Suppr超能文献

非骨水泥型与骨水泥型全膝关节置换术中早期透亮线的对比分析。

Comparative analysis of early radiolucencies in cementless versus cemented total knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Benkovich Vadim, Abialevich Artsiom, Osinsky Vladislav, Benkovich Guy

机构信息

Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Soroka Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Bone Jt Open. 2025 Jun 14;6(6):707-714. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2024-0281.R1.

Abstract

AIMS

This study aimed to compare early outcomes of cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

We analyzed 593 patients who underwent cemented or cementless TKA between January 2017 and December 2022. Data collected included demographics, BMI, comorbidities, surgical variables, follow-up duration, and outcomes such as implant survivorship, radiolucencies (assessed using the Modern Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System (MKSRES)), short-term complications, revision rates, periprosthetic fractures, hospital length of stay, and readmissions.

RESULTS

The study included 593 patients, equally divided into cemented and cementless groups. Age (p = 0.354) and sex (p = 0.342) were similar, though BMI was higher in the cementless group (p < 0.001). Comorbidities were comparable. Radiolucencies and osteolysis occurred in 12 cemented and ten cementless cases, with no significant differences across femoral and tibial zones (p ≥ 0.479). All radiolucencies were stable, partial, and non-progressive. No cases of aseptic loosening required revision. Revisions for periprosthetic fractures were rare (p = 0.218). Hospital length of stay (p = 0.623) and readmissions (p = 0.216) were similar between groups. The mean follow-up time postoperatively was slightly longer in the cementless group (4.22 years (SD 0.84)) compared to the cemented group (4.01 years (SD 1.03)) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Cemented fixation remains the gold standard in TKA due to its reliability, yet advancements in implant design and indications support increasing adoption of cementless TKA. This study found comparable early outcomes for both methods, with stable radiolucent lines and no aseptic loosening during follow-up. The MKSRES facilitates standard radiological assessment, enabling precise implant monitoring and improving TKA outcome evaluation. These findings support the equivalence of cemented and cementless fixation in early survivorship.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较骨水泥型和非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术(TKA)的早期疗效。

方法

我们分析了2017年1月至2022年12月期间接受骨水泥型或非骨水泥型TKA的593例患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学资料、体重指数(BMI)、合并症、手术变量、随访时间以及诸如植入物存活率、透亮线(使用现代膝关节协会放射学评估系统(MKSRES)评估)、短期并发症、翻修率、假体周围骨折、住院时间和再入院等结果。

结果

该研究纳入593例患者,平均分为骨水泥型组和非骨水泥型组。年龄(p = 0.354)和性别(p = 0.342)相似,不过非骨水泥型组的BMI更高(p < 0.001)。合并症相当。骨水泥型组有12例出现透亮线和骨溶解,非骨水泥型组有10例,股骨和胫骨区域之间无显著差异(p ≥ 0.479)。所有透亮线均稳定、局部且无进展。无无菌性松动病例需要翻修。假体周围骨折的翻修很少见(p = 0.218)。两组之间的住院时间(p = 0.623)和再入院率(p = 0.216)相似。非骨水泥型组术后平均随访时间(4.22年(标准差0.84))略长于骨水泥型组(4.01年(标准差1.03))(p < 0.001)。

结论

由于其可靠性,骨水泥固定仍然是TKA的金标准,但植入物设计和适应证的进展支持非骨水泥型TKA的应用日益增加。本研究发现两种方法的早期疗效相当,随访期间透亮线稳定且无无菌性松动。MKSRES有助于进行标准的放射学评估,能够精确监测植入物并改善TKA疗效评估。这些发现支持骨水泥固定和非骨水泥固定在早期存活率方面的等效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9a5/12165740/6a8f6832242c/BJO-2024-0281.R1-galleyfig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验