• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖患者食管裂孔大小与反流性食管炎及Ⅰ型食管裂孔疝的相关性

Association of esophageal hiatus size with reflux esophagitis and type I hiatal hernia in patients with obesity.

作者信息

Qi Zhong, Shi Xiao-Chen, Yan Wen-Mao, Bai Ri-Xing

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China.

出版信息

World J Radiol. 2025 May 28;17(5):106333. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i5.106333.

DOI:10.4329/wjr.v17.i5.106333
PMID:40503476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12149973/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chinese surgeons often rely on intraoperative exploration of the esophageal hiatus to determine the need for concurrent type I hiatal hernia (HH) repair during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. However, no standardized criteria for the esophageal hiatus size or indications for exploration exist in China.

AIM

To investigate normal anatomical parameter ranges of the esophageal hiatus in patients with obesity.

METHODS

A total of 158 patients, aged 20-49 years, was analyzed from January 2020 to June 2024. The patients were classified into the no reflux esophagitis (RE) no HH group (HHG), RE group, and type I HHG. The transverse and sagittal diameters and cross-sectional area of the esophageal hiatus were measured using multiplanar reconstruction of the computed tomography images.

RESULTS

Body mass index was positively correlated with area and transverse and sagittal diameters of the esophageal hiatus ( = 0.72, 0.69, and 0.54, respectively; < 0.01). In the no RE no HHG and RE group, the esophageal hiatus size in the subgroup with obesity was greater than that in the non-obesity subgroup (area: 326.15 ± 78 mm 208.12 ± 64.44 mm, transverse diameters: 15.97 ± 2.06 mm 13.37 ± 1.99 mm, sagittal diameters: 15.7 ± 2.08 mm 11.73 ± 2.08 mm; < 0.01). Patients with obesity showed no significant differences in esophageal hiatus size with or without RE or HH.

CONCLUSION

The esophageal hiatus size increased with body mass index and was larger in patients with obesity than in those without obesity.

摘要

背景

中国外科医生在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术期间,常依靠术中对食管裂孔的探查来确定是否需要同时进行Ⅰ型食管裂孔疝(HH)修复。然而,中国尚无关于食管裂孔大小的标准化标准或探查指征。

目的

探讨肥胖患者食管裂孔的正常解剖参数范围。

方法

分析2020年1月至2024年6月期间的158例年龄在20 - 49岁的患者。将患者分为无反流性食管炎(RE)无HH组(HHG)、RE组和Ⅰ型HHG组。使用计算机断层扫描图像的多平面重建测量食管裂孔的横径、矢状径和横截面积。

结果

体重指数与食管裂孔的面积、横径和矢状径呈正相关(分别为r = 0.72、0.69和0.54;P < 0.01)。在无RE无HHG组和RE组中,肥胖亚组的食管裂孔大小大于非肥胖亚组(面积:326.15±78mm²对208.12±64.44mm²,横径:15.97±2.06mm对13.37±1.99mm,矢状径:15.7±2.08mm对11.73±2.08mm;P < 0.01)。肥胖患者无论有无RE或HH,食管裂孔大小均无显著差异。

