• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用贝塔混合模型从类风湿性关节炎健康评估问卷中估计疼痛视觉模拟量表。

Estimating pain visual analogue scale from health assessment questionnaire for rheumatoid arthritis with beta mixture models.

作者信息

Gavan Sean P, Chang Sainan, Rivellese Felice, Ide Zoë, Stadler Michael, Payne Katherine, Plant Darren, Barton Anne, Pitzalis Costantino

机构信息

Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Centre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2025 Jun 14;45(7):154. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05897-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00296-025-05897-1
PMID:40515832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12167326/
Abstract

To map from the health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ) to the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) for people with rheumatoid arthritis. The estimation sample comprised adults with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in a multicentre phase 4 randomised controlled trial. Beta mixture models were estimated with combinations of HAQ and its square, age and sex as independent variables. Bayesian Information Criteria informed the number of components. Model performance (root mean squared error; mean absolute error; pseudo-R) was estimated by k-fold cross validation. Graphs illustrated mean observed and predicted pain VAS, and cumulative distribution of observed and simulated pain VAS values. For face validity, a probabilistic analysis simulated 5000 pain VAS values at four HAQ scores. For external validation, the performance of the preferred specification was assessed using the Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study cohort. There were 1055 observations from 158 participants in the estimation sample (mean age: 55.8; 81% female; mean HAQ: 1.72). The preferred specification was a two-component beta mixture model (probability variables: HAQ, age, sex; main regression variable: HAQ). Visual plots illustrated good fit across the HAQ distribution, and a similar cumulative distribution of observed and predicted pain VAS values. Probabilistic analysis demonstrated that the preferred specification handled uncertainty appropriately. External validation demonstrated that the preferred specification performed well in an independent dataset. Beta mixture models provide accurate non-linear estimates of pain VAS from HAQ scores to support evidence synthesis and resource allocation decision-making for people with rheumatoid arthritis.

摘要

将类风湿性关节炎患者的健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ)映射到疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)。估计样本包括在一项多中心4期随机对照试验中对肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂反应不足的类风湿性关节炎成人患者。以HAQ及其平方、年龄和性别为自变量组合估计β混合模型。贝叶斯信息准则确定了成分数量。通过k折交叉验证估计模型性能(均方根误差、平均绝对误差、伪R)。图表展示了观察到的和预测的疼痛VAS均值,以及观察到的和模拟的疼痛VAS值的累积分布。为了进行表面效度分析,概率分析在四个HAQ分数下模拟了5000个疼痛VAS值。为了进行外部验证,使用类风湿性关节炎药物研究队列评估了首选规格的性能。估计样本中有158名参与者的1055条观察数据(平均年龄:55.8岁;81%为女性;平均HAQ:1.72)。首选规格是一个双成分β混合模型(概率变量:HAQ、年龄、性别;主要回归变量:HAQ)。可视化图表明在HAQ分布范围内拟合良好,观察到的和预测的疼痛VAS值的累积分布相似。概率分析表明首选规格能适当处理不确定性。外部验证表明首选规格在独立数据集中表现良好。β混合模型提供了从HAQ分数到疼痛VAS的准确非线性估计,以支持类风湿性关节炎患者的证据综合和资源分配决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ff/12167326/6e964bb11867/296_2025_5897_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ff/12167326/31b44fbbc811/296_2025_5897_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ff/12167326/68119064f2cd/296_2025_5897_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ff/12167326/b817a153aa27/296_2025_5897_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ff/12167326/6e964bb11867/296_2025_5897_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ff/12167326/31b44fbbc811/296_2025_5897_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ff/12167326/68119064f2cd/296_2025_5897_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ff/12167326/b817a153aa27/296_2025_5897_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ff/12167326/6e964bb11867/296_2025_5897_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating pain visual analogue scale from health assessment questionnaire for rheumatoid arthritis with beta mixture models.使用贝塔混合模型从类风湿性关节炎健康评估问卷中估计疼痛视觉模拟量表。
Rheumatol Int. 2025 Jun 14;45(7):154. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05897-1.
2
Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis unsuccessfully treated with biologics: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂或托法替布用于生物制剂治疗类风湿关节炎失败的患者:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 10;3(3):CD012591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012591.
3
Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Thai version of the Systemic Sclerosis Health Assessment Questionnaire.系统性硬化症健康评估问卷泰语版的验证与跨文化调适
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s10067-025-07553-2.
4
Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis naive to methotrexate: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂或托法替布用于初治类风湿关节炎患者:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 8;5(5):CD012657. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012657.
5
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, tocilizumab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and after the failure of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs only: systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗、戈利木单抗、托珠单抗和阿巴西普用于治疗既往未使用改善病情抗风湿药物治疗且仅在传统改善病情抗风湿药物治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(35):1-610. doi: 10.3310/hta20350.
6
Health Assessment Questionnaire disability progression in early rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and analysis of two inception cohorts.早期类风湿关节炎中健康评估问卷残疾进展:两个起始队列的系统评价与分析
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014 Oct;44(2):131-44. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 9.
7
Biologic or tofacitinib monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis in people with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) failure: a Cochrane Systematic Review and network meta-analysis (NMA).生物制剂或托法替布单药治疗传统抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗失败的类风湿关节炎患者:一项Cochrane系统评价和网状Meta分析(NMA)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):CD012437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012437.
8
Certolizumab pegol (CDP870) for rheumatoid arthritis in adults.聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗(CDP870)用于治疗成人类风湿性关节炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 8;9(9):CD007649. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007649.pub4.
9
Balneotherapy (or spa therapy) for rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎的温泉疗法(或水疗)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 11;2015(4):CD000518. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000518.pub2.
10
Comparative efficacy of biologics as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate on patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs--a systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂单药治疗及与甲氨蝶呤联合治疗对传统改善病情抗风湿药反应不足的类风湿关节炎患者患者报告结局(PROs)的比较疗效——一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jul 3;12:102. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-102.

