Agarwal Tarun, Onesto Valentina, Banerjee Dishary, Guo Shengbo, Polini Alessandro, Vogt Caleb, Viswanath Abhishek, Esworthy Timothy, Cui Haitao, O'Donnell Aaron, Vajanthri Kiran Yellappa, Moroni Lorenzo, Ozbolat Ibrahim T, Panoskaltsis-Mortari Angela, Zhang Lijie Grace, Costantini Marco, Maiti Tapas Kumar
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, United States of America.
Center for Advanced Biomaterials for Health Care, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT@CRIB), Naples 80125, Italy.
Biofabrication. 2025 Aug 7;17(4). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ade47a.
Over the past decade, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has made significant progress, transforming into a key innovation in tissue engineering. Despite the early strides, critical challenges remain in 3D bioprinting that must be addressed to accelerate clinical translation. In particular, there is still a long way to go before functionally-mature, clinically-relevant tissue equivalents are developed. Current limitations range from the sub-optimal bioink properties and degree of biomimicry of bioprintable architectures, to the lack of stem/progenitor cells for massive cell expansion, and fundamental knowledge regardingculturing conditions. In addition to these problems, the absence of guidelines and well-regulated international standards is creating uncertainty among the biofabrication community stakeholders regarding the reliable and scalable production processes. This review aims at exploring the latest developments in 3D bioprinting approaches, including various additive manufacturing techniques and their applications. A thorough discussion of common bioprinting techniques and recent progresses are compiled along with notable recent studies. Later we discuss the current challenges in clinical application of 3D bioprinting and the major bottlenecks in the commercialization of 3D bioprinted tissue equivalents, including the longevity of bioprinted organs, meeting biomechanical requirements, and the often underrated ethical and legal aspects. Amidst the progress of regulatory efforts for regenerative medicine, we also present an overview of the current regulatory concerns which should be taken into account to translate bioprinted tissues into clinical practice. At last, this review emphasizes future directions in 3D bioprinting that includes the transformative ideas such as bioprinting in microgravity and the integration of artificial intelligence. The study concludes with a discussion on the need for collaborative efforts in resolving the technical and regulatory constraints to improve the quality, reliability, and reproducibility of bioprinted tissue equivalents to ultimately accomplish their successful clinical implementation.
在过去十年中,三维(3D)生物打印取得了重大进展,已成为组织工程中的一项关键创新技术。尽管已取得初步进展,但3D生物打印仍面临一些关键挑战,必须加以解决才能加速其临床转化。特别是,在开发功能成熟、与临床相关的组织等效物方面仍有很长的路要走。当前的局限性包括生物墨水特性欠佳、可生物打印结构的仿生程度不够、缺乏用于大规模细胞扩增的干/祖细胞,以及关于培养条件的基础知识不足。除了这些问题,缺乏指导方针和规范的国际标准也让生物制造领域的利益相关者对可靠且可扩展的生产过程感到不确定。本综述旨在探讨3D生物打印方法的最新进展,包括各种增材制造技术及其应用。文中全面讨论了常见的生物打印技术和近期进展,并列举了一些值得关注的近期研究。随后,我们讨论了3D生物打印临床应用中的当前挑战以及3D生物打印组织等效物商业化的主要瓶颈,包括生物打印器官的寿命、满足生物力学要求,以及常常被低估的伦理和法律问题。在再生医学监管工作取得进展的背景下,我们还概述了当前的监管关注点,这些关注点在将生物打印组织转化为临床实践时应予以考虑。最后,本综述强调了3D生物打印的未来发展方向,包括在微重力环境下进行生物打印和整合人工智能等变革性理念。该研究最后讨论了需要共同努力解决技术和监管限制,以提高生物打印组织等效物的质量、可靠性和可重复性,最终实现其成功的临床应用。