionally, a high ratio of Siglec-3 and -9 ligand expression at the tumor-stromal interface versus the tumor core was associated with reduced overall survival (Hazard's ratio: 2.60 and 2.11, respectively), whereas CD8 infiltration was not associated with survival outcomes in our cohort. Taken together, the expression levels and spatial distribution of Siglec-engaging sialoglycans may play a role in patient prognosis, potentially representing a biomarker of survival that is independent of conventional metrics of an inflamed tumor microenvironment. This study highlights the need for further investigation of Siglec ligand expression as a predictive and prognostic biomarker of treatment response and resistance.
唾液酸在许多癌症中过度表达,通过唾液酸结合免疫球蛋白样凝集素(Siglecs)与唾液酸结合可能对免疫逃逸和癌症进展有显著贡献。肿瘤免疫微环境中的这一重要抗性机制尚未得到充分研究,部分原因是缺乏有用的试剂。在此,我们开发并优化了一种免疫组织化学染色方案,用于检测肿瘤免疫微环境中3种与Siglec结合的唾液酸聚糖(HYDRA - 3、- 7和- 9,分别检测被Siglec - 3、- 7和- 9识别的唾液酸聚糖)的新型试剂。我们在整个载玻片上评估了10种不同癌症类型的HYDRA染色,发现HYDRA - 9的总体染色范围最高,HYDRA - 3和- 7在所有测试肿瘤类型中显示出较低至中等的染色。为了关联黑色素瘤中HYDRA染色模式与免疫浸润,我们用3种HYDRA试剂对黑色素瘤组织微阵列进行染色,并将HYDRA染色谱与靶向CD8、CD163、FoxP3、PD1、PDL1和Sox10/S100的6重多重免疫荧光面板进行比较。Siglec - 3和- 9唾液酸聚糖配体表达与CD8 T细胞浸润呈负相关(分别为r = - 0.28/P = 0.002和r = - 0.29/P = 0.001),特别是在肿瘤-基质界面(分别为r = - 0.37/P < 0.001和r = - 0.44/P < 0.001)。此外,肿瘤-基质界面与肿瘤核心处Siglec - 3和- 9配体表达的高比率与总生存期降低相关(风险比分别为2.60和2.11),而在我们的队列中CD8浸润与生存结果无关。综上所述,与Siglec结合的唾液酸聚糖的表达水平和空间分布可能在患者预后中起作用,可能代表一种独立于炎症肿瘤微环境传统指标的生存生物标志物。这项研究强调需要进一步研究Siglec配体表达作为治疗反应和抗性的预测和预后生物标志物。