Knake Lindsey A, Kettelkamp Joshua M, Bronson Alison, Meyer Nathan, Hacker Kenneth, Blum James M
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.
Health Care Information Systems, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Aug;16(4):848-854. doi: 10.1055/a-2632-0605. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
Interruptive clinical decision support (CDS) alerts are intended to improve patient care, but can contribute to alert fatigue, diminishing their effectiveness. The alert demonstrated minimal clinical effect while contributing significantly to alert fatigue.This study aims to evaluate if transitioning a high-firing medication on hold alert from interruptive to noninterruptive would change provider practices.The alert was triggered when at least two medications were held for >48 hours. A pre-post intervention cohort study was conducted to evaluate transitioning the medication on hold alert from interruptive to noninterruptive. A comparison was made to evaluate provider practices in resuming medications during the 6 months before and after transitioning the alert. Data were extracted from the medication administration record and the institutional risk reporting system.After transitioning to a noninterruptive alert, the number of actions taken by clicking on the alert decreased from 33,632 (3.0 clicks per hospital encounter) to 305 (0.02 clicks per hospital encounter) in a 6-month period. There was no significant change in the median hold duration of medications that were on hold for greater than 48 hours (81.5 hours and 85.6 hours in the pre- and postintervention cohorts, respectively [-value = 0.22]). There was no change in the most frequent medications that were held until patient discharge, and there was no increased reporting of medication-on-hold safety events.The initial interruptive medication on hold alert was not effective and contributed to a high volume of alerts in our institution. Transitioning the medications on hold alert from an interruptive to a noninterruptive alert reduced potential alert fatigue without significantly impacting clinical outcomes. These findings highlight the need for careful evaluation of CDS alerts to balance clinical utility and provider alert burden. Alerts that do not affect the desired clinical outcome should be redesigned or retired.
中断式临床决策支持(CDS)警报旨在改善患者护理,但可能会导致警报疲劳,降低其有效性。该警报显示出最小的临床效果,同时却极大地加剧了警报疲劳。本研究旨在评估将高触发频率的用药暂停警报从中断式转变为非中断式是否会改变医护人员的行为。当至少两种药物被暂停使用超过48小时时,该警报就会触发。进行了一项干预前后队列研究,以评估将用药暂停警报从中断式转变为非中断式的效果。比较了转变警报前后6个月内医护人员恢复用药的行为。数据从用药管理记录和机构风险报告系统中提取。转变为非中断式警报后,在6个月内,通过点击警报采取的行动数量从33632次(每次医院诊疗3.0次点击)降至305次(每次医院诊疗0.02次点击)。被暂停使用超过48小时的药物的中位暂停时长没有显著变化(干预前和干预后队列中分别为81.5小时和85.6小时[P值 = 0.22])。直到患者出院仍被暂停使用的最常见药物没有变化,并且用药暂停安全事件的报告也没有增加。最初的中断式用药暂停警报无效,且在我们机构中导致了大量警报。将用药暂停警报从中断式转变为非中断式警报减少了潜在的警报疲劳,同时没有显著影响临床结果。这些发现凸显了仔细评估CDS警报以平衡临床效用和医护人员警报负担的必要性。不影响期望临床结果的警报应重新设计或停用。