结论

食管裂孔大小随体重指数增加而增大,肥胖患者的食管裂孔大于非肥胖患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac94/12149973/5d23c934265a/106333-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac94/12149973/e27abb505dba/106333-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac94/12149973/0a6cc663a3e0/106333-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac94/12149973/5d23c934265a/106333-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac94/12149973/e27abb505dba/106333-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac94/12149973/0a6cc663a3e0/106333-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac94/12149973/5d23c934265a/106333-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of esophageal hiatus size with reflux esophagitis and type I hiatal hernia in patients with obesity.肥胖患者食管裂孔大小与反流性食管炎及Ⅰ型食管裂孔疝的相关性
World J Radiol. 2025 May 28;17(5):106333. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i5.106333.
2
Multiplanar MDCT measurement of esophageal hiatus surface area: association with hiatal hernia and GERD.食管裂孔表面积的多平面MDCT测量:与食管裂孔疝和胃食管反流病的关联
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2465-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4499-9. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
3
High-resolution 3-dimensional tomography may be a useful tool for understanding the anatomy of hiatal hernias and surgical planning of patients eligible for laparoscopic or robotic antireflux surgery.高分辨率 3 维断层成像可能是一种有用的工具,有助于理解裂孔疝的解剖结构,并为有资格接受腹腔镜或机器人抗反流手术的患者制定手术计划。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):780-786. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10599-5. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
4
Evaluation of Anterior Phrenoesophageal Ligament Preservation During Hiatus Hernia Repair in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as an Anti-Reflux Measure.评价腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中裂孔疝修补时保留前膈食管韧带作为抗反流措施的效果。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 May;31(5):507-514. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0018. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
5
Esophageal motility in patients with sliding hiatal hernia with reflux esophagitis.滑动性食管裂孔疝伴反流性食管炎患者的食管动力
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 May 20;121(10):898-903.
6
Hiatal Hernia is More Frequent than Expected in Bariatric Patients. Intraoperative Findings during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.食管裂孔疝在肥胖症患者中比预期更常见。腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术中发现。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2019 Nov-Dec;114(6):779-789. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.114.6.779.
7
Effect of hiatus hernia on reflux patterns and mucosal integrity in patients with non-erosive reflux disease.食管裂孔疝对非糜烂性反流病患者反流模式和黏膜完整性的影响。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Nov;34(11):e14412. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14412. Epub 2022 May 20.
8
The size of the esophageal hiatus in gastroesophageal reflux pathophysiology: outcome of intraoperative measurements.食管裂孔在胃食管反流病理生理学中的大小:术中测量的结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jan;14(1):38-44. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1047-8. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
9
Simultaneous sleeve gastrectomy and hiatus hernia repair: a systematic review.同期袖状胃切除术与食管裂孔疝修补术:一项系统评价
Obes Surg. 2015 Jan;25(1):159-66. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1470-0.
10
[Higher prevalence of obesity in erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease].[糜烂性胃食管反流病中肥胖的患病率更高]
Arq Gastroenterol. 2009 Jan-Mar;46(1):15-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032009000100008.

本文引用的文献

1
SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of hiatal hernias.SAGES 食管裂孔疝手术治疗指南。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):4765-4775. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11092-3. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, intrathoracic sleeve migration and its management: A case series and review of literature.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后,胸腔内袖状胃移位及其处理:病例系列报道与文献综述
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Oct-Dec;19(4):544-547. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_149_22.
3
Comment on: Impact of concurrent hiatal hernia repair during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on patient-reported gastroesophageal reflux symptoms: a state-wide analysis.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Jun;19(6):666-667. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.01.012. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
4
The effect of age and sex on esophageal hiatal surface area among normal North American adults using multidetector computed tomography.多排螺旋 CT 测量北美正常成年人食管裂孔面积的年龄和性别差异。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2022 Jun;44(6):899-906. doi: 10.1007/s00276-022-02957-0. Epub 2022 May 24.
5
Staple Line Intrathoracic Migration After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Correlation between Symptoms, CT Three-Dimensional Stomach Analysis, and 24-h pH Monitoring.袖状胃切除术后吻合钉线的胸内移位:症状、CT三维胃部分析与24小时pH监测之间的相关性
Obes Surg. 2022 Jul;32(7):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06074-0. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
The Impact of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients with Morbid Obesity.袖状胃切除术对病态肥胖患者胃食管反流病的影响。
Obes Surg. 2022 Mar;32(3):615-624. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05808-w. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
7
Preoperative measurement of the hiatal surface with MDCT: impact on surgical planning.MDCT 术前测量食管裂孔表面:对手术计划的影响。
Radiol Med. 2021 Dec;126(12):1508-1517. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01413-0. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
Hiatal hernia prevalence and natural history on non-contrast CT in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).食管裂孔疝在非对比 CT 中的患病率和自然史:多民族动脉粥样硬化研究(MESA)。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000565.
9
Anatomic Observation of Recurrent Hiatal Hernia: Recurrence or Disease Progression?解剖学观察复发性食管裂孔疝:复发还是疾病进展?
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jun;230(6):999-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
10
Hiatal Surface Area's CT scan measurement is useful in hiatal hernia's treatment of bariatric patients.裂孔表面积的CT扫描测量在肥胖症患者食管裂孔疝的治疗中很有用。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2021 Apr;30(2):86-93. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2019.1683033. Epub 2019 Oct 31.