Hashimoto Kenji, Turnbull Samual, Bickley Max, Bhaskaran Ashwin, Huang Kaimin, De Silva Kasun, Kumar Saurabh
Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Aug;36(8):1913-1923. doi: 10.1111/jce.16756. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) may present clinically with ventricular tachycardia (VT). Since the diagnosis is challenging, clinical manifestations and imaging findings are commonly used to identify probable CS in patients without histological diagnosis or extracardiac sarcoidosis. However, data on VT ablation with probable CS remains limited. We investigated the scar distribution and long-term outcomes of VT ablation in patients with at least probable CS and compared these with noninflammatory nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients.
Patients with at least probable CS and VT, who underwent catheter ablation were retrospectively included (the CS group), and compared with idiopathic NICM patients in whom focal inflammation was excluded via fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (the noninflammatory NICM group). Procedural characteristics including scar distribution data along with postprocedural clinical outcomes were assessed. Twenty-three and 40 patients were included in the CS and noninflammatory NICM groups, respectively. Left and right ventricular substrate mapping was performed in 48% and 57% of CS patients, and in 68% and 38% of noninflammatory NICM patients. Right ventricular map revealed a broader bipolar low-voltage area and a more frequent unipolar low-voltage area in the septum in the CS group, whereas left ventricle map demonstrated no significant differences. At 1-year, ventricular arrhythmia-free survival (48% vs. 85%, p = 0.01, after multiple procedures) and death/transplant-free survival were lower in the CS group (54% vs. 97%, p < 0.01).
CS patients exhibited significantly worse outcomes after VT ablation, compared to noninflammatory NICM patients, highlighting the importance of distinguishing CS from idiopathic NICM to optimize patient management.
心脏结节病(CS)临床上可能表现为室性心动过速(VT)。由于诊断具有挑战性,在没有组织学诊断或心脏外结节病的患者中,临床表现和影像学检查结果通常用于识别可能的CS。然而,关于可能患有CS的VT消融的数据仍然有限。我们研究了至少可能患有CS的患者VT消融后的瘢痕分布和长期预后,并将其与非炎性非缺血性心肌病(NICM)患者进行比较。
回顾性纳入至少可能患有CS且接受导管消融的VT患者(CS组),并与通过氟脱氧葡萄糖-正电子发射断层扫描排除局灶性炎症的特发性NICM患者(非炎性NICM组)进行比较。评估手术特征,包括瘢痕分布数据以及术后临床结果。CS组和非炎性NICM组分别纳入23例和40例患者。48%的CS患者和57%的非炎性NICM患者进行了左心室和右心室基质标测。右心室标测显示CS组中双极低电压区域更广泛,室间隔单极低电压区域更常见,而左心室标测无显著差异。1年时,CS组的无室性心律失常生存率(多次手术后为48%对85%,p = 0.01)和无死亡/移植生存率较低(54%对97%,p < 0.01)。
与非炎性NICM患者相比,CS患者VT消融后的预后明显更差,这突出了区分CS与特发性NICM以优化患者管理的重要性。