Ding Qianjiang, Deng Xi, Huang Jingfeng, Zhang Ruixue, Liu Ting, Wang Jianhua, Wang Yutao
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315010, China.
Department of Pathology, Ningbo Clinical Pathology Diagnosis Center, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315021, China.
Curr Med Imaging. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.2174/0115734056361565250530050624.
VETC-positive has emerged as a novel predictor of HCC for poor prognosis. Enhanced CT is one of the most common diagnostic methods, which can indicate VETC positivity, providing important evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of VETC-positive HCC.
The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical and preoperative enhanced CT imaging characteristics and diagnostic value of VETCpositive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical, pathological, and imaging data of 53 HCC patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University between June 2019 and September 2022. According to pathological results, patients were categorized into 11 VETC-positive and 42 VETC-negative cases. Observational parameters included: (1) Clinical indicators: gender, age, history of hepatitis B virus infection, preoperative AFP, TNM staging, and preoperative biochemical and coagulation laboratory tests, including Alb, AST, ALT, TBil, DB, PT, TT, and INR. Additionally, pathological results such as histological grading, microvascular invasion (MVI), satellite nodules, neural invasion, and postoperative recurrence were analyzed. (2) Preoperative enhanced CT observational indicators: maximum tumor diameter, intrahepatic growth, irregular tumor margins, peritumoral hepatic parenchymal enhancement, mosaic structure, non-ring-like arterial phase hyperenhancement, marked heterogeneous enhancement, non-peripheral washout, absence of enhancing capsule, enhancing/clear capsule, intratumoral arteries, intratumoral necrosis, along with measurement of unenhanced CT values and enhanced CT values at various phases, calculating enhancement ratios (enhancement ratio = enhanced CT value - unenhanced CT value / unenhanced CT value). Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (x̅±s), with intergroup comparisons conducted using the t-test; categorical variables were compared using the χ test or Fisher's exact test. Multivariate analysis employed stepwise regression for logistic regression, incorporating clinical and imaging characteristics into the logistic regression equation. Based on logistic regression results, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, calculating the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analysis on survival was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests, aiming survival curves.
(1) Clinical characteristics of VETC-positive versus VETC-negative patients: Preoperative AFP levels showed statistical significance (P=0.037), while no significant differences were observed in gender, age, Alb, TB, DB, AST, ALT, PT, TT, and INR between VETC-positive and VETCnegative patients (P>0.05). (2) Enhanced CT imaging features of VETC-positive versus VETC-negative patients: Intratumoral necrosis showed statistical significance (P<0.05), with intratumoral arteries being 63.6% (7/11) in the positive group compared to 42.9% (18/42) in the negative group. No significant differences were found in maximum tumor diameter, irregular tumor margins, peritumoral hepatic parenchymal enhancement, mosaic structure, non-ring-like arterial phase hyperenhancement, marked heterogeneous enhancement, non-peripheral washout, absence of enhancing capsule, enhancing capsule, intratumoral arteries, as well as unenhanced CT values and enhanced CT values at various phases, arterial phase enhancement ratio, portal phase enhancement ratio, and delayed phase enhancement ratio (P>0.05). (3) Multivariate analysis influencing VETC positivity: Arterial phase CT values (HU) (OR=0.937, P=0.029), intratumoral arteries (OR=9.452, P=0.021), and intratumoral necrosis (OR=0.013, P=0.003) were identified as independent risk factors for VETC positivity (Odds Ratio=0.937, 9.452, 0.013, 95% CI=0.883-0.993, 1.4-63.823, 0.001-0.223, P<0.05). The AUC of VETC was 0.863 (95% CI: 0.728-0.997), with a sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 88.1%. (4) Postoperative early tumor recurrence in VETC-positive and VETC-negative patients: All 53 patients were followed up, with an average tumor recurrence time of 11 (4-20) months, showing significant differences (P<0.05).
As one of the routine and preferred methods for HCC examination, enhanced CT plays a pivotal role in diagnosis, staging, and post-treatment evaluation. Combining preoperative enhanced arterial phase CT values, intratumoral arteries, and intratumoral necrosis can highly indicate VETC positivity.
