Hurst Daniel J, Rodger Daniel, Padilla Luz A, Ovalle Fernando
Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Medical Education & Scholarship, 40 E. Laurel Road UEC 2135, Stratford, NJ, 08084, USA.
School of Allied and Community Health, London South Bank University Institute of Health and Social Care, London, UK.
J Endocrinol Invest. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s40618-025-02626-0.
Over 8 million people globally have type 1 diabetes. Islet allotransplantation offers an alternative to insulin therapy but is constrained by donor availability. Genetically modified pig islet transplantation presents a potential solution, yet understanding stakeholder attitudes is crucial before clinical adoption.
This scoping review followed Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA guidelines. CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, PsychINFO, and SCOPUS were searched for studies examining attitudes toward pig islet xenotransplantation among patients, healthcare workers, and other stakeholders.
From 199 sources, 16 met eligibility criteria, spanning ten countries from 2003 to 2023. The 23,780 participants included 1,535 (6.5%) patients/family members, 216 (0.9%) healthcare workers, and 22,029 (92.6%) students. Attitudes were generally positive but declined sharply in some studies when risks, such as viral transmission, were disclosed.
Despite overall positive attitudes, risk perception significantly influences acceptance of islet xenotransplantation. The predominance of quantitative research highlights a need for qualitative studies and validated survey instruments to enhance understanding and comparability of stakeholder perspectives.
全球有超过800万人患有1型糖尿病。胰岛同种异体移植为胰岛素治疗提供了一种替代方案,但受到供体可用性的限制。转基因猪胰岛移植是一种潜在的解决方案,然而在临床应用之前,了解利益相关者的态度至关重要。
本范围综述遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的方法和PRISMA指南。检索了CINAHL、EMBASE、PubMed、PsychINFO和SCOPUS等数据库,以查找有关患者、医护人员和其他利益相关者对猪胰岛异种移植态度的研究。
从199个来源中,有16项符合纳入标准,涵盖2003年至2023年的10个国家。23780名参与者包括1535名(6.5%)患者/家庭成员、216名(0.9%)医护人员和22029名(92.6%)学生。态度总体上是积极的,但在一些研究中,当披露病毒传播等风险时,态度急剧下降。
尽管总体态度积极,但风险认知显著影响对胰岛异种移植的接受度。定量研究的主导地位凸显了进行定性研究和使用经过验证的调查工具的必要性,以加强对利益相关者观点的理解和可比性。