Jackisch Christian, Shimizu Chikako, Flood Emuella, Will Oliver, McCutcheon Susan, Mokiou Stella, Guillaume Xavier, Mulvihill Emily, Beusterien Kathleen
Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte gGmbH, Essen, Germany.
Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Future Oncol. 2025 Aug;21(18):2311-2319. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2517000. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
This study assessed patient preferences for four clinical trial pathways, which include multiple sequential treatments, in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early-stage breast cancer (eBC). It presents an innovative application for a discrete choice experiment (DCE), yielding single-preference weights for complex pathways.
MATERIALS & METHODS: Patients in Germany, Italy, and Japan with stage II/III BC completed an online DCE, which included a series of choice tasks with two hypothetical treatment profiles that varied in attributes associated with four eBC treatment pathways: overall pathway (event-free survival, fixed versus flexible, duration) and treatment-specific (side effects, regimen). Bayes modeling was used to estimate preference weights for each attribute level. Preferences for different eBC pathways were calculated by summing the respective pathway and treatment weights, adjusted for the duration of the respective treatments along the pathway. Mean pathway preference weights were compared among the four pathways and countries using analyses of variance.
Pathway preferences were highly sensitive to treatment toxicity and surgical response. Additionally, a flexible pathway was preferred as it can mean a shorter pathway duration.
Discussions with patients should be personalized per individual preferences and should cover the entire treatment pathway, not just the initial treatment step.
本研究评估了人类表皮生长因子受体2阴性早期乳腺癌(eBC)患者对四种临床试验途径的偏好,其中包括多种序贯治疗。它展示了离散选择实验(DCE)的一种创新应用,为复杂途径得出单一偏好权重。
德国、意大利和日本的II/III期乳腺癌患者完成了一项在线DCE,其中包括一系列选择任务,每个任务有两种假设的治疗方案,这些方案在与四种eBC治疗途径相关的属性方面有所不同:总体途径(无事件生存期、固定与灵活、持续时间)和特定治疗(副作用、治疗方案)。采用贝叶斯模型估计每个属性水平的偏好权重。通过将各自途径和治疗权重相加,并根据沿途径的各自治疗持续时间进行调整,计算对不同eBC途径的偏好。使用方差分析比较四个途径和国家之间的平均途径偏好权重。
途径偏好对治疗毒性和手术反应高度敏感。此外,灵活途径更受青睐,因为这可能意味着途径持续时间更短。
与患者的讨论应根据个人偏好进行个性化,并应涵盖整个治疗途径,而不仅仅是初始治疗步骤。