Wegner Gustavo R M, Wegner Bruno F M, Cumming Henrique S, de Oliveira Henrik G, Campos Letícia R, da Silva Luiz H D, Ferreira Carlos H O, Miranda Alesson M, Donato André B, do Nascimento Tatiana S
Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (UFFS), Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
J Clin Anesth. 2025 Jul;105:111903. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111903. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
To identify the most effective premedication strategies for improving mask acceptance, parental separation acceptance, and intravenous cannulation acceptance in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia.
A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Elective pediatric surgeries under general anesthesia.
Children aged 1-12 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III, who received premedication with midazolam, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or other relevant agents and combinations.
Two main analyses were conducted using a Bayesian framework to generate comparative efficacy rankings. A primary analysis considered every unique combination of drug, dose, route, and timing as a distinct intervention. A secondary analysis grouped interventions solely by the pharmacological agent(s) used, regardless of dose, route, or timing. This dual approach allowed specific comparisons of route and dose while also providing a broader assessment of each drug or combination. Outcomes were satisfactory acceptance of mask application, parental separation, and intravenous cannulation. Meta-regression, sensitivity analyses, and assessment of risk of bias were also undertaken.
Sixty-nine trials encompassing 5794 pediatric patients were included. In the primary analysis, only mask acceptance could be evaluated. Combinations of dexmedetomidine, midazolam, and ketamine demonstrated the highest probabilities of satisfactory mask acceptance, with intranasal administration at shorter premedication intervals (15-30 min) showing greater efficacy. Clonidine, melatonin, and diazepam were comparatively less effective. In the secondary analysis, mask acceptance, intravenous cannulation acceptance, and parental separation acceptance yielded similar findings, with pharmacological combinations based on dexmedetomidine and midazolam ranking highest, while clonidine, melatonin, and diazepam remained less effective.
Dexmedetomidine-, midazolam-, and ketamine-based combinations offer superior preoperative cooperation in pediatric patients, as demonstrated by higher success rates of mask acceptance, intravenous cannulation acceptance, and parental separation acceptance. Routes, doses, and timing are critical factors influencing success.
确定在接受全身麻醉的儿科患者中,提高面罩接受度、父母分离接受度和静脉置管接受度的最有效术前用药策略。
对随机对照试验进行系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
全身麻醉下的择期小儿外科手术。
1 - 12岁儿童,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I - III级,接受咪达唑仑、右美托咪定、氯胺酮或其他相关药物及联合用药进行术前用药。
使用贝叶斯框架进行两项主要分析,以生成比较疗效排名。主要分析将药物、剂量、途径和时间的每一种独特组合视为一种独特的干预措施。次要分析仅根据所使用的药理药物对干预措施进行分组,而不考虑剂量、途径或时间。这种双重方法允许对途径和剂量进行具体比较,同时也能对每种药物或组合进行更广泛的评估。结局指标为对面罩应用、父母分离和静脉置管的满意接受度。还进行了Meta回归、敏感性分析和偏倚风险评估。
纳入了69项试验,涉及5794例儿科患者。在主要分析中,仅能对面罩接受度进行评估。右美托咪定、咪达唑仑和氯胺酮的联合用药显示出最高的面罩满意接受概率,在较短的术前用药间隔(15 - 30分钟)经鼻给药显示出更高的疗效。可乐定、褪黑素和地西泮的效果相对较差。在次要分析中,面罩接受度、静脉置管接受度和父母分离接受度得出了类似的结果,基于右美托咪定和咪达唑仑的药理联合用药排名最高,而可乐定、褪黑素和地西泮仍然效果较差。
基于右美托咪定、咪达唑仑和氯胺酮的联合用药在儿科患者中提供了更好的术前合作,这通过更高的面罩接受度、静脉置管接受度和父母分离接受度成功率得到证明。途径、剂量和时间是影响成功的关键因素。