Lee Jun-Bum, Ben Hui, Ryu Seung Min, Park Ji Yeon, Park Dong-Jun, Cho Chang-Ho, Park Jeong Hee, Koh Kyoung-Hwan, Jeon In-Ho
Department of Orthop Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.05.001.
Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography is used to evaluate tissue vascularity across various surgical fields. However, ICG has not been widely used in rotator cuff tendon surgery, which involves poorly vascularized tissue. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of ICG-guided arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) to evaluate the vasculature of the débridement margin and the tendon-bone interface and compared it with the conventional arthroscopic technique.
Patients with small-sized to medium-sized rotator cuff tears were recruited from February 2020 to February 2022 and were randomly assigned to either the ICG-guided RCR group or the conventional RCR group, with 32 patients in each group. Standard arthroscopic RCR was performed in both groups; however, in the ICG group, ICG was administered intravenously during surgery to assess blood perfusion in the tissue. Tear margin débridement was conducted while monitoring the enhancement of ICG, and suturing was performed after confirming the blood supply at the tendon-bone interface. The primary outcome was the retear rate, determined using the Sugaya classification based on magnetic resonance imaging conducted 6 months postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included the range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures, such as American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score (CMS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and pain visual analog scale (VAS), as well as the prevalence of complications. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for all patient-reported outcomes at 12 months postoperatively was determined using a distribution-based method.
A total of 58 patients completed the trial and were included in the analysis. The mean age was 64.8 years (range, 48-82 years). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups at baseline. The retear rate was 0% in the ICG group and 6.9% in the control group (P = .150). At 6 months postoperatively, pain VAS at 6 months postoperatively was significantly lower in the ICG group (P = .003). At 12-month follow-up, 24 patients (82.7%) for pain VAS, 27 (93.1%) for ASES, 19 (65.6%) for CMS, and 25 (86.2%) for SANE achieved MCID in the ICG group and 23 patients (79.3%) for pain VAS, 25 (86.2%) for ASES, 19 (65.6%) for CMS, and 22 (75.8%) for SANE achieved MCID in the conventional group. Neither group showed operation-related complications.
ICG-guided arthroscopic RCR showed greater improvement in pain VAS at 6 months postoperatively compared to the conventional RCR group and demonstrated comparable outcomes in achieving the MCID at 1 year. Moreover, the procedure was performed safely without any adverse effects.
吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光血管造影术用于评估各个手术区域的组织血管情况。然而,ICG尚未广泛应用于肩袖肌腱手术,该手术涉及血管化较差的组织。在本研究中,我们调查了ICG引导下关节镜肩袖修复术(RCR)评估清创边缘和肌腱-骨界面血管系统的疗效,并将其与传统关节镜技术进行比较。
2020年2月至2022年2月招募了小型至中型肩袖撕裂患者,随机分为ICG引导RCR组或传统RCR组,每组32例患者。两组均进行标准关节镜RCR;然而,在ICG组中,手术期间静脉注射ICG以评估组织中的血液灌注。在监测ICG增强的同时进行撕裂边缘清创,并在确认肌腱-骨界面的血液供应后进行缝合。主要结局是再撕裂率,根据术后6个月进行的磁共振成像采用Sugaya分类法确定。次要结局包括活动范围和患者报告的结局指标,如美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分、Constant-Murley评分(CMS)、单评估数字评价(SANE)和疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS),以及并发症的发生率。术后12个月所有患者报告结局的最小临床重要差异(MCID)采用基于分布的方法确定。
共有58例患者完成试验并纳入分析。平均年龄为64.8岁(范围48 - 82岁)。两组在基线时无显著差异。ICG组的再撕裂率为0%,对照组为6.9%(P = 0.150)。术后6个月,ICG组术后6个月的疼痛VAS显著更低(P = 0.003)。在12个月随访时,ICG组中疼痛VAS有24例(82.7%)、ASES有27例(93.1%)、CMS有19例(65.6%)、SANE有25例(86.2%)达到MCID,传统组中疼痛VAS有23例(79.3%)、ASES有25例(86.2%)、CMS有19例(65.6%)、SANE有22例(75.8%)达到MCID。两组均未出现手术相关并发症。
与传统RCR组相比,ICG引导下关节镜RCR术后6个月疼痛VAS改善更大,且在1年时达到MCID的结局相当。此外,该手术安全进行,无任何不良反应。