Suppr超能文献

一项评估用于多间室膝关节骨关节炎的悬浮三室卸载膝关节支具的可行性随机试验。

A feasibility randomised trial evaluating the levitation tri-compartment offloader knee brace for multicompartment knee osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Bishop Emily L, Bonhomme Justin, Joffe Molly, Cowper-Smith Chris, Ronsky Janet L, Clark Marcia L

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jun 13;11(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01660-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Levitation™ "Tri-Compartment Offloader" (TCO) knee brace (Spring Loaded Technology) is designed to reduce pain for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The TCO is available on the market, however, has not been compared to the current standard of care treatment for knee OA with a controlled clinical trial. This feasibility study aimed to (i) evaluate the feasibility of conducting a full RCT, (ii) evaluate the distributional properties of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) activity-specific knee pain score to estimate the sample size required for a full randomised controlled trial (RCT), and (iii) refine and optimise the study protocol.

METHODS

A prospective, 3-group, parallel, single-centre feasibility RCT of individuals with moderate to severe patellofemoral or multicompartment knee OA was undertaken at the University of Calgary (Alberta, Canada). Participants were randomised using a 1:1:1 random allocation to one of three intervention groups: standard of care (Control), Control plus a knee sleeve (Sleeve), or Control plus a TCO brace (TCO). Participants were assessed at baseline (before intervention) and after 6 weeks and 3 months (primary endpoint) of controlled intervention. The sample size for a full RCT was estimated based on the change in VAS knee pain between baseline and 3 months. Feasibility was assessed using participant recruitment, intervention adherence, participant response rates, data quality, dropout rate and adverse events. All protocol changes made throughout the duration of the study were recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine participants (13 females; age: 62 ± 9 years) were recruited. The estimated sample size for a full RCT is 93 individuals (31 per group). Participants showed high intervention adherence and follow-up rates were 86% at 3 months. Four participants dropped out of the study, and there were 3 adverse events reported. Changes were made to participant eligibility criteria, recruitment strategy and data collection methods to improve feasibility, efficiency, and appropriateness for a full RCT.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the feasibility of a full scale RCT evaluating the clinical effectiveness of the TCO knee brace compared to the current (conservative) standard of care treatment for individuals with knee OA, and an adequately powered RCT is now warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05543486. Registered 15 September 2022-retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05543486.

摘要

背景

Levitation™“三室卸载器”(TCO)膝关节支具(弹簧加载技术)旨在减轻膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者的疼痛。TCO已上市,但尚未通过对照临床试验与膝关节OA的当前标准治疗方法进行比较。本可行性研究旨在:(i)评估进行全面随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性;(ii)评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)特定活动膝关节疼痛评分的分布特性,以估计全面随机对照试验(RCT)所需的样本量;(iii)完善和优化研究方案。

方法

在加拿大阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里大学对患有中度至重度髌股关节或多室膝关节OA的个体进行了一项前瞻性、3组、平行、单中心可行性随机对照试验。参与者通过1:1:1随机分配被随机分为三个干预组之一:标准治疗(对照组)、对照组加膝关节套筒(套筒组)或对照组加TCO支具(TCO组)。在基线(干预前)以及对照干预6周和3个月(主要终点)后对参与者进行评估。根据基线和3个月之间VAS膝关节疼痛的变化估计全面随机对照试验的样本量。通过参与者招募、干预依从性、参与者反应率、数据质量、退出率和不良事件来评估可行性。记录研究期间所做的所有方案变更。

结果

招募了二十九名参与者(13名女性;年龄:62±9岁)。全面随机对照试验的估计样本量为93人(每组31人)。参与者表现出较高的干预依从性,3个月时的随访率为86%。四名参与者退出了研究,报告了3起不良事件。对参与者入选标准、招募策略和数据收集方法进行了变更,以提高全面随机对照试验的可行性、效率和适用性。

结论

本研究支持进行一项全面随机对照试验的可行性,该试验将评估TCO膝关节支具与膝关节OA患者当前(保守)标准治疗方法相比的临床有效性,现在有必要进行一项有足够效力的随机对照试验。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT05543486。2022年9月15日注册——追溯注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05543486

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9862/12164062/422bfae02ace/40814_2025_1660_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验