• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期乳腺癌患者对治疗途径的偏好:离散选择实验的应用

Patient preferences for treatment pathways in early-stage breast cancer: application of a discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Jackisch Christian, Shimizu Chikako, Flood Emuella, Will Oliver, McCutcheon Susan, Mokiou Stella, Guillaume Xavier, Mulvihill Emily, Beusterien Kathleen

机构信息

Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte gGmbH, Essen, Germany.

Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Future Oncol. 2025 Aug;21(18):2311-2319. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2517000. Epub 2025 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1080/14796694.2025.2517000
PMID:40518803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12323413/
Abstract

AIM

This study assessed patient preferences for four clinical trial pathways, which include multiple sequential treatments, in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early-stage breast cancer (eBC). It presents an innovative application for a discrete choice experiment (DCE), yielding single-preference weights for complex pathways.

MATERIALS & METHODS: Patients in Germany, Italy, and Japan with stage II/III BC completed an online DCE, which included a series of choice tasks with two hypothetical treatment profiles that varied in attributes associated with four eBC treatment pathways: overall pathway (event-free survival, fixed versus flexible, duration) and treatment-specific (side effects, regimen). Bayes modeling was used to estimate preference weights for each attribute level. Preferences for different eBC pathways were calculated by summing the respective pathway and treatment weights, adjusted for the duration of the respective treatments along the pathway. Mean pathway preference weights were compared among the four pathways and countries using analyses of variance.

RESULTS

Pathway preferences were highly sensitive to treatment toxicity and surgical response. Additionally, a flexible pathway was preferred as it can mean a shorter pathway duration.

CONCLUSION

Discussions with patients should be personalized per individual preferences and should cover the entire treatment pathway, not just the initial treatment step.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了人类表皮生长因子受体2阴性早期乳腺癌(eBC)患者对四种临床试验途径的偏好,其中包括多种序贯治疗。它展示了离散选择实验(DCE)的一种创新应用,为复杂途径得出单一偏好权重。

材料与方法

德国、意大利和日本的II/III期乳腺癌患者完成了一项在线DCE,其中包括一系列选择任务,每个任务有两种假设的治疗方案,这些方案在与四种eBC治疗途径相关的属性方面有所不同:总体途径(无事件生存期、固定与灵活、持续时间)和特定治疗(副作用、治疗方案)。采用贝叶斯模型估计每个属性水平的偏好权重。通过将各自途径和治疗权重相加,并根据沿途径的各自治疗持续时间进行调整,计算对不同eBC途径的偏好。使用方差分析比较四个途径和国家之间的平均途径偏好权重。

结果

途径偏好对治疗毒性和手术反应高度敏感。此外,灵活途径更受青睐,因为这可能意味着途径持续时间更短。

结论

与患者的讨论应根据个人偏好进行个性化,并应涵盖整个治疗途径,而不仅仅是初始治疗步骤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/439a/12323413/6e2b37e9891c/IFON_A_2517000_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/439a/12323413/39b48b645c60/IFON_A_2517000_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/439a/12323413/ce9ae45c5adc/IFON_A_2517000_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/439a/12323413/6e2b37e9891c/IFON_A_2517000_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/439a/12323413/39b48b645c60/IFON_A_2517000_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/439a/12323413/ce9ae45c5adc/IFON_A_2517000_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/439a/12323413/6e2b37e9891c/IFON_A_2517000_F0003_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient preferences for treatment pathways in early-stage breast cancer: application of a discrete choice experiment.早期乳腺癌患者对治疗途径的偏好:离散选择实验的应用
Future Oncol. 2025 Aug;21(18):2311-2319. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2517000. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Patient Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment Among Patients in Five Non-Western Countries.炎症性肠病患者对治疗属性的偏好:五个非西方国家患者的离散选择实验
Adv Ther. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03249-w.
3
Patient Preferences for HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer Adjuvant Treatment: A Multicountry Discrete Choice Experiment.HR+/HER2-早期乳腺癌辅助治疗的患者偏好:一项多国离散选择实验
Breast Care (Basel). 2025 Mar 3;20(1):16-26. doi: 10.1159/000543320. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
4
Using a Discrete Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Physical Therapist Services After Surgery for Breast Cancer.
Phys Ther. 2025 Jul 1;105(7). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaf077.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Discrete Choice Experiment Versus Best-Worst Scaling: An Empirical Comparison in Eliciting Young People's Preferences for Web-Based Mental Health Interventions.离散选择实验与最佳-最差标度法:关于激发年轻人对基于网络的心理健康干预措施偏好的实证比较
Patient. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00739-5.
9
Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.压力性尿失禁女性的外科治疗:ESTER系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(14):1-306. doi: 10.3310/hta23140.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
A Novel Approach to Computing Preference Estimates for Different Treatment Pathways: An Application in Oncology.一种计算不同治疗路径偏好估计的新方法:在肿瘤学中的应用。
Patient. 2024 Jul;17(4):397-406. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00680-z. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
2
Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.早期乳腺癌:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2024 Feb;35(2):159-182. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.016. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
Understanding breast cancer complexity to improve patient outcomes: The St Gallen International Consensus Conference for the Primary Therapy of Individuals with Early Breast Cancer 2023.
了解乳腺癌的复杂性以改善患者结局:2023 年圣加仑国际乳腺癌早期个体化治疗共识会议。
Ann Oncol. 2023 Nov;34(11):970-986. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.017. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
4
Discrete choice experiment with duration versus time trade-off: a comparison of test-retest reliability of health utility elicitation approaches in SF-6Dv2 valuation.离散选择实验中的持续时间与时间权衡:SF-6Dv2 估值中健康效用 elicitation 方法的重测信度比较。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Sep;31(9):2791-2803. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03159-2. Epub 2022 May 25.
5
Event-free Survival with Pembrolizumab in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.帕博利珠单抗治疗早期三阴性乳腺癌无事件生存。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 10;386(6):556-567. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112651.
6
Patient and Caregiver Preferences for First-Line Treatments of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment.转移性非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的患者及照护者偏好:一项离散选择实验
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Jan 15;16:123-135. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S338840. eCollection 2022.
7
Updates on breast biomarkers.乳腺生物标志物的最新进展
Virchows Arch. 2022 Jan;480(1):163-176. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03267-x. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
8
Why Does Patient-Physician Communication Matter? More Active Patients, Decreased Healthcare Use and Costs.为什么医患沟通很重要?患者更积极主动,医疗保健使用和成本降低。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Aug 10;8:23743735211036524. doi: 10.1177/23743735211036524. eCollection 2021.
9
The Basic Science of Patient-Physician Communication: A Critical Scoping Review.医患沟通的基础科学:一项关键范围综述。
Acad Med. 2021 Nov 1;96(11S):S109-S118. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004323.
10
Line of therapy and patient preferences regarding lung cancer treatment: a discrete-choice experiment.治疗方案选择和肺癌治疗相关的患者偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Apr;37(4):643-653. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1888707. Epub 2021 Mar 1.