Suppr超能文献

透明矫治器与固定正畸矫治器口腔微生物群的比较综述

A comparative review of the oral microbiome in clear aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances.

作者信息

Marya Anand, Porntaveetus Thantrira, Okazaki Katsushi, Jamilian Abdolreza

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

The City of London Dental School, University of Greater Manchester, London, UK.

出版信息

Evid Based Dent. 2025 Jun 14. doi: 10.1038/s41432-025-01173-0.

Abstract

A COMMENTARY ON

Lucchese A, Marcolina M, Mancini N et al. A comparison of the alterations of oral microbiome with fixed orthodontic therapy and clear aligners: a systematic review. J Oral Microbiol 2025; 17: 2372751.

DATA SOURCES

The review searched multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source) and gray literature (OpenGray) up to May 30, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

The selection of the studies was processed according to PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Full-text articles were then assessed for eligibility based on pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria (RCTs, nRCTs, cohort studies; at least two time points for analysis; minimum 10 patients; clear aligners vs. fixed appliances or comparison between them; patients with good systemic health not taking medications).

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction from the included studies was carried out by two reviewers in consultation with a third reviewer to define the variables for extraction and resolve any disagreements. Extracted data included study characteristics (author, year, design, sample size, patient age), intervention details, sample collection methods (saliva, plaque), microbial analysis methods (16S rRNA sequencing, PCR, BANA test), and microbiological outcomes. A qualitative synthesis was performed due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, precluding meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 484 articles were identified, with 9 studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria: eight non-randomized controlled trials and one randomized controlled trial. Sample sizes ranged from 10 to 77 participants. Various microbial analysis methods were employed, including 16S rRNA gene sequencing (5 studies), PCR (3 studies), and the BANA test (1 study). Following the application of rating scales, 1 article was classified as having a low risk of bias, 6 as having a moderate risk, and 2 as having a serious risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The review suggests that clear aligners may be associated with a less detrimental impact on the oral microbiome compared to fixed appliances, possibly due to improved oral hygiene. Both therapies alter the oral microbiome; however, the changes caused by aligners are more conducive to better oral health compared to fixed appliances.

摘要

评论

卢切塞A、马尔科利纳M、曼奇尼N等。固定正畸治疗与透明矫治器对口腔微生物群改变的比较:一项系统评价。《口腔微生物学杂志》2025年;17: 2372751。

数据来源

该评价检索了多个电子数据库(PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、Ovid、牙科学与口腔科学来源数据库)以及截至2023年5月30日的灰色文献(OpenGray)。

研究选择

研究选择按照PRISMA指南进行。两名评审员独立筛选标题和摘要,如有分歧则由第三名评审员解决。然后根据预先定义的纳入/排除标准(随机对照试验、非随机对照试验、队列研究;至少两个分析时间点;至少10名患者;透明矫治器与固定矫治器或两者之间的比较;全身健康状况良好且未服用药物的患者)评估全文文章的 eligibility。

数据提取与综合

由两名评审员在第三名评审员的参与下从纳入研究中提取数据,以确定提取变量并解决任何分歧。提取的数据包括研究特征(作者、年份、设计、样本量、患者年龄)、干预细节、样本收集方法(唾液、牙菌斑)、微生物分析方法(16S rRNA测序、聚合酶链反应、BANA试验)以及微生物学结果。由于纳入研究的异质性,进行了定性综合分析,排除了荟萃分析。

结果

共识别出484篇文章,其中9项研究符合纳入和排除标准:8项非随机对照试验和1项随机对照试验。样本量从10至77名参与者不等。采用了多种微生物分析方法,包括16S rRNA基因测序(5项研究)、聚合酶链反应(3项研究)和BANA试验(1项研究)。应用评分量表后,1篇文章被归类为偏倚风险低,6篇为中度风险,2篇为严重偏倚风险。

结论

该评价表明,与固定矫治器相比,透明矫治器可能对口腔微生物群的有害影响较小,这可能是由于口腔卫生得到改善。两种治疗方法都会改变口腔微生物群;然而,与固定矫治器相比,矫治器引起的变化更有利于口腔健康。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验