本文引用的文献

1
Pain catastrophizing in rheumatic diseases: prevalence, origin, and implications.风湿性疾病中的疼痛灾难化:患病率、起源及意义。
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Jun;44(6):985-1002. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05583-8. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
2
Sociodemographic and clinical variables associated with negative illness perception in patients newly diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, or psoriatic arthritis-a survey based cross-sectional study.社会人口学和临床变量与新诊断为类风湿关节炎、轴性脊柱关节炎或银屑病关节炎患者的负面疾病认知相关:一项基于调查的横断面研究。
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Jun;44(6):1119-1131. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05553-0. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
3
Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Continuum of Disease and Strategies for Prediction, Early Intervention, and Prevention.
类风湿关节炎:疾病的连续统一体以及预测、早期干预和预防策略
J Rheumatol. 2024 Apr 1;51(4):337-349. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2023-0334.
4
Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis, 1990-2020, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.1990年至2020年全球、区域和国家类风湿性关节炎负担及到2050年的预测:全球疾病负担研究2021的系统分析
Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 Sep 25;5(10):e594-e610. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00211-4. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Disease activity and disease-related factors are drivers of patient global assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-life cross-sectional study.疾病活动度和与疾病相关的因素是类风湿关节炎患者总体评估的驱动因素:一项真实世界的横断面研究。
Rheumatol Int. 2023 Oct;43(10):1885-1895. doi: 10.1007/s00296-023-05383-6. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
6
Associations between clinical metrics of joint deformity, disease duration, disease activity, functional capacity, quality of life, pain, and fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者关节畸形的临床指标、疾病持续时间、疾病活动度、功能能力、生活质量、疼痛和疲劳之间的关联。
Clin Rheumatol. 2023 Apr;42(4):1027-1038. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06432-4. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
7
Pain catastrophizing in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: biopsychosocial perspective and impact on health-related quality of life.类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和轴性脊柱关节炎中的疼痛灾难化:生物心理社会视角及其对健康相关生活质量的影响
Rheumatol Int. 2022 Apr;42(4):669-682. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-05070-4. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
Use and detailed metric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review covering two decades.类风湿关节炎患者报告结局测量的使用及详细度量属性:涵盖二十年的系统综述。
RMD Open. 2021 Aug;7(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001707.
9
Rituximab versus tocilizumab in anti-TNF inadequate responder patients with rheumatoid arthritis (R4RA): 16-week outcomes of a stratified, biopsy-driven, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 randomised controlled trial.利妥昔单抗与托珠单抗治疗抗 TNF 应答不足的类风湿关节炎患者(R4RA):分层、基于活检、多中心、开放标签、4 期随机对照临床试验的 16 周结果。
Lancet. 2021 Jan 23;397(10271):305-317. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32341-2.
10
Mapping clinical outcomes to generic preference-based outcome measures: development and comparison of methods.将临床结局映射到通用偏好为基础的结局测量指标:方法的制定与比较。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(34):1-68. doi: 10.3310/hta24340.