Baum William M
University of California, Davis, and University of New Hampshire, 1305 Boulevard Way, Apt. 302, Walnut Creek, CA 94595 USA.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 May 21;48(2):173-202. doi: 10.1007/s40614-025-00455-3. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Some of the most basic phenomena in behavior analysis are the differences between performance on interval and ratio schedules. They have long been known and long puzzled over. Previous attempts to explain the performances have foundered either because they lacked a mechanism or because they adopted a molecular view of behavior based on discrete responses and contiguity. The molar view of behavior offers the sought-for explanation of differences in activity rate and the inability of ratio schedules to maintain activity at low food rates. The present account relies on induction by phylogenetically important events (PIE) according to power functions, molar feedback functions, and the framework of matching theory. A model described by a feedback system with all parameters the same predicts the relations between activity rate and PIE rate. The difference in overall activity rate arises from a difference in units of activities selected by ratio and interval schedules. The results demonstrate the greater explanatory power of the molar view of behavior.
行为分析中一些最基本的现象是间隔强化程序和比率强化程序下表现的差异。这些差异早已为人所知,也长期令人困惑。以往解释这些表现的尝试均告失败,要么是因为缺乏一种机制,要么是因为它们采用了基于离散反应和接近性的行为分子观点。行为的整体观点为活动速率的差异以及比率强化程序在低食物供应速率下无法维持活动提供了人们所寻求的解释。本论述依据系统发育重要事件(PIE)的诱导,基于幂函数、整体反馈函数以及匹配理论的框架。一个由所有参数相同的反馈系统描述的模型预测了活动速率与PIE速率之间的关系。整体活动速率的差异源于比率强化程序和间隔强化程序所选择的活动单位的差异。结果证明了行为整体观点具有更强的解释力。