Shetty Sahana, Suvarna Renuka, Ambrose Fistus Vanessa, Modi Shivam, Pappachan Joseph M
Department of Endocrinology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Department of Medicine, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Preston PR2 9HT, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
World J Hepatol. 2025 May 27;17(5):105706. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.105706.
BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are independent risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and an exaggerated CVD risk is expected when both diseases co-exist. Therefore, thorough risk stratification is important to inform better clinical practice decisions based on good quality evidence for patient with MAFLD and T2DM. AIM: To identify the CVD and cardiovascular event (CVE) risk in a systematic review when MAFLD and T2DM co-exist to inform better clinical practice decisions. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by compiling data by searching PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. Quality appraisal of retrieved studies and the meta-analysis were performed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool and RevMan 5.4 software respectively. The effect indicators for CVE and CVD risk were expressed as odds ratios (OR) and 95%CI with -values < 0.05 as significant. RESULTS: Fourteen (5 cohort and 9 cross-sectional) studies with 370013 participants were included in this review. The meta-analysis of CVE showed that the risk of CVE in T2DM was higher in the MAFLD group when compared to the non-MAFLD group [OR 1.28 (95%CI, 1.04-1.56) = 0.02] with follow up duration ranging between 5-6 years. The prevalence of CVD in the metanalysis of cross-sectional studies was found to be higher [OR 1.47 (95%CI, 1.21-1.78) = 0.0001] in T2DM with MAFLD when compared to T2DM without MAFLD. Significant heterogeneity exists due to variations in study design, methodologies, and MAFLD diagnostic criteria, which may have influenced the study's findings. CONCLUSION: The presence of MAFLD in T2DM increased the risk of CVE. The prevalence of CVD is higher in T2DM with MAFLD as compared to T2DM without MAFLD. Large well-designed multicentric long-term prospective studies are necessary to appropriately risk stratify the cardiovascular effect of the MAFLD in T2DM patients.
背景:代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病(MAFLD)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)是心血管疾病(CVD)发生的独立危险因素,当这两种疾病共存时,预计心血管疾病风险会更高。因此,基于高质量证据对MAFLD和T2DM患者进行全面的风险分层,对于做出更好的临床实践决策非常重要。 目的:通过系统评价确定MAFLD和T2DM共存时的CVD及心血管事件(CVE)风险,以指导更好的临床实践决策。 方法:通过检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库收集数据进行系统评价。分别使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)工具和RevMan 5.4软件对检索到的研究进行质量评估和荟萃分析。CVE和CVD风险的效应指标以比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)表示,P值<0.05为有统计学意义。 结果:本综述纳入了14项研究(5项队列研究和9项横断面研究),共370013名参与者。CVE的荟萃分析显示,与非MAFLD组相比,MAFLD组T2DM患者的CVE风险更高[OR 1.28(95%CI,1.04 - 1.56),P = 0.02],随访时间为5至6年。横断面研究的荟萃分析发现,与无MAFLD的T2DM患者相比,合并MAFLD的T2DM患者的CVD患病率更高[OR 1.47(95%CI,1.21 - 1.78),P = 0.0001]。由于研究设计、方法和MAFLD诊断标准的差异,存在显著的异质性,这可能影响了研究结果。 结论:T2DM患者中MAFLD的存在增加了CVE风险。与无MAFLD的T2DM患者相比,合并MAFLD的T2DM患者的CVD患病率更高。有必要开展大型、设计良好的多中心长期前瞻性研究,以对T2DM患者中MAFLD的心血管效应进行适当的风险分层。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024-12-5
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2023-1
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024-12-30
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024-9-28
Liver Int. 2024-7