• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

逆行胫骨髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折:疗效与并发症

Retrograde tibial intramedullary nailing for distal tibial fractures: outcomes and complications.

作者信息

Xu Weizhen, Lin Weibin, Chen Tianlai, Liu Hui, Zhang Jinhui, Wu Jin

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, the 909th Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Zhanghua Road 269, Zhangzhou, Fujian, 363000, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 12;20(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05995-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-025-05995-7
PMID:40506773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12160109/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Retrograde tibial nailing (RTN) is a relatively new, minimally invasive technique for managing distal tibial fractures. Studies have demonstrated that RTN provides superior biomechanical stability compared to locking plates and yields favorable clinical outcomes. However, clinical data on RTN remain limited, particularly regarding its complication profile. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of RTN in distal tibial fracture treatment, with a focus on identifying and analyzing associated complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent RTN for distal tibial fractures between August 2020 and December 2023 at a Level I trauma center. Collected variables included patient demographics, injury mechanism, fracture classification, operative time, length of hospital stays, time to radiographic union, time to full weight-bearing, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores at final follow-up, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included, with a follow-up duration ranging from 12 to 25 months (mean 17.0 ± 3.1 months). Radiographic union was achieved in 4 to 6 months (mean 4.5 ± 1.2 months). Full weight-bearing was resumed between 45 and 78 days postoperatively (mean 56.4 ± 11.2 days). Final AOFAS scores ranged from 73 to 95, with an average of 82.3 ± 9.2. Six complications were recorded: one case each of locking screw misplacement, posterior tibial tendon injury with associated ankle pain and swelling, medial ankle pain, loss of reduction, medial malleolus fracture, and superficial wound infection. No instances of implant failure, delayed union, nonunion, or deformity were observed.

CONCLUSION

RTN is an effective and reliable option for the treatment of distal tibial fractures, demonstrating favorable clinical outcomes and a low complication rate. Refinement of surgical techniques may further reduce the risk of complications.

摘要

背景

逆行胫骨髓内钉固定术(RTN)是一种相对较新的、用于治疗胫骨远端骨折的微创技术。研究表明,与锁定钢板相比,RTN具有更好的生物力学稳定性,并能产生良好的临床效果。然而,关于RTN的临床数据仍然有限,特别是其并发症情况。本研究旨在评估RTN治疗胫骨远端骨折的临床疗效,重点是识别和分析相关并发症。

方法

对2020年8月至2023年12月期间在一级创伤中心接受RTN治疗胫骨远端骨折的患者进行回顾性研究。收集的变量包括患者人口统计学资料、损伤机制、骨折分类、手术时间、住院时间、影像学愈合时间、完全负重时间、末次随访时的美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分以及术后并发症。

结果

共纳入47例患者,随访时间为12至25个月(平均17.0±3.1个月)。影像学愈合时间为4至6个月(平均4.5±1.2个月)。术后45至78天恢复完全负重(平均56.4±11.2天)。末次随访时AOFAS评分范围为73至95分,平均为82.3±9.2分。记录到6例并发症:锁定螺钉位置错误1例、胫后肌腱损伤伴踝关节疼痛和肿胀1例、内踝疼痛1例、复位丢失1例、内踝骨折1例、浅表伤口感染1例。未观察到内固定失败、延迟愈合、不愈合或畸形的情况。

