Su Jiahui, Gao Yurou, Sun Yumiao, Bing Mengyao, Liu Qian S, Zhou Qunfang, Fiedler Heidelore, Jiang Guibin
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; Sino-Danish College, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Environ Int. 2025 Jul;201:109593. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109593. Epub 2025 Jun 7.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are frequently detected in human breast milk. However, there is still limited understanding of the potential health risks associated with PFAS contamination in breast milk. In the present study, we calculated the plasma concentrations and estimated daily intakes (EDIs) of four PFAS, i.e. perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS) and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), based on a recently published study on PFAS concentrations in breast milk from five regions of the United Nations, and evaluated the potential health risks of PFAS. Risk assessment based on plasma PFAS concentrations indicated their potential deleterious effects on both mothers and infants, and notably infants were more vulnerable than mothers to PFAS exposure. Moreover, PFHxS and PFNA posed a higher health risk than PFOS and PFOA. Based on the calculation of toxicological data from animal studies using the method proposed by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), new minimal risk values (MRVs) proposed herein for infants were 3.35, 2.92, 0.25, and 0.38 ng/kg bw/d for PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, and PFNA, respectively. The comparison of infant MRVs and EDIs further demonstrated the health hazards of PFAS exposure in infants via breast milk. This work indicated the potential maternal and infant health risks from human burden of PFAS, and the newly developed MRVs of four PFAS for infants would be more suitable than the health-based guidance values proposed by the ATSDR, in view of accurate assessment on the health threat to neonates from the exposure of this kind of emerging chemicals via breastfeeding.
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)在人母乳中经常被检测到。然而,对于母乳中PFAS污染所带来的潜在健康风险,人们的了解仍然有限。在本研究中,我们根据最近发表的一项关于联合国五个地区母乳中PFAS浓度的研究,计算了四种PFAS(即全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)、全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟己烷磺酸(PFHxS)和全氟壬酸(PFNA))的血浆浓度并估算了每日摄入量(EDI),并评估了PFAS的潜在健康风险。基于血浆PFAS浓度的风险评估表明它们对母亲和婴儿都有潜在的有害影响,尤其是婴儿比母亲更容易受到PFAS暴露的影响。此外,PFHxS和PFNA带来的健康风险高于PFOS和PFOA。根据使用美国有毒物质和疾病登记署(ATSDR)提出的方法从动物研究中计算出的毒理学数据,本文提出的婴儿新的最小风险值(MRV)分别为:PFOS为3.35 ng/kg bw/d,PFOA为2.92 ng/kg bw/d,PFHxS为0.25 ng/kg bw/d,PFNA为0.38 ng/kg bw/d。婴儿MRV与EDI的比较进一步证明了婴儿通过母乳暴露于PFAS的健康危害。这项工作表明了人类PFAS负担对母婴健康的潜在风险,并且鉴于对新生儿通过母乳喂养接触这类新兴化学物质所造成的健康威胁进行准确评估,新制定的四种PFAS对婴儿的MRV比ATSDR提出的基于健康的指导值更合适。