One- versus three-month DAPT after everolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetic patients at high bleeding risk: results from the XIENCE Short DAPT programme.

BACKGROUND

In patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) remains uncertain.

AIMS

We sought to compare early DAPT discontinuation in DM and non-DM patients enrolled in the prospective XIENCE Short DAPT programme.

METHODS

The effects of 1- versus 3-month DAPT on ischaemic and bleeding outcomes were compared using propensity score stratification. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year. The incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Type 2 to 5 bleeding was the key secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

Out of 3,352 included patients, 1,299 (38.8%) had DM; diabetic patients had a higher 1-year incidence of death or MI (DM vs non-DM: 10.1% vs 6.6%) and similar BARC 2-5 bleeding (DM vs non-DM: 9.5% vs 9.2%). With 1- versus 3-month DAPT, the incidence of death or MI did not statistically differ in DM patients (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-1.05) and non-DM patients (adjHR 1.26, 95% CI: 0.87-1.81), although heterogeneity by DM status was evident (p for interaction=0.015). BARC 2-5 bleeding was numerically lower with 1-month DAPT in both groups (DM: adjHR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.45-1.01; non-DM: adjHR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.56-1.07; p for interaction=0.973).

CONCLUSIONS

Among HBR patients with DM undergoing PCI, 1-month DAPT, as compared to 3-month DAPT, was not associated with an excess of fatal or non-fatal MI and even reduced the occurrence of bleeding. These findings should be interpreted in the context of a predominantly stable patient population with low procedural complexity and may not be generalisable to higher-risk cases.