• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用统计和机器学习模型对分心驾驶事故的伤害严重程度进行建模。

Modeling of injury severity of distracted driving accident using statistical and machine learning models.

作者信息

Sorum Neero Gumsar, Sorum Martina Gumsar

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, North Eastern Regional Institute of Science & Technology, Nirjuli, Arunachal Pradesh, India.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 16;20(6):e0326113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326113. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0326113
PMID:40522939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12169579/
Abstract

Distracted Driving (DD) is one of the global causes of high mortality and fatality in road traffic accidents. The increase in the number of distracted driving accidents (DDAs) is one of the concerns among transportation communities. The present study aimed to examine the individual and interacted effects of the influential factors on the injury severity of the DDAs using the Binary Logistic Regression (BLR) method, and at the same, to select the best machine learning (ML) model in predicting the injury severity of the DDA. The selection of the best ML model was based on the optimum combination of accuracy, F1 score, and area under curve metrics. Ten years of DDA data (2011-2020) provided by the police department of Imphal, India, was used in the present study. The BLR model-without-interaction results revealed that out of twenty categorical variables, nine categorical variables (below 18, 18-24, 25-40, above 40 years age group, two-wheeler, heavy motor vehicle, 12AM-6AM, 6PM-12AM, and hit-object collision) were statistically significant to the injury severity of the DDAs. In interaction model results, there were 11, 1, and 1 significant combinations among categorical variables in two-way, three-way, and four-way interaction models, respectively. The ML model results showed that overall, the XGBoost model was reported as the best-performing model in the first hyperparameter set, and the Single Layer Perceptron model in the second set. These results may be useful for transportation policymakers while implementing any countermeasures to improve road safety in hilly areas.

