• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿地瑞单抗联合化疗一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of adebrelimab in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

作者信息

Zheng Zhiwei, Zhu Huide, Fang Ling

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 13;20(6):e0325171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325171. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325171
PMID:40512778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12165369/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of adebrelimab in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) from the Chinese medical perspective.

METHODS

We have designed a partitioned survival model. The model integrates clinical information pertaining to overall survival, progression-free survival, adverse events and cost data. Our primary measure of outcome in this model is quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The model adopted a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $40,343.68 per QALY. To account for uncertainty in the model parameters, we conducted sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The total expenditure for the adebrelimab group was $79,549.34, compared to $6,436.80 for the chemotherapy group. The adebrelimab cohort achieved an incremental gain of 1.25 QALY, resulting in an additional cost of $73,112.54. Consequently, the ICER for the adebrelimab group was determined to be $58,490.03 per QALY, surpassing the WTP threshold of $40,343.68 in China. The sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the findings across various scenarios.

CONCLUSION

This cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that adebrelimab plus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for ES-SCLC was not cost-effective in China with a WTP of $40,343.68.Reducing the cost of adebrelimab promises to improve the cost-effectiveness of this treatment regimen.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在从中国医学角度评估阿得贝利单抗联合化疗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)一线治疗方案的成本效益。

方法

我们设计了一个分段生存模型。该模型整合了与总生存期、无进展生存期、不良事件及成本数据相关的临床信息。本模型的主要结局指标是质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益比(ICER)。该模型采用的支付意愿(WTP)阈值为每QALY 40343.68美元。为考虑模型参数的不确定性,我们进行了敏感性分析。

结果

阿得贝利单抗组的总支出为79549.34美元,而化疗组为6436.80美元。阿得贝利单抗队列实现了1.25 QALY的增量收益,导致额外成本73112.54美元。因此,阿得贝利单抗组的ICER确定为每QALY 58490.03美元,超过了中国40343.68美元的WTP阈值。敏感性分析表明,在各种情况下研究结果都具有稳健性。

结论

这项成本效益分析表明,在中国支付意愿为40343.68美元的情况下,阿得贝利单抗联合化疗作为ES-SCLC的一线治疗方案不具有成本效益。降低阿得贝利单抗的成本有望提高该治疗方案的成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be7/12165369/04a4d1802172/pone.0325171.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be7/12165369/473f67408a92/pone.0325171.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be7/12165369/66ace4f7dc92/pone.0325171.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be7/12165369/04a4d1802172/pone.0325171.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be7/12165369/473f67408a92/pone.0325171.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be7/12165369/66ace4f7dc92/pone.0325171.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be7/12165369/04a4d1802172/pone.0325171.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of adebrelimab in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.阿地瑞单抗联合化疗一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 13;20(6):e0325171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325171. eCollection 2025.
2
Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.替雷利珠单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0320189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320189. eCollection 2025.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of Toripalimab regimen for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in China and America.托瑞帕利单抗方案治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌在中国和美国的成本效益分析。
Front Immunol. 2025 May 16;16:1556100. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1556100. eCollection 2025.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: perspectives from the United States and China.替雷利珠单抗联合化疗对比标准一线化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析:来自美国和中国的观点。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Dec;46(6):1536-1545. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01802-1. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
5
First-line chemotherapy with tislelizumab for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.替雷利珠单抗用于广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的一线化疗:一项成本效益分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31958. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83509-x.
6
Cost-effectiveness of benmelstobart and anlotinib plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China.在中国,苯达莫司汀和安罗替尼联合化疗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌一线治疗方案的成本效益分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 24;15(1):10147. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91540-9.
7
First-line treatments for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy: a China-based cost-effectiveness analysis.免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的一线治疗:基于中国的成本效益分析。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 5;15:1408928. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1408928. eCollection 2024.
8
Updated cost-effectiveness analysis of adebrelimab plus chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China.中国广泛期小细胞肺癌阿得贝利单抗联合化疗的更新成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 5;14(4):e077090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077090.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 15;16(11):e0258605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258605. eCollection 2021.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab plus etoposide: platinum in the first-line therapy of extensive stage small-cell lung cancer from the Chinese payers' perspective.度伐利尤单抗联合依托泊苷对比依托泊苷联合顺铂/卡铂用于广泛期小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效果分析:中国支付者视角。
Tumori. 2022 Feb;108(1):33-39. doi: 10.1177/0300891620985309. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis.替雷利珠单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 25;20(3):e0320189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320189. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: perspectives from the United States and China.替雷利珠单抗联合化疗对比标准一线化疗治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析:来自美国和中国的观点。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Dec;46(6):1536-1545. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01802-1. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
3
Adebrelimab plus chemotherapy and sequential thoracic radiotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): a phase II trial.
阿地布雷单抗联合化疗及序贯胸部放疗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的一线治疗:一项II期试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Aug 21;75:102795. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102795. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Consumer Out-Of-Pocket Drug Prices Grew Faster Than Prices Faced By Insurers After Accounting For Rebates, 2007-20.消费者自付药品价格在考虑回扣后比保险公司面临的价格增长更快,2007-20 年。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Sep;43(9):1284-1289. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01344.
5
Small cell lung cancer profiling: an updated synthesis of subtypes, vulnerabilities, and plasticity.小细胞肺癌分析:亚型、易损性和可塑性的最新综合研究
Trends Cancer. 2024 Oct;10(10):935-946. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2024.07.008. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
6
High-cost treatments for advanced lung cancer in Japan (Lung Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group).日本晚期肺癌的高费用治疗(日本临床肿瘤学会肺癌研究组)。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct 3;54(10):1084-1092. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyae094.
7
Use of Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds in Healthcare Public Policy: Progress and Challenges.医疗保健公共政策中使用成本效益阈值:进展与挑战。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Nov;22(6):797-804. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00900-5. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
8
Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy versus placebo combined with chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗对比安慰剂联合化疗用于中国 HER2 阴性晚期胃癌:一项成本效果分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Oct;24(8):1017-1025. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2378986. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of durvalumab, tremelimumab, and etoposide-platinum in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.度伐利尤单抗、替西木单抗和依托泊苷-铂类药物一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 19;103(16):e37836. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037836.
10
Updated cost-effectiveness analysis of adebrelimab plus chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer in China.中国广泛期小细胞肺癌阿得贝利单抗联合化疗的更新成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 5;14(4):e077090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077090.