结论

RTN是治疗胫骨远端骨折的一种有效且可靠的选择,具有良好的临床效果和较低的并发症发生率。手术技术的改进可能会进一步降低并发症的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/12160109/634e6504f56c/13018_2025_5995_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/12160109/610213430eb1/13018_2025_5995_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/12160109/5cc05448dc05/13018_2025_5995_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/12160109/9bfda3f20e03/13018_2025_5995_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/12160109/5cfa2e83be36/13018_2025_5995_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/12160109/634e6504f56c/13018_2025_5995_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/12160109/610213430eb1/13018_2025_5995_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/12160109/5cc05448dc05/13018_2025_5995_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/12160109/9bfda3f20e03/13018_2025_5995_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/12160109/5cfa2e83be36/13018_2025_5995_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d93e/12160109/634e6504f56c/13018_2025_5995_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Retrograde tibial intramedullary nailing for distal tibial fractures: outcomes and complications.逆行胫骨髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折:疗效与并发症
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 12;20(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05995-7.
2
Retrograde tibial intramedullary nail versus minimally invasive locking plate for extra-articular distal tibial fractures: a comparative and retrospective study.逆行胫骨髓内钉与微创锁定钢板治疗关节外胫骨远端骨折:一项对比性回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 17;19(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04979-3.
3
Comparison of retrograde and antegrade tibial intramedullary nail in the treatment of extra-articular distal tibial fractures.逆行与顺行胫骨髓内钉治疗胫骨远端关节外骨折的比较。
Int Orthop. 2025 Jan;49(1):219-227. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06348-5. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
4
The Retrograde Tibial Nail: presentation and biomechanical evaluation of a new concept in the treatment of distal tibia fractures.逆行胫骨髓内钉:治疗胫骨远端骨折新概念的介绍与生物力学评估
Injury. 2014 Jan;45 Suppl 1:S81-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.025. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
5
Nonunion of the distal one-fourth of the tibia treated by retrograde tibial intramedullary nail.胫骨逆行髓内钉治疗胫骨远端四分之一不愈合。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Oct;52(10):3000605241289017. doi: 10.1177/03000605241289017.
6
A Randomised Trial Comparing the Outcome of Expert Tibia Nailing and Plating for Distal Tibial Fractures.一项比较胫骨远端骨折专家髓内钉固定与钢板固定效果的随机试验。
Ann Afr Med. 2025 Apr 1;24(2):384-390. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_197_24. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
7
Preliminary results of stabilization of far distal tibia fractures with the distal tibial nail: A prospective, multicenter case series study.采用胫骨远端锁定钉治疗胫骨远段骨折的初步结果:一项前瞻性、多中心病例系列研究。
Injury. 2024 Aug;55(8):111634. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111634. Epub 2024 May 28.
8
[Combination of intramedullary nail and covered screw osteosynthesis for managing distal tibial fracture with ankle joint involvement].髓内钉与带锁螺钉内固定联合治疗累及踝关节的胫骨干远端骨折
Unfallchirurg. 1998 Dec;101(12):907-13. doi: 10.1007/s001130050357.
9
Retrograde tibial nailing: a minimally invasive and biomechanically superior alternative to angle-stable plate osteosynthesis in distal tibia fractures.逆行胫骨交锁髓内钉固定术:治疗胫骨远端骨折的一种微创且生物力学性能更优的方法,可替代角度稳定钢板内固定术
J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 May 13;9:35. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-9-35.
10
Distal tibial fractures fixation using retrograde tibial intramedullary nail in high-risk patients: a retrospective study.高危患者中使用逆行胫骨髓内钉固定胫骨远端骨折:一项回顾性研究
Acta Orthop Belg. 2024 Sep;90(3):559-565. doi: 10.52628/90.3.12760.

本文引用的文献

1
Retrograde tibial intramedullary nail versus minimally invasive locking plate for extra-articular distal tibial fractures: a comparative and retrospective study.逆行胫骨髓内钉与微创锁定钢板治疗关节外胫骨远端骨折:一项对比性回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 17;19(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04979-3.
2
Preliminary results of stabilization of far distal tibia fractures with the distal tibial nail: A prospective, multicenter case series study.采用胫骨远端锁定钉治疗胫骨远段骨折的初步结果:一项前瞻性、多中心病例系列研究。
Injury. 2024 Aug;55(8):111634. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111634. Epub 2024 May 28.
3
Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) and Intramedullary Nailing (IMN) for Treating Extraarticular Distal Tibial Fractures: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes.
微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)与髓内钉(IMN)治疗关节外胫骨远端骨折的比较研究:临床和影像学结果。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Oct 16;29:e942154. doi: 10.12659/MSM.942154.
4
Ideal entry point and direction of retrograde intramedullary nailing of the tibia.胫骨逆行髓内钉理想的入钉点和入钉方向。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 29;18(1):472. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03921-3.
5
Novel Retrograde Tibial Intramedullary Nailing for Distal Tibial Fractures.新型逆行胫骨髓内钉治疗胫骨远端骨折
Front Surg. 2022 May 10;9:899483. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.899483. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison of Radiological and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated with Standard Plating versus Intramedullary Nailing in Distal Tibial Fracture.对比标准钢板固定与髓内钉固定治疗胫骨远端骨折的影像学和临床疗效。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Mar;14(3):536-542. doi: 10.1111/os.13210. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
7
Retrograde tibial nailing of far distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical evaluation of double- versus triple-distal interlocking.逆行胫骨远端髓内钉固定术治疗胫骨远段骨折:双远端与三远端交锁的生物力学评估。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3693-3700. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01843-5. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
8
Clinical and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Distal Tibial Fracture Treated by Circular External Fixation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.环形外固定治疗胫骨干骺端骨折患者的临床及功能结局:一项回顾性队列研究
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2021 May-Aug;16(2):86-95. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1516.
9
Intramedullary Nailing Versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Distal Tibial Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.交锁髓内钉与微创钢板接骨术治疗胫骨远端骨折的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(6):954-965. doi: 10.1111/os.12575.
10
Nail or plate in the management of distal extra-articular tibial fracture, what is better? Valutation of outcomes.用于治疗胫骨远端关节外骨折时,髓内钉与钢板哪种更好?疗效评估。
SICOT J. 2018;4:2. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2017058. Epub 2018 Feb 21.