Qin Tao, Hu Tiantian, Dan Yuzhuo, Qiu Cheng, Chen Mei, Kong Fanjing, Huang Sha, Zhai Zhenwei, Xu Ying, Sun Tao
Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Sichuan, Chengdu, China.
Front Neurol. 2025 May 30;16:1574338. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1574338. eCollection 2025.
To clarify the effectiveness of Low-frequency electrical stimulation (LFES) in treating Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP), identify the therapeutic effects of different treatment parameters, and provide evidence-based recommendations.
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and China Science and Technology Journal Database up to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LFES with comparable single rehabilitation interventions, placebo/sham treatments, or conventional rehabilitation were included. The included outcomes were pain intensity and motor function in the upper extremities. The systematic review protocol is available on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number: CRD42023493979).
A total of eight studies (341 participants) were included. LFES showed significant therapeutic effects on shoulder pain scores (SMD = -0.68; 95% CI: [-1.18, -0.18], = 2.69, = 0.006, = 76%). However, the improvement in upper limb motor function (MD = 8.50; 95% CI: [5.12, 11.88], = 4.93, < 0.001, = 16%) was influenced by a single study with lower methodological quality. Subgroup analyses examined factors such as control group type, stimulation type, duration, frequency, pulse width, and stimulation area. The variations in therapeutic effects of LFES across different treatment parameters, different hemiplegic sides, and different stimulation areas were further explored by subgroup analysis.
The meta-analysis results indicate that LFES has significant positive effects on alleviating HSP, but its effect on improving motor function requires cautious interpretation due to potential bias.
International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identifier: CRD42023493979.
阐明低频电刺激(LFES)治疗偏瘫肩痛(HSP)的有效性,确定不同治疗参数的治疗效果,并提供循证建议。
检索截至2023年10月的PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、万方数据和中国科技期刊数据库。纳入比较LFES与类似单一康复干预、安慰剂/假治疗或传统康复的随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入的结局指标为上肢疼痛强度和运动功能。系统评价方案可在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)上获取(注册号:CRD42023493979)。
共纳入8项研究(341名参与者)。LFES对肩部疼痛评分显示出显著治疗效果(标准化均数差[SMD]= -0.68;95%可信区间:[-1.18,-0.18],Z = 2.69,P = 0.006,I² = 76%)。然而,上肢运动功能的改善(平均差[MD]= 8.50;95%可信区间:[5.12,11.88],Z = 4.93,P < 0.001,I² = 16%)受到一项方法学质量较低的单一研究的影响。亚组分析考察了对照组类型、刺激类型、持续时间、频率、脉冲宽度和刺激区域等因素。通过亚组分析进一步探讨了LFES在不同治疗参数、不同偏瘫侧和不同刺激区域的治疗效果差异。
荟萃分析结果表明,LFES对缓解HSP有显著的积极作用,但由于潜在偏倚,其对改善运动功能的作用需要谨慎解读。
国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO),标识符:CRD42023493979。