Donahue A M, Letowski T
Audiology. 1985;24(5):362-73. doi: 10.3109/00206098509078354.
The aim of this study was to measure vibrotactile sensitivity and stress pattern recognition of untrained normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Vibrotactile thresholds were measured as a function of frequency with two vibrators at three body placements. Stress pattern recognition was tested with two vibrators at two body placements. Vibrotactile threshold results indicate that wrist placements were less sensitive than fingertip placement and the hearing-impaired subjects were equally or less sensitive than the normal-hearing subjects. Vibrator plunger size had the greatest effect on threshold in the most sensitive frequency range of the skin. Stress pattern recognition results indicate that subject performance is a function of body placement but not a function of plunger size. Moreover, stress pattern recognition curves obtained in this study had lower plateaus for the hearing-impaired subjects than for the normal-hearing subjects. Implications for vibrotactile training are discussed.
本研究的目的是测量未经训练的听力正常和听力受损受试者的振动触觉敏感度和应力模式识别能力。使用两个振动器在三个身体部位测量振动触觉阈值随频率的变化。在两个身体部位使用两个振动器测试应力模式识别能力。振动触觉阈值结果表明,手腕部位的敏感度低于指尖部位,且听力受损受试者的敏感度与听力正常受试者相当或更低。在皮肤最敏感的频率范围内,振动器柱塞大小对阈值影响最大。应力模式识别结果表明,受试者的表现是身体部位的函数,而非柱塞大小的函数。此外,本研究中获得的应力模式识别曲线显示,听力受损受试者的平稳段低于听力正常受试者。文中还讨论了振动触觉训练的意义。