Eliason Erica L, Nelson Daniel B, Wood Jordan, Strane Doug, Vasan Aditi
Center for State Health Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Department of Urban-Global Public Health, Rutgers School of Public Health, Newark, New Jersey.
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jun 7;6(6):e251376. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1376.
National continuous Medicaid eligibility under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) may have differentially affected children's health care depending on whether states had preexisting 12-month continuous Medicaid eligibility for children.
To estimate the association of states newly implementing continuous Medicaid eligibility under the FFCRA with children's health care access, health care use, and barriers to care.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This survey study used a difference-in-differences research design comparing states before (2017-2019) and during (2020-2022) the FFCRA overall, by caregiver-reported race and ethnicity, and among publicly insured children. Analyses used data from the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH), an annual household survey on the health and well-being of children 0 to 17 years old in the US. Data were analyzed from September 2024 to March 2025.
Whether states had pre-FFCRA 12-month continuous Medicaid eligibility for children.
Insurance coverage, gaps in coverage, unmet health care needs, any health care visits, preventive visits, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, any time spent weekly arranging children's health care, and problems paying medical bills.
The sample included 215 884 children, with children in states with pre-FFCRA continuous eligibility being similar to children in states newly implementing continuous eligibility with respect to age (8.6 years old in both sets of states), gender (49.6% female compared to 48.5%), and nativity (66.7% third generation or longer with all parents born in the US vs 69.6%), with lower proportions who were non-Hispanic Black (11.9% compared to 13.8%) or non-Hispanic White (50.5% compared to 52.9%), and higher proportions who were Hispanic (25.5% compared to 23.9%). In adjusted difference-in-difference models, newly implementing continuous eligibility under the FFCRA was associated with a 0.7-percentage point (95% CI, -1.2 to -0.1 percentage point) reduction in children's unmet health care needs. There was no evidence of additional FFCRA-associated changes in outcomes overall. In subgroup analyses, there were reductions in coverage gaps, unmet health care needs, and time spent arranging care among Hispanic children and publicly insured children.
In this survey study, newly implementing continuous eligibility for children under the FFCRA was associated with reductions in unmet health care needs and no additional changes in health care outcomes overall, with additional benefits for Hispanic children and publicly insured children. This could reflect expected changes under mandatory, national 12-month continuous eligibility for children implemented in January 2024.
根据《家庭第一冠状病毒应对法案》(FFCRA),全国范围内连续的医疗补助资格可能会因各州之前是否为儿童提供12个月连续的医疗补助资格而对儿童医疗保健产生不同影响。
评估根据FFCRA新实施连续医疗补助资格的州与儿童医疗保健可及性、医疗保健使用情况及医疗保健障碍之间的关联。
设计、背景和参与者:这项调查研究采用了差异中的差异研究设计,总体上比较了FFCRA实施前(2017 - 2019年)和实施期间(2020 - 2022年)的各州情况,按照料者报告的种族和民族以及在公共保险儿童中进行比较。分析使用了美国国家儿童健康调查(NSCH)的数据,这是一项关于美国0至17岁儿童健康和福祉的年度家庭调查。数据于2024年9月至2025年3月进行分析。
各州在FFCRA实施前是否为儿童提供12个月连续的医疗补助资格。
保险覆盖范围、覆盖缺口、未满足的医疗保健需求、任何医疗就诊、预防性就诊、急诊科就诊、住院情况、每周花费在安排儿童医疗保健上的任何时间以及支付医疗账单的问题。
样本包括215884名儿童,在FFCRA实施前具有连续资格的州的儿童与新实施连续资格的州的儿童在年龄(两组州均为8.6岁)、性别(49.6%为女性,相比之下为48.5%)和出生地(66.7%为第三代或更长代际且父母均在美国出生,相比之下为69.6%)方面相似,非西班牙裔黑人比例较低(11.9%,相比之下为13.8%)或非西班牙裔白人比例较低(50.5%,相比之下为52.9%),西班牙裔比例较高(25.5%,相比之下为23.9%)。在调整后的差异中的差异模型中,根据FFCRA新实施连续资格与儿童未满足的医疗保健需求降低0.7个百分点(95%置信区间,-1.2至-0.1个百分点)相关。总体上没有证据表明FFCRA相关的其他结局变化。在亚组分析中,西班牙裔儿童和公共保险儿童的覆盖缺口、未满足的医疗保健需求以及安排医疗保健所花费的时间有所减少。
在这项调查研究中,根据FFCRA新实施的儿童连续资格与未满足的医疗保健需求减少相关,且总体上医疗保健结局没有其他变化,对西班牙裔儿童和公共保险儿童有额外益处。这可能反映了2024年1月实施的强制性全国儿童12个月连续资格下的预期变化。