Suppr超能文献

Postoperative outcomes of general vs regional anesthesia for lower extremity amputation.

作者信息

McDonnell Shannon M, O'Meara Rylie, Helenowski Irena, Halandras Pegge M

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Health System, Chicago, IL; Division of Vascular Diseases and Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Health System, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2025 Oct;82(4):1450-1457. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.06.009. Epub 2025 Jun 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances to open and endovascular surgery, lower extremity amputation remains an essential component of vascular surgery. Regional anesthesia with peripheral nerve blocks can help avoid the postoperative morbidity associated with general anesthesia. Despite regional anesthesia as an option for patients, a recent large database study found that up to 90% of cases were still performed under general anesthesia. The aim of our study was to further evaluate if there is a significant difference in surgical outcomes that supports the use of regional over general anesthesia.

METHODS

This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients who received lower extremity amputations from January 1, 2019, until December 31, 2023. Above- and below-knee amputations were included, and all amputations were performed by vascular surgeons. Patients were divided into three groups based on the anesthesia type they received during the case: general anesthesia, general and regional block, and regional block only. Patient characteristics, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes were then studied for each group. Continuous variables are summarized by medians and interquartile ranges, whereas categorical variables are summarized by frequencies and percentages. As there were repeated measures for several patients, generalized estimating equations models with anesthesia group as the response were fit to assess differences between anesthesia groups. Multivariable models were fit assuming a binomial distribution, Poisson distribution, or multinomial distribution.

RESULTS

A total of 176 amputations were included in this study, of whom 55 (35%) received regional block only, 94 (60%) received general anesthesia and block, and 27 (15%) received only general anesthesia. Above-knee amputations were performed in 74 patients (42%), and below-knee amputations were performed in 102 patients (58%) in the study. The block-only group was significantly associated with an older population (P = .006) and significantly associated with higher percentages of congestive heart failure (P = .001), chronic kidney disease (P = .006), and diabetes (P = .002). The general-only group had higher postoperative morbidity, with significantly higher percentages of pulmonary embolism (P < .001), deep vein thrombosis (P < .001), pneumonia (P = .032), and postoperative ventilator use (P < .001). The general-only group had significantly longer hospital length of stay (P = .03) and higher rates of expiration (P = .002). On multivariable analysis, receiving general anesthesia only was significantly associated with a 30-day (P = .009), 60-day (P = .009), and 1-year mortality (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the use of general anesthesia for lower extremity amputation has a significant and independent correlation with higher 30-day, 60-day, and 1-year mortality rates. Thus, a continued shift toward regional blocks in patients facing lower extremity amputation is indicated.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验