Suppr超能文献

两种感染梭鲈(L.)鳃部的粘孢子虫寄生虫的形态学和系统发育比较:[寄生虫名称1]和[寄生虫名称2] 。 (你原文中此处两种寄生虫名称缺失,我按格式补充了)

Morphological and phylogenetic comparison of two myxozoan parasites infecting the gills of pikeperch ( L.): and .

作者信息

Colunga-Ramírez Graciela, Sellyei Boglárka, Molnár Kálmán, Székely Csaba, Cech Gábor

机构信息

HUN-REN Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary.

Doctoral School of Animal Biotechnology and Animal Science, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary.

出版信息

Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2025 May 26;27:101087. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2025.101087. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

and have been reported as spore-forming plasmodia infecting the gills of pikeperch. However, the latter has been documented to have a broader host range. Some remarkable differences have been observed between both species: the shape and size of plasmodia and the length of their caudal appendages. To date, no molecular evidence has been provided for . ; while for . , the 18S rDNA has been applied for its classification. In this study, we analysed morphological and molecular data to elucidate the relationship of . and . collected from the gills of the pikeperch. Morphologically, . gigantea resulted in a cluster of plasmodia-forming cyst bodies, while . have been mostly reported as small plasmodia. The myxospores of the two species were distinguished by the length of their caudal appendages, which were longer in . than in . (77-100 vs 14.4-40.1 μm). The rest of the spore characters are similar in both species. The 18S and 28S rDNA sequences show low sequence distance ≤0.76 % and 0.97 %, respectively. The data presented in this study, in conjunction with those collected from previous literature, suggests that caudal appendages may exhibit phenotypic plasticity within species, which must be considered before including new members of the genus. Furthermore, ribosomal DNA sequences serve as an essential tool for referring the taxonomic classification of myxozoans that exhibit phenotypic plasticity. We propose that . be reclassified as . .

摘要

并且已有报道称形成孢子的多核体感染了梭鲈的鳃。然而,后者已被证明具有更广泛的宿主范围。在这两个物种之间观察到了一些显著差异:多核体的形状和大小以及它们尾附属物的长度。迄今为止,尚未为……提供分子证据;而对于……,18S rDNA已被用于其分类。在本研究中,我们分析了形态学和分子数据,以阐明从梭鲈鳃中采集的……和……之间的关系。在形态上,巨型……形成了一团形成多核体的囊状体,而……大多被报道为小的多核体。这两个物种的粘孢子通过其尾附属物的长度来区分,……中的尾附属物比……中的更长(77 - 100微米对14.4 - 40.1微米)。两个物种的孢子其他特征相似。18S和28S rDNA序列显示出较低的序列距离,分别≤0.76%和0.97%。本研究中呈现的数据,结合从先前文献中收集的数据,表明尾附属物在物种内可能表现出表型可塑性,在纳入该属新成员之前必须予以考虑。此外,核糖体DNA序列是参考具有表型可塑性的粘孢子虫分类学分类的重要工具。我们建议将……重新分类为……。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1609/12158606/aa0ce6901980/ga1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验