Lall Rina, Yang Seungmi
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 May 19;3(1):e002584. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2025-002584. eCollection 2025.
We aimed to synthesise the current literature to better understand the scope and impacts of immigration policies and programmes on the health and development of immigrant mothers and their children.
Six databases (Scopus, Embase, Medline, Global Health, CINAHL and Public Health Database) were systematically searched from inception to October 2022 using keywords and subject headings for immigration, policy/programme and maternal/perinatal/paediatric outcomes. We analysed policies by the services or processes they affected, whether they restricted or supported immigrants' access or eligibility, and by maternal/perinatal or paediatric outcomes, using a narrative synthesis.
Out of 10 105 identified studies, 65 met our inclusion criteria. Eligible studies were published from 2000 onwards and evaluated outcomes over periods that ranged from 1980 to 2019. Most studies focused on immigrants in the USA (n=54, 83.1%), and many employed quasi-experimental methods (n=42, 64.6%). Commonly evaluated policies or programmes were related to health insurance and access to other public benefits (n=22, 33.8%), followed by those related to naturalisation or legalisation (n=8, 12.3%), and the selection, reception or integration of immigrants (n=8, 12.3%). Overall, paediatric outcomes (n=40, 61.5%) were examined more than maternal or perinatal outcomes (n=29, 44.6%). Few studies explored postpartum care (n=2, 3.1%), childhood vaccination (n=1, 1.5%) or mental health outcomes (n=5, 7.7%). Restrictive immigration policies were not associated with birth outcomes but negatively impacted prenatal care and healthcare utilisation among vulnerable subgroups of immigrant women. Supportive policies were associated with improvements in prenatal care among immigrant mothers, an increase in health insurance coverage among children, and positive impacts on child educational outcomes.
Research on the impacts of immigrant-specific policies and programmes on maternal and child outcomes remains limited, primarily focusing on the immigrant receiving context in the USA. More research from other countries is needed to better understand policy impacts on a global scale. Future studies should consider a broader range of indicators that include postpartum outcomes, childhood vaccination and mental health.
我们旨在综合当前文献,以更好地了解移民政策和计划对移民母亲及其子女的健康与发展的范围和影响。
从数据库创建至2022年10月,系统检索了六个数据库(Scopus、Embase、Medline、Global Health、CINAHL和公共卫生数据库),使用了关于移民、政策/计划以及孕产妇/围产期/儿科结局的关键词和主题词。我们通过政策所影响的服务或流程、它们是限制还是支持移民的获取或资格,以及孕产妇/围产期或儿科结局,采用叙述性综合分析对政策进行了分析。
在10105项确定的研究中,65项符合我们的纳入标准。符合条件的研究自2000年起发表,评估的时间段从1980年至2019年不等。大多数研究聚焦于美国的移民(n = 54,83.1%),许多研究采用了准实验方法(n = 42,64.6%)。常见的评估政策或计划与医疗保险及获取其他公共福利相关(n = 22,33.8%),其次是与入籍或合法化相关的政策(n = 8,12.3%),以及移民的选拔、接纳或融入相关政策(n = 8,12.3%)。总体而言,对儿科结局的研究(n = 40,61.5%)比对孕产妇或围产期结局的研究(n = 29,44.6%)更多。很少有研究探讨产后护理(n = 2,3.1%)、儿童疫苗接种(n = 1,1.5%)或心理健康结局(n = 5,7.7%)。限制性移民政策与出生结局无关,但对弱势移民妇女亚群体的产前护理和医疗保健利用产生了负面影响。支持性政策与移民母亲产前护理的改善、儿童医疗保险覆盖率的提高以及对儿童教育结局的积极影响相关。
关于针对移民的政策和计划对母婴结局影响的研究仍然有限,主要集中在美国的移民接收环境。需要其他国家开展更多研究,以更好地了解全球范围内政策的影响。未来的研究应考虑更广泛的指标,包括产后结局、儿童疫苗接种和心理健康。