摘要

分心驾驶(DD)是导致道路交通事故高死亡率和高致死率的全球性原因之一。分心驾驶事故(DDA)数量的增加是交通领域关注的问题之一。本研究旨在使用二元逻辑回归(BLR)方法检验影响因素对DDA伤害严重程度的个体和交互作用,并同时选择预测DDA伤害严重程度的最佳机器学习(ML)模型。最佳ML模型的选择基于准确率、F1分数和曲线下面积指标的最佳组合。本研究使用了印度英帕尔警察局提供的十年DDA数据(2011 - 2020年)。无交互作用的BLR模型结果显示,在二十个分类变量中,九个分类变量(18岁以下、18 - 24岁、25 - 40岁、40岁以上年龄组、两轮车、重型机动车、午夜12点至凌晨6点、下午6点至午夜12点以及碰撞物体)对DDA的伤害严重程度具有统计学意义。在交互作用模型结果中,双向、三向和四向交互作用模型的分类变量之间分别有11个、1个和1个显著组合。ML模型结果表明,总体而言,在第一组超参数中,XGBoost模型被报告为表现最佳的模型,在第二组中则是单层感知器模型。这些结果可能对交通政策制定者在实施任何改善山区道路安全的对策时有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c1c/12169579/54c38f2e2e67/pone.0326113.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c1c/12169579/daba9db89283/pone.0326113.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c1c/12169579/54c38f2e2e67/pone.0326113.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c1c/12169579/daba9db89283/pone.0326113.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c1c/12169579/54c38f2e2e67/pone.0326113.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Modeling of injury severity of distracted driving accident using statistical and machine learning models.使用统计和机器学习模型对分心驾驶事故的伤害严重程度进行建模。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 16;20(6):e0326113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326113. eCollection 2025.
2
Identification of the best machine learning model for the prediction of driver injury severity.识别用于预测驾驶员伤害严重程度的最佳机器学习模型。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2024 Sep;31(3):360-375. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2024.2335478. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
3
Severity analysis of road transport accidents of hazardous materials with machine learning.基于机器学习的危险物品道路运输事故严重性分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(4):324-329. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1900569. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
4
Exploring spatial heterogeneity in factors associated with injury severity in speeding-related crashes: An integrated machine learning and spatial modeling approach.探究与超速相关事故中伤害严重程度相关因素的空间异质性:一种集成机器学习和空间建模方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Oct;206:107697. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107697. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
5
Investigating the factors behind cellphone-distracted crashes: Assessing injury severity among distracted drivers in states with and without cell phone bans.探究手机分心导致撞车事故背后的因素:评估有无手机禁令的州中分心驾驶者的受伤严重程度。
J Safety Res. 2025 Feb;92:192-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.11.004. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
6
Exploring the impacts of built environment on pedestrian injury severity involving distracted driving.探究建成环境对涉及分心驾驶的行人受伤严重程度的影响。
J Safety Res. 2022 Feb;80:97-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
7
Influence of built environment on the severity of vehicle crashes caused by distracted driving: A multi-state comparison.建筑环境对分心驾驶导致车辆碰撞严重程度的影响:多州比较。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Feb;150:105920. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105920. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
8
Distraction-related road traffic collisions.与注意力分散相关的道路交通碰撞事故。
Afr Health Sci. 2017 Jun;17(2):491-499. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v17i2.24.
9
Unraveling the differences in distracted driving injury severities in passenger car, sport utility vehicle, pickup truck, and minivan crashes.剖析乘用车、运动型多用途汽车、皮卡和小型货车碰撞事故中分心驾驶导致的伤害严重程度差异。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Mar;196:107444. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107444. Epub 2024 Jan 1.
10
Injury prevention programs against distracted driving: Are they effective?预防分心驾驶的伤害预防计划:它们有效吗?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Jul 3;17(5):460-4. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1116042. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing Cognitive Load Detection in Simulated Driving Scenarios Through Deep Learning and fNIRS Data.通过深度学习和功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)数据推进模拟驾驶场景中的认知负荷检测
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 9;25(16):4921. doi: 10.3390/s25164921.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of the best machine learning model for the prediction of driver injury severity.识别用于预测驾驶员伤害严重程度的最佳机器学习模型。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2024 Sep;31(3):360-375. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2024.2335478. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
E2DR: A Deep Learning Ensemble-Based Driver Distraction Detection with Recommendations Model.E2DR:一种基于深度学习的驾驶员分神检测与推荐模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 26;22(5):1858. doi: 10.3390/s22051858.
3
Assessment of the Influence of Technology-Based Distracted Driving on Drivers' Infractions and Their Subsequent Impact on Traffic Accidents Severity.
评估基于技术的驾驶分神对驾驶员违规行为的影响及其对交通事故严重程度的后续影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 4;18(13):7155. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137155.
4
A performance analysis of prediction techniques for impacting vehicles in hit-and-run road accidents.撞击车辆在肇事逃逸道路事故中的预测技术的性能分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jul;157:106164. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106164. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
Research on a Cognitive Distraction Recognition Model for Intelligent Driving Systems Based on Real Vehicle Experiments.基于实车实验的智能驾驶系统认知分心识别模型研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 7;20(16):4426. doi: 10.3390/s20164426.
6
Identifying the distracting aspects of electronic advertising billboards: A driving simulation study.识别电子广告看板的干扰因素:驾驶模拟研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;145:105710. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105710. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
7
Evaluating the causal effects of cellphone distraction on crash risk using propensity score methods.运用倾向评分方法评估手机分心对事故风险的因果效应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Aug;143:105579. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105579. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
A Machine-Learning Approach to Distinguish Passengers and Drivers Reading While Driving.一种基于机器学习的方法,用于区分驾驶时阅读的乘客和司机。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 19;19(14):3174. doi: 10.3390/s19143174.
9
Classification of Driver Distraction: A Comprehensive Analysis of Feature Generation, Machine Learning, and Input Measures.驾驶员分心的分类:特征生成、机器学习和输入测量的综合分析。
Hum Factors. 2020 Sep;62(6):1019-1035. doi: 10.1177/0018720819856454. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
10
Understanding driver distractions in fatal crashes: An exploratory empirical analysis.理解致命事故中的驾驶员分心:探索性实证分析。
J Safety Res. 2019 Jun;69:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Feb 6.