Pierrard Julien, Audag Nicolas, Massih Christel Abdel, Garcia Maria Alvear, Moreno Enrique Alvarez, Colot Andrea, Jardinet Simon, Mony Romain, Nevez Marques Ana Francisca, Servaes Lola, Tison Thaïs, den Bossche Valentin Van, Etume Aniko Wale, Zouheir Lamyae, Ooteghem Geneviève Van
Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 May 22;53:100983. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100983. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) during liver stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is degraded by respiratory motion artefacts, potentially jeopardising treatment accuracy. Mechanically assisted non-invasive ventilation-induced breath-hold (MANIV-BH) can reduce these artefacts. This study compares MANIV-BH and free-breathing CBCTs regarding image quality, IGRT variability, automatic registration accuracy, and deep-learning auto-segmentation performance.
Liver SABR CBCTs were presented blindly to 14 operators: 25 patients with FB and 25 with MANIV-BH. They rated CBCT quality and IGRT ease (rigid registration with planning CT). Interoperator IGRT variability was compared between FB and MANIV-BH. Automatic gross tumour volume (GTV) mapping accuracy was compared using automatic rigid registration and image-guided deformable registration. Deep-learning organ-at-risk (OAR) auto-segmentation was rated by an operator, who recorded the time dedicated for manual correction of these volumes.
MANIV-BH significantly improved CBCT image quality ("Excellent"/"Good": 83.4 % versus 25.4 % with FB, p < 0.001), facilitated IGRT ("Very easy"/"Easy": 68.0 % versus 38.9 % with FB, p < 0.001), and reduced IGRT variability, particularly for trained operators (overall variability of 3.2 mm versus 4.6 mm with FB, p = 0.010). MANIV-BH improved deep-learning auto-segmentation performance (80.0 % rated "Excellent"/"Good" versus 4.0 % with FB, p < 0.001), and reduced median manual correction time by 54.2 % compared to FB (p < 0.001). However, automatic GTV mapping accuracy was not significantly different between MANIV-BH and FB.
In liver SABR, MANIV-BH significantly improves CBCT quality, reduces interoperator IGRT variability, and enhances OAR auto-segmentation. Beyond being safe and effective for respiratory motion mitigation, MANIV increases accuracy during treatment delivery, although its implementation requires resources.
在肝脏立体定向消融放疗(SABR)期间,用于图像引导放疗(IGRT)的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)会因呼吸运动伪影而质量下降,这可能会危及治疗准确性。机械辅助无创通气诱导屏气(MANIV-BH)可减少这些伪影。本研究比较了MANIV-BH和自由呼吸CBCT在图像质量、IGRT变异性、自动配准准确性和深度学习自动分割性能方面的差异。
将肝脏SABR的CBCT图像盲目呈现给14名操作人员:25例自由呼吸(FB)患者和25例MANIV-BH患者。他们对CBCT质量和IGRT操作难易程度(与计划CT进行刚性配准)进行评分。比较FB和MANIV-BH之间不同操作人员的IGRT变异性。使用自动刚性配准和图像引导的可变形配准比较自动大体肿瘤体积(GTV)映射的准确性。由一名操作人员对深度学习危及器官(OAR)自动分割进行评分,该操作人员记录用于手动校正这些体积的时间。
MANIV-BH显著提高了CBCT图像质量(“优秀”/“良好”:83.4%,而FB为25.4%,p<0.001),便于进行IGRT(“非常容易”/“容易”:68.0%,而FB为38.9%,p<0.001),并降低了IGRT变异性,尤其是对于训练有素的操作人员(总体变异性为3.2mm,而FB为4.6mm,p=0.010)。MANIV-BH改善了深度学习自动分割性能(80.0%评为“优秀”/“良好”,而FB为4.0%,p<0.001),与FB相比,手动校正时间中位数减少了54.2%(p<0.001)。然而,MANIV-BH和FB之间的自动GTV映射准确性没有显著差异。
在肝脏SABR中,MANIV-BH显著提高了CBCT质量,降低了不同操作人员之间的IGRT变异性,并增强了OAR自动分割。MANIV除了对减轻呼吸运动安全有效外,还提高了治疗实施过程中的准确性,尽管其实施需要资源。