Weng Yu-Ching, Hsieh Chia-Hsien, Liang Ben Chung-Pin
From the Department of Dermatology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Dermatology Department, Aesthetic Medicine Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jun 13;13(6):e6899. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006899. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Current literature lacks guidelines on the optimal treatment number of threads for specific indications and provides limited evidence on the efficacy of combining thread lift with other materials or devices for synergistic effects.
This study evaluates the therapeutic outcomes of combining thread lift therapy with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Fifty-eight participants, divided into 2 groups of 29, received 3 treatments, each involving unilateral insertion of four 17-cm-long barbed Miracle threads and 200 lines of ultrasound therapy with a 4.5-mm UTIMS probe on the middle and lower face.
Wilcoxon signed-rank tests showed significant improvements in physician-evaluated Merz aesthetic scores between the second and first visits (Z = -6.057, < 0.01), the third and second visits (Z = -5.112, < 0.01), and between the photograph session and both the third (Z = -5.425, < 0.01) and first visits cumulatively (Z = -4.943, < 0.01). Additionally, Wilcoxon 2-tailed signed-rank test revealed significant reductions in jowl fat pad distance across treatment sessions.
The treatment sequence did not affect facial lifting outcomes, and 3 sessions of combined thread lift and high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy sustained effects in partial participants.
目前的文献缺乏针对特定适应症的最佳线体治疗数量指南,且关于线雕与其他材料或设备联合使用以产生协同效应的疗效证据有限。
本研究评估线雕疗法与高强度聚焦超声联合治疗的效果。58名参与者被分为两组,每组29人,接受3次治疗,每次治疗均包括在中下面部单侧植入4根17厘米长的带刺Miracle线体以及使用4.5毫米UTIMS探头进行200线次的超声治疗。
威尔科克森符号秩检验显示,医师评估的默茨美学评分在第二次与第一次就诊之间(Z = -6.057,P < 0.01)、第三次与第二次就诊之间(Z = -5.112,P < 0.01)以及拍照时与第三次就诊(Z = -5.425,P < 0.01)和第一次就诊累计(Z = -4.943,P < 0.01)相比均有显著改善。此外,威尔科克森双尾符号秩检验显示整个治疗过程中颊脂垫距离显著减小。
治疗顺序不影响面部提升效果,3次线雕与高强度聚焦超声联合治疗在部分参与者中维持了效果。