VETC阳性已成为肝细胞癌预后不良的一种新的预测指标。增强CT是最常用的诊断方法之一,可显示VETC阳性,为VETC阳性肝细胞癌的诊断和治疗提供重要依据。
本研究旨在探讨VETC阳性肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的临床及术前增强CT影像特征和诊断价值。
回顾性分析2019年6月至2022年9月宁波大学第一附属医院53例HCC患者的临床、病理及影像资料。根据病理结果,将患者分为VETC阳性组11例和VETC阴性组42例。观察指标包括:(1)临床指标:性别、年龄、乙肝病毒感染史、术前甲胎蛋白(AFP)、TNM分期以及术前生化和凝血实验室检查,包括白蛋白(Alb)、谷草转氨酶(AST)、谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、总胆红素(TBil)、直接胆红素(DB)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、凝血酶时间(TT)和国际标准化比值(INR)。此外,分析组织学分级、微血管侵犯(MVI)、卫星结节、神经侵犯及术后复发等病理结果。(2)术前增强CT观察指标:肿瘤最大直径、肝内生长情况、肿瘤边缘不规则程度、瘤周肝实质强化、马赛克结构、非环状动脉期高增强、显著不均匀强化、非周边廓清、无强化包膜、强化/清晰包膜、瘤内动脉、瘤内坏死,同时测量平扫CT值及各期增强CT值,计算强化率(强化率 =(增强CT值 - 平扫CT值)/平扫CT值)。定量资料以均数±标准差(x̅±s)表示,组间比较采用t检验;分类变量采用χ检验或Fisher确切概率法比较。多因素分析采用逐步回归进行Logistic回归,将临床和影像特征纳入Logistic回归方程。根据Logistic回归结果绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感度、特异度及其95%置信区间(CI)。采用Kaplan-Meier法和对数秩检验进行生存分析,绘制生存曲线。
(1)VETC阳性与VETC阴性患者的临床特征:术前AFP水平差异有统计学意义(P = 0.037),而VETC阳性与VETC阴性患者在性别、年龄、Alb、TB、DB、AST、ALT、PT、TT和INR方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)VETC阳性与VETC阴性患者的增强CT影像特征:瘤内坏死差异有统计学意义(P<均数±标准差(x̅±s)表示,组间比较采用t检验;分类变量采用χ检验或Fisher确切概率法比较。多因素分析采用逐步回归进行Logistic回归,将临床和影像特征纳入Logistic回归方程。根据Logistic回归结果绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感度、特异度及其95%置信区间(CI)。采用Kaplan-Meier法和对数秩检验进行生存分析,绘制生存曲线。
(1)VETC阳性与VETC阴性患者的临床特征:术前AFP水平差异有统计学意义(P = 0.037),而VETC阳性与VETC阴性患者在性别年龄、Alb、TB、DB、AST、ALT、PT、TT和INR方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)VETC阳性与VETC阴性患者的增强CT影像特征:瘤内坏死差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),阳性组瘤内动脉为63.6%(7/11),阴性组为42.9%(18/42)。在肿瘤最大直径、肿瘤边缘不规则程度、瘤周肝实质强化、马赛克结构、非环状动脉期高增强、显著不均匀强化、非周边廓清、无强化包膜、强化包膜、瘤内动脉以及平扫CT值及各期增强CT值、动脉期强化率、门脉期强化率和延迟期强化率方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)影响VETC阳性的多因素分析:动脉期CT值(HU)(OR = 0.937,P = 0.029)、瘤内动脉(OR = 9.452,P = 0.021)和瘤内坏死(OR = 0.013,P = 0.003)被确定为VETC阳性的独立危险因素(比值比 = 0.937、9.452、0.013,95%CI = 0.883 - 项无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)影响VETC阳性的多因素分析:动脉期CT值(HU)(OR = 0.937,P = 0.029)、瘤内动脉(OR = 9.452,P = 0.021)和瘤内坏死(OR = 0.013,P = 0.003)被确定为VETC阳性的独立危险因素(比值比 = 0.937、9.452、0.013,95%CI = 0.883 - 0.993、1.4 - 63.823、0.001 - 0.223,P<0.05)。VETC的AUC为0.863(95%CI:0.728 - 0.997),敏感度为81.8%,特异度为88.1%。(4)VETC阳性与VETC阴性患者术后早期肿瘤复发情况:53例患者均获随访,平均肿瘤复发时间为11(4 - 20)个月,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
增强CT作为HCC检查的常规及首选方法之一,在诊断、分期及治疗后评估中起关键作用。结合术前增强动脉期CT值、瘤内动脉和瘤内坏死可高度提示VETC阳性。