Suppr超能文献

在性唤起状态和睡眠期间的阴道脉搏振幅反应模式。

Vaginal pulse amplitude response patterns during erotic conditions and sleep.

作者信息

Rogers G S, Van de Castle R L, Evans W S, Critelli J W

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 1985 Aug;14(4):327-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01550848.

Abstract

Vaginal photoplethysmography has been used to investigate sexual arousal response patterns in small samples of sexually functional and dysfunctional women, but selection of subjects for these studies has not been of a standardized nature. In the present study, two groups of women, who placed in either the upper or lower percentile ranks on the Sexual Arousal Inventory (Hoon et al., 1976a), were compared on a physiological measure of sexual arousal, vaginal pulse amplitude (VPA), during both waking erotic conditions and sleep. As hypothesized, no differences in VPA were found between groups during either waking or sleeping conditions. Contrary to expectation, groups also did not differ on subjective ratings of their laboratory arousal. With both groups combined, differences in VPA levels were evident between baseline and erotic conditions. Similarly, VPA levels differed between stages of sleep, with highest levels observed during rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep. These findings suggest that self-reported low arousability is not based on lack of physiological response and that retrospective, self-report measures of sexual arousability differ in important ways from subjective and physiological measures of sexual arousal in the laboratory. In order to adequately assess sexual arousability, future researchers must either devise laboratory conditions that more closely resemble erotic stimuli occurring in subjects' natural environments or validate physiological measures of arousal in nonlaboratory settings. Finally, the nocturnal evaluation of VPA seems potentially useful for cases in which organic factors may be contributing to sexual dysfunction.

摘要

阴道光电容积描记法已被用于研究性功能正常和性功能障碍女性的小样本中的性唤起反应模式,但这些研究的受试者选择并非标准化。在本研究中,比较了两组女性,她们在性唤起量表(Hoon等人,1976a)上处于高百分位或低百分位,在清醒的性唤起条件和睡眠期间,通过性唤起的生理指标阴道脉搏振幅(VPA)进行比较。正如假设的那样,在清醒或睡眠条件下,两组之间的VPA没有差异。与预期相反,两组在实验室性唤起的主观评分上也没有差异。将两组合并后,基线和性唤起条件之间的VPA水平存在明显差异。同样,VPA水平在睡眠阶段也有所不同,在快速眼动(REM)睡眠期间观察到最高水平。这些发现表明,自我报告的低唤起能力并非基于缺乏生理反应,而且性唤起能力的回顾性自我报告测量在重要方面与实验室中性唤起的主观和生理测量不同。为了充分评估性唤起能力,未来的研究人员必须要么设计出更类似于受试者自然环境中出现的性刺激的实验室条件,要么在非实验室环境中验证性唤起的生理测量方法。最后,VPA的夜间评估对于有机因素可能导致性功能障碍的病例似乎具有潜在的用途。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验