Hayes Genevieve, Sparks Sierra, Bulte Daniel P, Pinto Joana
Department of Engineering ScienceInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford Oxford United Kingdom.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2025 Jul 1;139(1):219-230. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00107.2025. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
The ability of cerebrovasculature to respond to meet tissue demands is vital for normal brain function and health. Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), a measure of the responsiveness of cerebrovasculature to vasoactive stimuli, is a valuable tool for evaluating cerebrovascular health. Although CVR is commonly assessed using transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD), which measures blood velocity, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based techniques such as blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) imaging, which reflect changes in blood oxygenation, direct comparisons between these modalities remain limited, particularly with stimuli that induce a large dynamic range. Because both methods capture hypercapnia-induced vascular changes, we hypothesized that their CVR metrics may be correlated. This study evaluates intermodality correlations of CVR using TCD and BOLD-functional MRI (fMRI) extracted from the middle cerebral artery territory (parietal lobe) during a ramped hypercapnic protocol and different modeling strategies. Linear correlations across broad end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]) ranges validated the utility of linear CVR modeling in capturing repeatable metrics using TCD and MRI. A four-parameter sigmoid model revealed significant intermodality variability in span and bound parameters, improved by fixing these parameters and focusing on slope and inflection point, which enhanced the correlations between modalities. These results support the reliability of linear CVR modeling within narrow vasoactive response ranges in healthy subjects and propose a simplified two-parameter sigmoid model as an effective framework for characterizing nonlinear CVR dynamics. This work adds to the sparse literature on intermodality CVR comparisons and indicates which CVR metrics are comparable between TCD and BOLD-fMRI, emphasizing CVR as a useful tool for assessing cerebrovascular health in research and clinical contexts. This study compares cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) between transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and BOLD-fMRI using a hypercapnia protocol. Linear intermodality correlations across [Formula: see text] ranges validate linear CVR modeling. Significant variability in a four-parameter sigmoid model was mitigated by fixing span and bound parameters, supporting a two-parameter model for improved agreement but reducing sensitivity to diminished reserve. These findings clarify which CVR metrics are consistent between TCD and BOLD-fMRI, advancing multimodal integration for cerebrovascular health assessment.
脑血管系统响应以满足组织需求的能力对于正常脑功能和健康至关重要。脑血管反应性(CVR)是衡量脑血管系统对血管活性刺激反应性的指标,是评估脑血管健康的重要工具。尽管CVR通常使用测量血流速度的经颅多普勒超声(TCD)或基于磁共振成像(MRI)的技术(如反映血液氧合变化的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)成像)进行评估,但这些方法之间的直接比较仍然有限,特别是对于诱导较大动态范围的刺激。由于这两种方法都能捕捉高碳酸血症引起的血管变化,我们假设它们的CVR指标可能相关。本研究使用TCD和BOLD功能磁共振成像(fMRI)评估在递增高碳酸血症方案和不同建模策略期间从中脑动脉区域(顶叶)提取的CVR的模态间相关性。在广泛的呼气末二氧化碳分压([公式:见正文])范围内的线性相关性验证了线性CVR建模在使用TCD和MRI捕获可重复指标方面的实用性。一个四参数S形模型显示在跨度和边界参数方面存在显著的模态间变异性,通过固定这些参数并关注斜率和拐点可改善这种变异性,这增强了模态之间的相关性。这些结果支持了健康受试者在狭窄血管活性反应范围内线性CVR建模的可靠性,并提出了一个简化的两参数S形模型作为表征非线性CVR动力学的有效框架。这项工作增加了关于模态间CVR比较的稀少文献,并指出了TCD和BOLD-fMRI之间哪些CVR指标具有可比性,强调CVR作为研究和临床环境中评估脑血管健康的有用工具。本研究使用高碳酸血症方案比较经颅多普勒超声(TCD)和BOLD-fMRI之间的脑血管反应性(CVR)。在[公式:见正文]范围内的线性模态间相关性验证了线性CVR建模。通过固定跨度和边界参数减轻了四参数S形模型中的显著变异性,支持两参数模型以提高一致性,但降低了对储备减少的敏感性。这些发现阐明了TCD和BOLD-fMRI之间哪些CVR指标是一致的,推动了脑血管健康评估的多模态整合。