Suppr超能文献

与在股骨处使用扩髓-冲洗-吸引2系统相比,使用髋臼扩孔钻在髂骨处采集自体骨移植物,采集量相当,但失血量更少,成本更低。

Autogenous bone graft collection by acetabular reamers at the ilium yielded comparable volume with less blood loss and lower costs compared to the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator 2 system at the femur.

作者信息

Duong Andrew, Patel Vishal, Shabani Soroush, Satish Vivek, Allen Michael, Ross Ryan, Mulakaluri Ashley, Patterson Joseph

机构信息

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States.

University of California San Francisco, Fresno, United States.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 13;35(1):243. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04347-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare autogenous bone graft volume, blood loss, transfusion rate, complications, and costs by collection using acetabular reamers at the ilium (ARI) to Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA2) at the femur.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults who underwent long bone or sacral nonunion repair with autogenous bone graft collection by either unilateral ARI or RIA2 from femur from November 2020 to May 2023 at two academic trauma referral centers were retrospectively identified. Outcomes included graft volume, estimated blood less (EBL), perioperative change in hematocrit (ΔHct) and hemoglobin (ΔHgb), red blood cells (pRBC) units transfused intra- or postoperatively, infection, iatrogenic fracture, pathologic fracture, venous thromboembolism, and equipment costs per procedure.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were included, of whom 18 received ARI was and 11 received RIA2. No differences were observed between groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, substance use, or medical comorbidities. Mean graft volumes were similar: ARI 38.3 cc (range 20-80 cc) versus RIA2 36.4 cc (range 10-60 cc), p = 0.74). ARI was associated with lower mean EBL (408.7 ± 210.0 cc vs. 750.0 ± 508.0 cc, p = 0.02), mean ΔHgb (2.1 ± 1.4 g/dL vs. 4.0 ± 1.7 g/dL, p = 0.007) and mean ΔHct (6.9 ± 4.9% vs. 11.9 ± 5.7%, p = 0.03). No differences in the incidence of pRBC transfusions (0.28 ± 0.67 vs. 0.64 ± 1.03 units, p = 0.32) or complications at the harvest site (5.6% vs. 0%, p = 1.00) were observed. ARI durable components acquisition ($11,500 vs. $12,500) and per case sterilization and disposable ($18 vs. $3,500) costs were lower.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral autogenous bone graft collection from ilium with acetabular reamers yielded similar graft volume with less blood loss at lower cost than RIA2 collection from femur.

摘要

目的

比较使用髋臼锉在髂骨采集自体骨移植的体积、失血量、输血率、并发症和成本与使用股骨扩髓-冲洗-吸引器(RIA2)采集的情况。

材料与方法

回顾性纳入2020年11月至2023年5月在两个学术性创伤转诊中心接受长骨或骶骨骨不连修复并通过单侧髋臼锉在髂骨或RIA2在股骨采集自体骨移植的成年人。结果包括移植体积、估计失血量(EBL)、围手术期血细胞比容(ΔHct)和血红蛋白(ΔHgb)变化、术中或术后输注的红细胞(pRBC)单位数、感染、医源性骨折、病理性骨折、静脉血栓栓塞以及每个手术的设备成本。

结果

纳入29例患者,其中18例接受髋臼锉在髂骨采集,11例接受RIA2在股骨采集。两组在年龄、性别、体重指数、物质使用或合并症方面未观察到差异。平均移植体积相似:髋臼锉在髂骨采集为38.3 cc(范围20 - 80 cc),而RIA2在股骨采集为36.4 cc(范围10 - 60 cc),p = 0.74)。髋臼锉在髂骨采集与较低的平均EBL(408.7±210.0 cc对750.0±508.0 cc,p = 0.02)、平均ΔHgb(2.1±1.4 g/dL对4.0±1.7 g/dL,p = 0.007)和平均ΔHct(6.9±4.9%对11.9±5.7%,p = 0.03)相关。在pRBC输血发生率(0.28±0.67对0.64±1.03单位,p = 0.32)或采集部位并发症发生率(5.6%对0%,p = 1.00)方面未观察到差异。髋臼锉在髂骨采集的耐用部件购置成本(11,500美元对12,500美元)和每例消毒及一次性成本(18美元对3,500美元)较低。

结论

与使用RIA2在股骨采集相比,使用髋臼锉在髂骨单侧采集自体骨移植产生相似的移植体积,失血量更少,成本更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7489/12166000/107b10a683cb/590_2025_4347_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验