Curtis David J, Patil Sushrut S, Reynolds John, Purtill Duncan, Lewis Clinton, Ritchie David S, Gottlieb David J, Yeung David T, Wong Eric, Tey Siok-Keen, Perera Travis, Moore John, Koldej Rachel M, De Abreu Lourenco Richard, Stubbs John, Morrissey C Orla, Munsef Nadia, Arenas Andrea, Hill Geoffrey R
Clinical Haematology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
N Engl J Med. 2025 Jul 17;393(3):243-254. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2503189. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
Allogeneic peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation (SCT) from a matched related donor after myeloablative conditioning is the preferred curative treatment for patients with high-risk blood cancers. The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor and an antimetabolite remains standard care for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in these patients. Data from two randomized trials have suggested that post-transplantation cyclophosphamide can reduce the risk of GVHD after SCT from a matched donor when it is added to or replaces the antimetabolite. However, the effects of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide specifically after SCT from a matched related donor remain uncertain, and effects in the context of myeloablative conditioning are unclear.
We randomly assigned adults who were undergoing SCT from a matched related donor after myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning to receive either post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-cyclosporin (experimental prophylaxis) or cyclosporin-methotrexate (standard prophylaxis). The primary end point was GVHD-free, relapse-free survival.
Among 134 patients who underwent randomization, 66 were assigned to receive experimental prophylaxis and 68 to receive standard prophylaxis. GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was significantly longer with experimental prophylaxis (median, 26.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1 to not reached) than with standard prophylaxis (median, 6.4 months; 95% CI, 5.6 to 8.3; P<0.001 by a log-rank test). GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at 3 years was 49% (95% CI, 36 to 61) with experimental prophylaxis and 14% (95% CI, 6 to 25) with standard prophylaxis (hazard ratio for GVHD, relapse, or death, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66). The cumulative incidence of grade III to IV acute GVHD at 3 months was 3% (95% CI, 1 to 10) in the experimental-prophylaxis group and 10% (95% CI, 4 to 19) in the standard-prophylaxis group. At 2 years, overall survival was 83% and 71%, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.19). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups in the first 100 days after SCT.
The combination of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and a calcineurin inhibitor led to longer GVHD-free, relapse-free survival than standard prophylaxis after transplantation from a matched related donor with either reduced-intensity or myeloablative conditioning in patients with blood cancers. (Funded by the Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund and others; ALLG BM12 CAST Australian-New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12618000505202.).
对于高危血癌患者,在进行清髓性预处理后接受来自匹配相关供者的异基因外周血干细胞移植(SCT)是首选的治愈性治疗方法。钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂和抗代谢物联合使用仍是这些患者预防移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的标准治疗方案。两项随机试验的数据表明,移植后环磷酰胺在添加到抗代谢物中或替代抗代谢物时,可降低来自匹配供者的SCT后GVHD的风险。然而,移植后环磷酰胺在来自匹配相关供者的SCT后的具体效果仍不确定,且在清髓性预处理背景下的效果尚不清楚。
我们将接受清髓性或降低强度预处理后接受来自匹配相关供者SCT的成年人随机分配,分别接受移植后环磷酰胺 - 环孢素(实验性预防)或环孢素 - 甲氨蝶呤(标准预防)。主要终点是无GVHD、无复发生存。
在134例接受随机分组的患者中,66例被分配接受实验性预防,68例接受标准预防。实验性预防组的无GVHD、无复发生存期(中位数为26.2个月;95%置信区间[CI],9.1至未达到)显著长于标准预防组(中位数为6.4个月;95%CI,5.6至8.3;对数秩检验P<0.001)。实验性预防组3年时的无GVHD、无复发生存率为49%(95%CI,36至61),标准预防组为14%(95%CI,6至25)(GVHD、复发或死亡的风险比为0.42;95%CI,0.27至0.66)。实验性预防组3个月时III至IV级急性GVHD的累积发生率为3%(95%CI,1至10),标准预防组为10%(95%CI,4至19)。2年时,总生存率分别为83%和71%(死亡风险比为0.59;95%CI,0.29至1.19)。在SCT后的前100天内,两组严重不良事件的发生率相似。
对于血癌患者,在接受来自匹配相关供者的降低强度或清髓性预处理后的移植后,移植后环磷酰胺与钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂联合使用导致的无GVHD、无复发生存期比标准预防更长。(由澳大利亚政府医学研究未来基金等资助;ALLG BM12 CAST澳大利亚 - 新西兰临床试验注册号,ACTRN12618000505202。)